Trapped between accountability and professional learning? School leaders and teacher evaluation

References

• Ahn, J., Dik, B.J., and Hornback, R., 2017. The experience of career change driven by a sense of calling: an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach. Journal of vocational behavior, 102, 48–62. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos-Bevan, B., 2018. Teacher evaluation in Chile: highlights and complexities in 13 years of experience. Teachers and teaching, 24 (3), 297–311. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1388228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, G., 2003. Att förstå skolan. En teori om skolan som institution och skolor som organisationer [How to understand schools. A theory about the school as an institution and schools as organisations]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bolam, R., et al., 2005. Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. London: Department of Education and Skills. (DFES) Research Report RR 637.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, T., 2013. The professional landscape: the historical development of professions in Sweden. Professions and professionalism, 3 (2). doi:10.7577/pp.558
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. and Cowie, B., 2016. Chinese preservice teachers’ beliefs about assessment. Educational practice and theory, 38 (2), 77–93. doi:10.7459/ept/38.2.05
   Google Scholar
• Cherrington, S. and Thornton, K., 2015. The nature of professional learning communities in New Zealand early childhood education: an exploratory study. Professional development in education, 41 (2), 310–328. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.986817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., 2011 «Staffing to the test»: are today’s school personnel practices evidence based? Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 33 (4), 483–505. doi:10.3102/0162373711419845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins, J.B. and Earl, L.M., 1992. The case for participatory evaluation. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 14 (4), 397–418. doi:10.3102/01623737014004397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins, J.B., Whitmore, E., and Shulha, L., 2013. Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American journal of evaluation, 34 (1), 7–22. doi:10.1177/1098214012464037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., 1990. Reforming again, again, and again. Educational researcher, 19 (1), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X019001003
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., 2013. Getting teacher evaluation right: what really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., 2014. One piece of the whole: teacher evaluation as part of a comprehensive system for teaching and learning. American educator, 38 (1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, E., et al., 2015. Fifty ways to leave a child behind: idiosyncrasies and discrepancies in states’ implementation of NCLB. Educational researcher, 44 (6), 347–358. doi:10.3102/0013189X15601426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Delvaux, E., et al., 2013. How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and teacher education, 36, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M.L. and Papay, J.P., 2015. Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In: H.F. Ladd and M.E. Goertz, eds. Handbook of research in education finance and policy. New York: Routledge.174–193
   Google Scholar
• Drebeen, R., 2005. Teaching and the competence of occupations. In: L.V. Hedges and B. Schnaider, eds. The social organization of schooling. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 51–90.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., 2004 May. What is a “professional learning community”? Educational leadership,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., 2007. Professional learning communities: a bandwagon, an idea worth considering, or our best hope for high levels of learning? Middle school journal, 39 (1), 408 doi:10.1080/00940771.2007.11461607
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R. and DuFour, R., 2013. Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work TM. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R. and Eaker, R., 1998. Professional learning communities at work: best practices for enhancing students achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R.F., 1987. Reform and the culture of authority in schools. Educational administration quarterly, 23 (4), 60–78. doi:10.1177/0013161X87023004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R.F., 2000. Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert Shanker Institute. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.7688&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R.F., 2002. Bridging the gap between standards and achievement. Albert Shanker Institute. Available from: http://www.shankerinstitute.org/resource/bridging-gap-between-standards-and-achievement doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)
   Google Scholar
• Elstad, E., et al., 2014. Rapport til drøfting i GNIST-partnerskapet. (Report to the GNIST partnership) GNIST. Oslo. ISBN 978-82-999655-0-7. http://udirbeta.udir.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/rapport-fra-arbeidsgruppa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A., 1969. The semi-professions and their organization: teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012. Supporting the teaching professions for better learning outcomes. Strasbourg: SWD,, 20. 11.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2013. Supporting teacher educators for better learning outcome. Brussels, Belgium: ©European Commission 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M.A., 2012. The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: how do teachers experience it at school? Educational assessment evaluation and accountability, 24:351–368. doi:10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Flores, M.A., 2018. Teacher evaluation in Portugal: persisting challenges and perceived effects. Teachers and teaching, 24 (3), 223–245. doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1425677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Flores, M.A. and Derrington, M.L., 2017. School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: lessons learned from two empirical studies. International journal of leadership in education, 20 (4), 416–431. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatter, R., 2012. Persistent preoccupations: the rise and rise of school autonomy and accountability in England. Educational management administration & leadership, 40 (5). 559–575. doi:10.1177/1741143212451171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., and Thomas, J., eds., 2017. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M., 2010. Speech to the National College Annual Conference. Birmingham. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-to-the-national-college-annual-conference-birmingham
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J.A., Loeb, S., and Master, B., 2013. Effective instructional time use for school leaders: longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational researcher, 42 (8), 433. doi:10.3102/0013189X13510020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R., 2000. Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, M. and Chapman, C., 2009. Leading school-based networks. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A. and Rivkin, S.G., 2012. The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual review of economics, 4 (1), 131–157. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-111001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., Halász, G., and Pont, B., 2007. School leadership for systemic improvement in Finland. Paris: OECD, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. and Jones, M., 2010. Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving schools, 13 (2), 172–181. doi:10.1177/1365480210376487
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. and Jones, M.S., 2017. Professional learning communities: A strategy for school and system improvement? Cylchgrawn addysg cymru/wales journal of education, 19 (1), 16–38. doi:10.16922/wje.19.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. and Yates, G.C., 2013. Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heitink, M.C., et al., 2016. A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational research review, 17, 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I. and Homme, A., 2007. Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study of teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European educational research journal, 6 (3), 232–249. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.232
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., and Stigler, J.W., 2002. A knowledge base for the teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we get one? Educational researcher, 31 (5), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X031005003
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, K.K. and Huffman, J.B., eds., 2010. Demystifying professional learning communities: school leadership at its best. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, K.K., et al., 2008. Sustaining professional learning communities: case studies. Journal of educational change, 9 (2), 173–195. doi:10.1007/s10833-007-9060-8
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland, I., et al., 2016. Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 377–386. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, E.L., Klasik, D., and Loeb, S., 2010. Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American journal of education, 116 (4), 491–523. doi:10.1086/653625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R.M., 2003. Who controls teacher’s work? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiayi, W. and Ling, C., 2012. Reviewing teacher evaluation of rewards and punishments: the overview of Chinese teacher evaluation research. Education research international.
   Google Scholar
• Kaser, L. and Halbert, J., 2006. An approach to school-wide action research: sustaining inquiries in networked learning communities. BC educational leadership research, 6, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., and Turunen, T., 2016. Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education, 55, 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.A. and Gilmour, A.F., 2016. Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals’ views and experiences. Educational administration quarterly, 52 (5), 711–753. doi:10.1177/0013161X16653445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krokfors, L., et al., 2011. Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research‐based teacher education. Teaching education, 22 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/10476210.2010.542559
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., and Charalambous, C.Y., 2013. What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 36, 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A.L., 2014. Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers college record, 116 (1), 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillejord, S., et al., 2014. Former for lærervurdering som kan ha positiv innvirkning på skolens kvalitet: en systematisk kunnskapsoversikt [Teacher evaluation with positive impact on quality in school. A systematic review] Oslo: Kunnskapssenter for utdanning. www.kunnskapssenter.no
   Google Scholar
• Lillejord, S., Elstad, E., and Kavli, H., 2018. Teacher evaluation as a wicked policy problem. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 25 (3),291–309, doi:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1429388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Xu, X., and Stronge, J.H., 2016. Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 28 (2), 161–177. doi:10.1007/s11092-016-9237-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu., S. and Zhao, D., 2013. Teacher evaluation in China: latest trends and future directions, Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability 25, 231–250. doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9168-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D.C., 1969. The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In: Etzioni, eds. The semi-professions and their organization – teachers, nurses, social workers. New.York: The Free Press.1-53
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D.C., 1975. School teacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Lovdata, 2016. Forskrift om rammeplan for grunnskolelærerutdanning 1-7 Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2016-06-07-860
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U.P., 2011. PISA as a political instrument. In: M.A. Pereyra, H.G. Kotthoff, and R. Cowen, eds. Pisa under examination. Dorderecht: Sense Publisher, 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, F., Taut, S., and Schaaf, K., 2016. Classroom observation for evaluating and improving teaching: an international perspective. Studies in educational evaluation, 49, 15–29. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Maslow, V.J. and Kelley, C.J., 2012. Does evaluation advance teaching practice? the effects of performance evaluation on teaching quality and system change in large diverse high schools, Journal of school leadership 22 (3),600–632. doi:10.1177/105268461202200307
   Google Scholar
• *Master, B., 2013. Staffing for success: linking teacher evaluation and school personnel management in practice Educational evaluation and policy analysis. Published online before print October 4. doi:10.3102/0162373713506552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson, M., Eilertsen, T.V., and Rorrison, D., 2011. A practicum turn in teacher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher, p. 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J., 2013. From bureaucracy to profession: remaking the educational sector for the twenty-first century. Harvard educational review, 83 (3), 463–488. doi:10.17763/haer.83.3.kr08797621362v05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83 (2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B., 1983. The structure of educational organizations. In: J.W. Meyer and W.R. Scott, eds.. Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 71–97.
   Google Scholar
• Mizala, A. and Schneider, B.R., 2014. Negotiating education reform: teacher evaluations and incentives in Chile (1990–2010). Governance, 27 (1), 87–109. doi:10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander, A. and Terum, L.I., ed., 2008. Profesjonsstudier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, J., 2009. Investigating secondary school leaders’ perceptions of performance management, Educational management administration & leadership 37 (6),735–765. doi:10.1177/1741143209345569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morgado, J.C. and Sousa, F., 2010. Teacher evaluation, curricular autonomy and professional development: trends and tensions in the Portuguese educational policy. Journal of education policy, 25 (3), 369–384 doi:10.1080/02680931003624524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P.W., et al., 2006. Exploring the role of formal bodies of knowledge in defining a profession–the case of project management. International journal of project management, 24 (8), 710–721. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Nehring, J.H. and O’Brien, E.J., 2012. Strong agents and weak systems: university support for school level improvement, Journal of educational change, 13 (4), 449–485. doi:10.1007/s10833-012-9187-0
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O., 2013. Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford review of education, 39 (1), 4–16. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, 2009. Teacher evaluation: a conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD [The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development], 2005. Teachers matter: attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. OECD. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, S., 2014. Teacher professional learning communities: going beyond contrived collegiality toward challenging debate and collegial learning and professional growth, Australian journal of adult learning, 54 (2), 54–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J.T. and Lawn, M.A., 2017. Teachers, professionalism and class: A study of organized teachers (Vol. 42). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J., 2012. Refocusing the debate: assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard educational review, 82 (1), 123–141. doi:10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott, C. and Oates, C., 2017. Professional learning communities as drivers of educational change: the case of learning rounds. Journal of educational change, 18 (2), 209–234. doi:10.1007/s10833-016-9278-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W.J., 1988. The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 1 (3), 269–273. doi:10.1007/BF00123822
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G., 1945. Knowing how and knowing that: the presidential address. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian society. Wiley: Aristotelian Society, Vol. 46, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R., 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18, 145–165. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P., 2011. The professional educator: lessons from finland. American educator, 35 (2), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Santelices, M.V. and Taut, S., 2011. Convergent validity evidence regarding the validity of the Chiliean standards-based teacher evaluation system: Assessment in education: principles, policy and practice, 18 (1), 73–93. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.534948
   Google Scholar
• Santelices, M.V., et al., 2017. Two teacher quality measures and the role of context: evidence from Chile. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 29 (2), 111–146. doi:10.1007/s11092-016-9247-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, P., et al., 2013. Teacher evaluation in Chile. Main conclusions. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S.B., 1990. The predictable failure of educational reform: can we change course before it’s too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S.R., and Brown, E.R., 2011. Rethinking Teacher Evaluation in Chicago: Lessons Learned from Classroom Observations, Principal-Teacher Conferences, and District Implementation. Research Report. Consortium on Chicago School Research. 1313 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In: R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagné, and M. Scriven, eds. Perspectives on curriculum evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 39–83
   Google Scholar
• Shirrell, M., Hopkins, M., and Spillane, J.P., 2018. Educational infrastructure, professional learning, and changes in teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs. Professional Development in Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1452784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, P.R.J. and Ruijters, M.C., 2014. The real professional is a learning professional. In: International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Dordrecht: Springer, 955–985.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P., 2014. Authentic teacher evaluation: a two-tiered proposal for formative and summative assessment. English education, 46 (2), 165–185.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W.C., 2014. The global transformation toward testing for accountability. Education policy analysis archives/archivos analíticos de políticas educativas, 22, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Spooren, P. and Christiaens, W., 2017. I liked your course because I believe in (the power of) student evaluations of teaching (SET). Students’ perceptions of a teaching evaluation process and their relationships with SET scores. Studies in educational evaluation, 54, 43–49. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., et al., 2006. Professional learning communities: a review of the literature. Journal of educational change, 7 (4), 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., 2009. Can high stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform. Journal of educational change, 10 (2–3), 211–227. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9105-2
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M., 2005. Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British journal of educational studies, 53 (4), 466–478. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Taut, S., et al., 2011. Perceived effects and uses of the national teacher evaluation system in Chilean elementary schools, Studies in educational evaluation, 37, 218–229. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Taut, S., et al., 2010. Theory underlying a national teacher evaluation program. Evaluation and program planning, 33 (4), 477–486. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taut, S. and Sun, Y., 2014. *The development and implementation of a national, standards-based, multi-method teacher performance assessment system in Chile. Education policy analysis archives, 22 (58) http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/
   Google Scholar
• Taut, S., et al., 2016. Teacher performance and student learning: linking evidence from two national assessment programmes. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 23 (1), 53–74. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.961406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornero, B. and Taut, S., 2010. A mandatory, high-stakes national teacher evaluation system: perceptions and attributions of teachers who actively refuse to participate, Studies in educational evaluation, 36, 132–142. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• *Tuytens, M. and Devos, G., 2011. Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: an impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and teacher education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27 (5), 891–899. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tuytens, M. and Devos, G., 2014a. The problematic implementation of teacher evaluation policy: school failure or governmental pitfall? Educational management administration & leadership, 42 (4_suppl), 155–174. doi:10.1177/1741143213502188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tuytens, M. and Devos, G., 2014b. How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation? School effectiveness and school improvement, 25 (4), 509–530. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.842601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tuytens, M. and Devos, G., 2017. The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching, 23 (1), 6–24. (online 2016) doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tuytens, M. and Devos, G., 2018. Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by school principals: the case of Flanders (Belgium). Teachers and teaching, 24 (3), 209–222. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1397508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyack, D.B. and Cuban, L., 1995. Tinkering toward utopia. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., et al., 2013. The professionalisation of Nordic school leadership. In: L. Moos, eds. Transnational influences on values and practices in nordic educational leadership Netherlands: Springer, 133–157
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D. and Gonzalez-Vaillant, G., 2017. Within the teacher evaluation policies black box: two case studies. Teacher development, 21 (3), 404–421. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1259649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geel, M., et al., 2017. Changes in educators’ data literacy during a data-based decision-making intervention. Teaching and teacher education, 64, 187–198. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vekeman, E., Devos, G., and Tuytens, M., 2015. The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 27 (2), 129–151. doi:10.1007/s11092-014-9203-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., and Adams, A., 2008. A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24 (1), 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C., 2014. Effective professional learning communities? The possibilities for teachers as agents of change in schools, British educational research journal, 40 (1), 18–29 doi:10.1002/berj.3025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E., 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative science quarterly, 1–19. doi:10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C.H., 1972. Evaluation research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. and Bier, M., 2015. Opportunities and pitfalls in the turn toward clinical experience in US teacher education. Rethinking clinical experiences in preservice teacher education, 20–46.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.F. and Ng, H.M., 2011. A case study of teacher appraisal in shanghai, China: in relation to teacher professional development, Asia pacific education review, 12, 569–580. doi:10.1007/s12564-011-9159-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, X.F. and Ng, H.M., 2017. An effective model of teacher appraisal: evidence from secondary schools in Shanghai, China. Educational management administration & leadership, 45,(2), 196–218. doi:10.1177/1741143215597234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar