Classroom discourse in mathematics lessons: the effect of a hybrid practice-based professional development program

References

• Alexander, R., 2006. Towards dialogic teaching, 68 (4), 411–425. York, UK: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L. and Cohen, D.K., 1999. Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In: G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond, eds. Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L. and Forzani, F., 2009. The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. The journal of teacher education, 60 (5), 497–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, T., Jackson, D., and Harper, B., 2014. Responding to the call to prepare highly effective teacher candidates in the united states: the curriculum redesign effort in advancing teacher education. Higher education studies, 4 (2), 9–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n2p9.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., 2002. Issues and trends concerning electronic networking technologies for teacher professional development: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., et al., 2008. Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and teacher education, 24 (2), 417–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., et al., 2011. Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs. ZDM, 43 (1), 175–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0302-5.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., et al., 2014. Facilitating video-based professional development: planning and orchestrating productive discussions. In: Y. Li, E. A. Silver, & S. Li, Eds.Transforming mathematics instruction. Cham: Springer, 259–281.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., et al., 2017. The role of video-based discussion in model for preparing professional development leaders. International journal of STEM education, 4 (1), 29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0090-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., and Koellner, K., 2010. Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International encyclopedia of education, 7 (2), 548–556.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., Ed., 2004. Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10: using video in teacher education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2015. Challenges in identifying high-leverage practices. Teachers college record, 117 (7), 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J., 1982. Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of reading behavior, 14 (4), 429–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968209547468.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. 2016. Common core state standards for mathematics. Available from: http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf [Accessed 18 Dec 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, M.D., et al., 2009. Exploring discourse‐based assessment practice and its role in mathematics professional development. Professional development in education, 35 (4), 677–680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580802594175.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C., et al., 2009. A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of teacher education, 1 (60), 8–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M. and Garet, M.S., 2015. Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, society, & education, 7 (3), 252–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, I. and Campbell, T., 2008. Teacher questioning and interaction patterns. International journal of science education, 30 (14), 1891–1914. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701587028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., et al., 2013. Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of teacher education, 64 (5), 426–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113494413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzani, F.M., 2014. Understanding “Core Practices” and “Practice-Based” teacher education learning from the past. Journal of teacher education, 65 (4), 357–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudin, C. and Chaliès, S., 2015. Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational research review, 16, 41–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, L.K. and Cobb, P., 2017. Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of teacher education, 68, 411–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702579
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S.A. and Ross, P., 2016. Teachers’ professional noticing. Theory into practice, 55 (3), 180–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1173996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez Zaccarelli, F., et al., 2018. Learning from professional development: A case study of the challenges of enacting productive science discourse in the classroom. Professional development in education, 44 (5), 721–737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1423368.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., et al., 2009a. Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers college record, 111 (9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., et al., 2009b. Development of the protocol for language arts teaching observation (PLATO). In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., et al., 2013. Measure for measure: the relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American journal of education, 119 (3), 445–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/669901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Cohen, J., and Brown, 2011. Classroom practices associated with value-added measures of teacher effectiveness in english language arts. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association’s annual meeting in New Orleans. April 10, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. and Cirillo, M., Eds., 2009. Promoting purposeful discourse: teacher research in mathematics classrooms. Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, A.J., et al., 2009. Mentoring beginning teachers: what we know and what we don’t. Teaching and teacher education, 25 (1), 207–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K.C., and Sherin, M.G., 2004. Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for research in mathematics education, 35 (2), 81–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30034933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R.M. and Perda, D., 2009. The mathematics and science teacher shortage: fact and myth (CPRE Rep. No. RR-62). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., Borko, H., and Koellner, K., 2009. The power of video as a tool for professional development and research: examples from the problem-solving cycle. In: T. Janik and T. Seidel, eds. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Munster: Waxmann Publishing, 259–273.
   Google Scholar
• Karsenty, R. and Arcavi, A., 2017. Mathematics, lenses and videotapes: a framework and a language for developing reflective practices of teaching. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 20, 433–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9379-x
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E. and Franke, M.L., 2004. Teacher learning in mathematics: using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 7 (3), 203–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., Franke, M.L., and Lampert, M., 2009. Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E. and Stipek, D., 2009. Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal of education, 189 (1–2), 123–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-209.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, N.B., et al., 2010. Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning: further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of teacher education, 61, 172–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., and Findell, B., 2001. Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, G.M., 2004. Meeting the need for high quality teachers: E-learning solutions. Commissioned White Paper for the U.S. Department ofEducation Secretary’s Leadership Summit on e-Learning and the U.S. Department of Education National Technology Plan.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J., 2008. Coaching: approaches and perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., and Borko, H., 2011. Mathematics professional development: critical features for developing leadership skills and building teachers’ capacity. Mathematics teacher education and development, 13 (1), 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J., 1990. Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Coorporation.
   Google Scholar
• Liston, D., Whitcomb, J., and Borko, H., 2006. Too little or to much: teacher preparation and the first years of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 351–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106291976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., et al., 2010. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Marable, M.A. and Raimondi, S.L., 2007. Teachers’ perceptions of what was most (and least) supportive during their first year of teaching. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15 (1), 25–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601037355.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H., 1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mevarech, Z. and Kramarski, B., 2014. critical maths for innovative societies: the role of metacognitive pedagogies. OECD Publications. https://www.oecd.org/publications/critical-maths-forinnovative-societies-9789264223561-en.htm
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, 2003. No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Neubert, G.A. and McNelis, S.J., 1990. Peer response: teaching specific revision suggestions. The english journal, 79 (5), 52–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/818375.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B. and Roper, D., 2003. Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity, promises and practicalities. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute Program on Education and Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., et al., 1997. Opening dialogue: understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, J.M. and Hawe, E., 2017. Facilitating real-time observation of, and peer discussion and feedback about, practice in writing classrooms. Professional development in education, 43 (5), 709–728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1241818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poglinco, S.M. and Bach, A.J., 2004. The heart of the matter: coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85 (5), 398–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), 2010. Prepare and inspire: K–12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America’s future: executive report. Executive Office of the President, President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Available from: https://nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/2a--Prepare_and_Inspire--PCAST.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T.D., 2006. Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of science teacher education, 17 (4), 323–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, R. and Yeh, C., 2014. Learning to teach mathematics and to analyze teaching effectiveness: evidence from a video-and practice-based approach. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 17 (6), 491–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9263-2.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., and Stigler, J.W., 2007. The role of lesson analysis in preservice teacher education: an empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 10, 123–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Y., et al., 2009. Talking science. The science teacher, 76 (5), 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., et al., 2009. LUV and Observe: two projects using video to diagnoes teachers’ competence. In: T. Janik and T. Seidel, eds. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Munster: Waxmann Publishing, 243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M.G., 2007. The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In: R. Goldman, et al., eds. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 383–390.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.S. and Stein, M.K., 2011. Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P.M. and Hackling, M.W., 2016. Supporting teachers to develop substantive discourse in primary science classrooms. Australian journal of teacher education, 41 (4), 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.R., 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27 (2), 237–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R. and Aranda, G., 2015. Expert teachers’ discursive moves in science classroom interactive talk. International journal of science and mathematics education, 13 (2), 425–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9617-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E.A. and Sherin, M.G., 2010. The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 13, 155–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B.M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308–319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar