Valuing technology-enhanced academic conferences for continuing professional development. A systematic literature review

References

• Altmann, T., 2014. Potential of Twitter archives. Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. and Anderson, T., 2010. Online conferences: professional development for a networked era. Charlotte, NC, USA: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., and Christiansen, J.-A. (2004). Online conferences for professional development. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (Eds.), Online Professional Development for Teachers, 13–29. Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. and Mason, R., 1993. The Bangkok Project: new tool for professional development. American journal of distance education, 7 (2), 5–18. doi:10.1080/08923649309526819
   Google Scholar
• Aramo-Immonen, H., et al., 2016. Visualizing informal learning behavior from conference participants’ Twitter data with the Ostinato Model. Computers in human behavior, 55, 584–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aramo-Immonen, H., Jussila, J., and Huhtamäki, J., 2015. Exploring co-learning behavior of conference participants with visual network analysis of Twitter data. Computers in human behavior, 51, 1154–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzmueller, M., et al., 2010. Enhancing social interactions at conferences. it + ti - informationstechnik and technische informatik, 53 (3), 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Atzmueller, M., and Lemmerich, F. 2018. Homophily at Academic Conferences. In Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 109–110. Lyon, France.https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186953
   Google Scholar
• Bert, F., Paget, D.Z., and Scaioli, G., 2016. A social way to experience a scientific event: twitter use at the 7th European Public Health Conference. Scandinavian journal of public health, 44 (2), 130–133. doi:10.1177/1403494815612932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombaci, S.P., et al., 2016. Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference. Conservation biology, 30 (1), 216–225. doi:10.1111/cobi.12570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan, G., 2010.Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter, 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI, 2010, 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
   Google Scholar
• Brusilovsky, P., et al., 2016. Linking information and people in a social system for academic conferences. New review of hypermedia and multimedia, 4568 (July), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R.S. and Zinn, L.F., 1999. Professional development for faculty: a conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative higher education, 23 (4), 241–254. doi:10.1023/A:1022978806131
   Google Scholar
• Carr, T., 2016. Designing online conferences to promote professional development in Africa. International journal of education and development using information and communication technology, 12 (2), 80–104.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., 1995. Technological or media determinism [online]. Available from: http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/tecdet/ [Accessed 22 September 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., 2011. Is the backchannel enabled? Using twitter at academic conferences. In: 2011 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). New Orleans, Louisiana, 1–13. New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Chen, X., and Xing, W., 2015. “Twitter Archeology” of learning analytics and knowledge conferences. In: Proceedings of the 5th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK15). 340–349.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S., 2012. What are universities for?. Penguin UK. London, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, B. and Pieters, J., 2007. Knowledge sharing at conferences. Educational research and evaluation, 13 (3), 237–247. doi:10.1080/13803610701626168
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, M.D., 2015. Reconsidering the scholarly conference for the contemporary academic. PS, 48 (2), 315–318.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, M., et al., 2010. Getting granular on Twitter: tweets from a conference and their limited usefulness for non-participants. In: N. Reynolds and M. Turcsányi-Szabó, eds. Key competencies in the knowledge society. Berlin: Springer, 102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, M. 2013. The Influence of Twitter on the Academic Environment. In B. Pătru, M. Pătruţ, & C. Cmeciu (Eds.), Social Media and the New Academic Environment. 293–307. IGI Global. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2851-9.ch015
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, M. and Altmann, T., 2014. What are we tweeting about? Providing context for Twitter analysis. International journal of computer and informationtechnology, 03 (06), 1390–1397.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, M. and Reinhardt, W., 2009. Social networking in scientific conferences–twitter as tool for strengthen a scientific community. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science. 1–8. Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, D., 2016. Women’s participation in academic conferences in Israel. Journal of higher education policy and management, 38 (4), 406–421. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2016.1181887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferman, T., 2002. Academic professional development practice: what lecturers find valuable. International journal for academic development, 7 (January 2014), 146–158. doi:10.1080/1360144032000071305
   Google Scholar
• Gesthuizen, R. and Rablin, A., 2014. Tweeching: learning that is personal and social. In: Australian Computers in Education Conference. 1–11. Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Grosseck, G. and Holotescu, C., 2010. Learning from the stream. An ‘M’ Case Study: M for microblogging, m(y)-conference/m(y)-event, and micro/m(y)-learning. In: ICVL 2010, 5th International Conference on Virtual Learning. Târgu-Mureş, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, K.J., Wiessner, C.A., and Robinson, E.E., 2009. Encountering new information and perspectives: constructing knowledge in conference contexts. The journal of continuing higher education, 57 (2), 72–82. doi:10.1080/07377360902964384
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D., Smith, M.A., and Shneiderman, B., 2011. EventGraphs: charting collections of conference connections. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1–10. Kauai, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., 2010. Unique benefits of conference attendance as a method of professional development for LIS professionals. The serials librarian, 59 (3–4), 263–270. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2010.489353
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C., Kimura, B., and Boulay, R. 2011. Retrospective analysis of a virtual worldwide conference for elearning. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 5(1),107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C., Kimura, B., and Narita, S., 2006. Evolution of a virtual worldwide conference on online teaching. In: Proceedings of Distance Learning and the Internet. Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, N. and McFarlane, A., 2005. Conferences as learning communities: some early lessons in using `back-channel’ technologies at an academic conference - distributed intelligence or divided attention? JCAL, 21 (5), 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis - WebKDD/SNA-KDD ’07. 56–65. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1348549.1348556
   Google Scholar
• Jesson, J.K., Matheson, L., and Lacey, F.M., 2011. Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jussila, J., et al., 2013. Information visualization of Twitter data for co-organizing conferences. In: 17th International Academic MindTrek Conference. 139–145. Tampere, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Jussila, J., et al., 2014. Visual network analysis of Twitter Data for co-organizing conferences: case CMAD 2013. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1474–1483. Waikoloa, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., 2011. Providing an amplified event service [online]. Available from: https://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/08/22/providing-an-amplified-event-service/
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Tonkin, E., and Shabajee, P., 2005. Using networked technologies to support conferences. In: EUNIS 2005 Conference Proceedings. Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., 2005. Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of in-service education, 31 (2), 235–250. doi:10.1080/13674580500200277
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., 2014. Understanding continuing professional development: the need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional development in education, 40 (5), 688–697. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
   Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R. and Veletsianos, G., 2016. Education scholars’ evolving uses of twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform. BJET, 47 (3). 445–464.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, B., and Ho, C., 2008. Online conferences and workshops: affordable & ubiquitous learning opportunities for faculty development. In Distance Learning and the Internet, 61–65. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.
   Google Scholar
• King, H., 2004. Continuing professional development in higher education. what do academics do? 13, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kounavis, C.D., Zamani, E.D., and Giaglis, G.M., 2011. A mobile application supporting conference attendees and organizers. In: 2011 15th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics. IEEE, 333–337. Kastonia, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Letierce, J., et al., 2010a. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Web Science Conference 2010. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Letierce, J., et al., 2010b. Using Twitter during an academic conference: the # iswc2009 use-case. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 279–282. Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J. and Greenhow, C., 2015. Scholars and social media: tweeting in the conference backchannel for professional learning. Educational media international, 52 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.1005426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. and Krasny, M.E., 2019. Development of professional networks among environmental educators. Professional development in education, 00 (00), 1–17. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1562957
   Google Scholar
• Looi, C.-K., et al., 2010. Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda. British journal of educational technology, 41 (2), 154–169. doi:10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw, I. and Zuber-Skerritt, O., 2011. The learning conference: knowledge creation through participation and publication. The learning organization, 18 (4), 288–300. doi:10.1108/09696471111132504
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B., 2007. Defining and rewarding academic Citizenship: the implications for university promotions policy. Journal of higher education policy and management, 29 (3), 261–273. doi:10.1080/13600800701457863
   Google Scholar
• Mahrt, M., Weller, K., and Peters, I., 2013. Twitter in scholarly communication. In: K. Weller, et al., eds. Twitter and Society. NY, USA: Peter Lang Publishing, 399–410.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J. and Frew, E., 2016. Academic conferences: a female duo-ethnography. Current issues in tourism, 1–21. doi:10.1080/13683500.2014.932758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazarakis, A. and Peters, I., 2015. Science 2. 0 and conference tweets: what? Where? Why? When? The electronic journal of knowledge management, 13 (4), 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. F., & Boyd, danah m., 2005. Digital backchannels in shared physical spaces. In CHI ’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 1641–1644. Portland, OR, USA: ACM Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056986
   Google Scholar
• McKendrick, D.R.A., Cumming, G.P., and Lee, A.J., 2012. Increased use of Twitter at a medical conference: a report and a review of the educational opportunities. Journal of medical internet research, 14 (6), 197–206. doi:10.2196/jmir.2144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J.M., 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27 (1), 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijs, C., Prinsen, F.R., and de Laat, M.F., 2016. Social learning as approach for teacher professional development how well does it suit them?. Educational media international, 53, 2. doi:10.1080/09523987.2016.1211333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 62 (10), 1006–1012. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, J., Lavis, J.N., and Ranson, M.K., 2012. A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them? Health research policy and systems, 10 (1), 1. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-10-26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osborne, N., 2011. Amplification and analysis of academic events through social media: A case study of the 2009 beyond the repository fringe event. In L. A. Wankel & C. Wankel (Eds.), Higher education administration with social media. 167–190. Emerald Group Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000002012
   Google Scholar
• Parra, D., et al., 2016. Twitter in academic events: A study of temporal usage, communication, sentimental and topical patterns in 16 Computer Science conferences. Computer communications, 73, 301–314. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, K. and Shabajee, P., 2012. Best practices for event amplification: a greening events II report. University of Bath, Bath, UK..
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, A., 2014. Consideration of multicultural learning in conference content and program design: a pilot study. Journal of convention & event tourism, 15 (1), 25–56. doi:10.1080/15470148.2013.871211
   Google Scholar
• Ravn, I. and Elsborg, S., 2011. Facilitating learning at conferences. International journal of learning and change, 5 (1), 1–15. doi:10.1504/IJLC.2011.041873
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, W., et al., 2009. How people are using Twitter during conferences. In: V. Hornung-Prahauser and M. Luckmann, eds. Creativity and Innovation Competencies on the Web, Proceeding of 5th EduMedia conference. Salzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., et al., 2011. Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists. Journal of documentation, 67 (2), 214–237. doi:10.1108/00220411111109449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C., & Welsh, A., 2010. Pointless babble or enabled backchannel: conference use of Twitter by digital humanists. In Digital Humanities 2010. 214–217. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sangrà, A., Gonzalez-Sanmamed, M., and Guitert, M. (2013). Learning ecologies: informal professional development opportunities for teachers. In 2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM). IEEE. doi:10.1109/CICEM.2013.6820171
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, C., et al., 2014. On the predictability of talk attendance at academic conferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.0613.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., 2008. Introduction. In N. Selwyn (Ed.), Education 2.0? Designing the web for teaching and learning: a commentary by the technology enhanced learning phase of the teaching and learning research programme, 4. London, UK: TLRP.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffman, D.S., 2012. Twitter as a tool for conservation education and outreach: what scientific conferences can do to promote live-tweeting. Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 2 (3), 257–262. doi:10.1007/s13412-012-0080-1
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G., Tittenberger, P., and Anderson, T., 2008. Conference connections: rewiring the circuit. Educause review, 43 (2), 14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sopan, A., et al., 2012. Monitoring academic conferences: real-time visualization and retrospective analysis of backchannel conversations. In: 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics. Ieee, 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Su, X., et al., 2016. Can academic conferences promote research collaboration? In: Proceedings of the JCDL ’16. 231–232.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, A., 2006. Building and maintaining an online academic conference series. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 36 (12), 1081–1088. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, A., Straker, L., and Pollock, C., 2011. Establishing and maintaining an online community of academics: longitudinal evaluation of a virtual conference series. International journal of web based communities, 7 (1), 116–135. doi:10.1504/IJWBC.2011.038129
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, C. and Peters, S., 2010. Educators’ perceptions of uses, constraints, and successful practices of backchanneling. In education, 16 (1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, R. and MacDonald, K.I., 2009. Identifying subject-specific conferences as professional development opportunities for the academic librarian. The journal of academic librarianship, 35 (6), 583–590. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramontin, A. de P. A., Gasparini, I., & Pereira, R., 2018. Using social elements to recommend sessions in academic events. In Sakae Yamamoto & H. Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information in Applications and Services. 200–210. Las Vegas, NV, USA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92046-7_18
   Google Scholar
• Travers, R., et al., 2008. Increasing accessibility for community participants at academic conferences. Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2 (3), 257–264. doi:10.1353/cpr.0.0033
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udovicich, C., Barberi, A., and Perera, K., 2016. Tweeting the meeting: A comparative analysis of an Australian emergency medicine conference over four years. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock, 9 (1), 28–31. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.161655
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weller, K., Dröge, E., and Puschmann, C., 2011. Citation analysis in twitter: approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. In M. Rowe, M. Stankovic, A.-S. Dadzie, & M. Hardey (Eds.), Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2011): Big things come in small packages. 1–12. Heraklion, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, K. and Puschmann, C., 2011. Twitter for scientific communication: how can citations/references be identified and measured? In: Proceedings of the ACM WebSci’11. 1–4. Koblenz, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., Parra, D., and Trattner, C., 2014. How groups of people interact with each other on Twitter during academic conferences. In: Proceedings of the 17th Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. New York, USA: ACM Press, 253–256.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., 1998a. Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9 (5), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., 1998b. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., Trayner, B., and de Laat, M., 2011. Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S.E., et al., 2015. The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings. BJU international, 115 (5), 839–846. doi:10.1111/bju.12770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfswinkel, J., Furtmueller, E., and Wilderom, Celeste P M., 2013. Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European journal of information systems, 22(1),45–55. doi:doi.10.1057/ejis.2011.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongchokprasitti, C., Brusilovsky, P., and Para, D., 2010. Conference navigator 2.0: community-based recommendation for academic conferences. In Workshop on Social Reminder Systems (SRS ’10), 1–5. Hong Kong, China.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O., 2017. Introduction. In: O. Zuber-Skerritt, ed.. Conferences as sites of learning and development: using participatory action learning and action research approaches. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar