References
- Ancess, J., Barnett, E., and Allen, D., 2007. Using research to inform the practice of teachers, schools, and school reform organizations. Theory Into practice, 46 (4), 325–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593915
- Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., and Strauss, T., 2010. Leading data use in schools: organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and policy in schools, 9, 292–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731492
- Baskerville, D. and Goldblatt, H., 2009. Learning to be a critical friend: from professional indifference through challenge to unguarded conversations. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39 (2), 205–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902260
- BERA/RSA. (2014). Research and the teaching profession: building the capacity for a self-improving education system. London. Available from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/project/research-and-teacher-education
- Bernhardt, V.L., 2013. Data analysis for continuous school improvement. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Blok, H., Sleegers, P., and Karsten, S., 2008. Looking for a balance between internal and external evaluation of school quality: evaluation of the SVI model. Journal of education policy, 23 (4), 379–395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930801923773
- Bloomberg, L. and Volpe, M. (2008). Completing your qualitative dissertation: a roadmap from beginning to end. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Borko, H., 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33 (8), 3–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
- Boudett, K.P., City, E.A., and Murnane, R.J., 2005. Data wise: a step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Boylan, M., et al., 2018. Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: a conceptual analysis to inform research and practice. Professional development in education, 44 (1), 120–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1306789
- Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., and Maguire, P., 2003. Why action research? Action Research, 1 (1), 9–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002
- Bubb, S. and Earley, P., 2009. Leading staff development for school improvement. School leadership and management, 29 (1), 23–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802646370
- Caputo, A. and Rastelli, V., 2014. School improvement plans and student achievement: preliminary evidence from the quality and merit project in Italy. Improving schools, 17, 72–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213515800
- Clarke, D. and Hollingsworth, H., 2002. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and teacher education, 18, 947–967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
- Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Crotty, M., 1998. The foundations of social research. London: Sage.
- Davidsdottir, S. and Lisi, P., 2007. Effects of deliberative democracy on school self evaluation. Evaluation, 13 (3), 371–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007078628
- Day, C., 1999. Developing teachers: the challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.
- Demetriou, D. and Kyriakides, L., 2012. The impact of school self-evaluation upon student achievement: a group randomisation study. Oxford review of education, 38 (2), 149–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.666032
- Demie, F., 2003. Using value-added data for school self-evaluation: A case study of practice in inner-city schools. School Leadership & Management, 23 (4), 445–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000150971
- Department of Education and Skills, 2012a. Circular 0040/2012. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
- Department of Education and Skills, 2012b. School self-evaluation guidelines for post-primary schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
- Desimone, L.M., et al., 2002. Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 24 (2), 81–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
- Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38 (3), 181–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
- DuFour, R., Eaker, R., and DuFour, R., 2005. On common ground: the power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
- Ebbeler, J., et al., 2016. Effects of a data use intervention on educators’ use of knowledge and skills. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 19–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.11.002
- Elliott, J., 1991. Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
- European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. 2015. Assuring quality in education: policies and approaches to school evaluation in Europe. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Evans, L., 2014. Leadership for professional development and learning: enhancing our understanding of how teachers develop. Cambridge journal of education, 44 (2), 179–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.860083
- Farley-Ripple, E.N. and Buttram, J.L., 2014. Developing collaborative data use through professional learning communities: early lessons from Delaware. Studies in educational evaluation, 42, 41–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006
- Finn, C., 2012. Understanding PISA and what it tells us about educational standards in Ireland. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.
- Garet, M.S., et al. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38 (4), 915–945. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
- Guskey, T.R., 2000. Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin press.
- Hall, C. and Noyes, A. 2007. The impact of school self-evaluation processes on British teachers’ views of their work and professionalism. Paper BERA, London http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/167834.doc.
- Hall, C. and Noyes, A., 2009. New regimes of truth: the impact of performative school self evaluation systems on teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and teacher education, 25 (6), 850–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.008
- Hawley, W. and Valli, L., 1999. The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In: G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond, eds. Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice. New York: Teachers College Press, 127–150.
- Hofman, R.H., Dijkstra, N.J., and Hofman, W.H.A., 2009. School self-evaluation and student achievement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 20 (1), 47–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802664115
- Ikemoto, G.S. and Marsh, J.A., 2007. Cutting through the “data-driven” mantra: different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In: P.A. Moss, ed. Evidence and decision making. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 74–104.
- Janssens, F.J. and Van Amelsvoort, G.H., 2008. School self-evaluations and school inspections in Europe: an exploratory study. Studies in educational evaluation, 34 (1), 15–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.01.002
- Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., and Freeman, C., 2005. Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teacher’s classroom practices. Journal of research in science teaching, 42 (6), 668–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
- Johansson, A. and Lindhult, E., 2008. Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action research, 6 (1), 95–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307083713
- Johnson, C., Kahle, J., and Fargo, J., 2007. A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of research in science teaching, 44 (6), 775–786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
- Katz, S., Sutherland, S., and Earl, L., 2002. Developing an evaluation habit of mind. Canadian journal of program evaluation, 17 (2), 103–119.
- Kennedy, M.M., 1998. Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- Kirwan, L., 2015. Mathematics curriculum in Ireland: the influence of PISA on the development of project maths. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8 (2), 317–332.
- Lai, M.K. and Schildkamp, K., 2013. Data-based decision making: an overview. In: K. Schildkamp and M.K. Lai, eds. Data-driven decision making in education: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 9–12.
- Lai, M.K. and McNaughton, S., 2016. The impact of data use professional development on student achievement. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 434–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.005
- MacBeath, J., 1998. ‘I didn’t know he was ill’: the role and value of the critical friend. In: L. Stoll and K. Myers, eds. No quick fixes: perspectives on schools in difficulty. London: Falmer, 118–132.
- MacBeath, J., 1999. Schools must speak for themselves: the case for school self-evaluation. New York, NY: Routledge.
- MacBeath, J., 2006. School inspection and self-evaluation: working with the new relationship. London and New York: Routledge.
- Mandinach, E.B. and Gummer, E.S., 2013. Defining data literacy: A report on a convening of experts. Journal of educational research and policy studies, 13 (2), 6–28.
- Mandinach, E.B. and Gummer, E.S., 2016. What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 366–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
- Mandinach, E.B. and Jimerson, J.B., 2016. Teachers learning how to use data: A synthesis of the issues and what is known. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 452–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.009
- Marsh, J.A., 2012. Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114 (11), 1–48.
- McNamara, G., and O’Hara, J. 2008. Trusting schools and teachers: developing educational professionalism through self-evaluation. New York: Peter Lang.
- Merchie, E., et al., 2018. Evaluating teachers’ professional development initiatives: towards an extended evaluative framework. Research papers in education, 33 (2), 143–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1271003
- Merriam, S. and Tisdell, E., 2015. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Meuret, D. and Morlaix, S., 2003. Conditions of success of a school’s self-evaluation: some lessons of a European experience. School effectiveness and school improvement, 14 (1), 53–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.14.1.53.13867
- Nelson, R., Ehren, M., and Godfrey, D., 2015. Literature review on internal evaluation.institute of education. UK. http://schoolinspections.eu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2015/09/Literature-review-internal-evaluation.pdf
- O’Brien, S., McNamara, G., and O’Hara, J., 2014. Critical facilitators: external supports for self-evaluation and improvement in schools. Studies in educational evaluation, 43, 169–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.08.002
- O’Brien, S., McNamara, G., and O’Hara, J., 2015. Supporting the consistent implementation of self-evaluation in Irish post-primary schools. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 27 (3), 377–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9218-5
- O’Hara, J., et al. 2016. Notes on a small island: national survey results of principals attitudes towards school self-evaluation (2014–2015). Dublin: (EQI) Centre for Evaluation, Quality and Inspection.
- OECD, 2013. Synergies for better learning: an international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD.
- Opfer, V.D. and Pedder, D., 2011. The lost promise of teacher professional development in England. European journal of teacher education, 34 (1), 3–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.534131
- Patton, M.Q., 2008. Utilization-focused evaluation. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Poortman, C.L. and Schildkamp, K., 2016. Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 425–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010
- Reason, P. and Bradbury, H., 2008. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. 2nd. London: Sage.
- Reeves, T.D. and Honig, S.L., 2015. A classroom data literacy intervention for preservice teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 50, 90–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.007
- Ryan, K.E., Chandler, M., and Samuels, M., 2007. What should school based evaluation look like? Studies in educational evaluation, 33, 197–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.001
- Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., and Vanhoof, J., 2014. Exploring data-use practices around Europe: identifying enablers and barriers. Studies in educational evaluation, 42, 15–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.007
- Schildkamp, K., Lai, M.K., and Earl, L., Eds., 2013. Data-based decision making in education: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Schildkamp, K. and Poortman, C.L., 2015. Factors influencing the functioning of data teams. Teachers college record, 117 (4), [040310].
- Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C.L., and Handelzalts, A., 2016. Data teams for school improvement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 27 (2), 228–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192
- Schildkamp, K. and Visscher, A., 2009. Factors influencing the utilisation of a school self evaluation instrument. Studies in educational evaluation, 35, 150–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.12.001
- Sjobakken, O.J. and Dobson, S., 2013. School self-evaluation in the longer time scale. Experiences from a small Scandinavian state. In: M. Lai and S. Kushner, eds. A developmental and negotiated approach to school self-evaluation. Advances in program evaluation. Vol. 14. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
- Stake, R.E., 1967. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers college record, 68 (7), 523–540.
- Steele, J.L. and Boudett, K.P., 2008a. Leadership lessons from schools becoming “data wise.”. Harvard education letter, 24 (1), 1–2.
- Steele, J.L. and Boudett, K.P., 2008b. The collaborative advantage. Educational Leadership, 66 (4), 54–59.
- Stenhouse, L., 1984. Artistry and teaching: the teacher as focus of research and development. In: D. Hopkins and M. Wideen, eds. Alternative perspectives on school improvement. London: Lewes Falmer Press.
- Swaffield, S., 2003. Self evaluation and the role of a critical friend. Managing schools today, 12 (5), 28–30.
- Swaffield, S., 2004. Critical friends: supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving schools, 7 (3), 267–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480204049340
- Swaffield, S., 2005. No sleeping partners: relationships between head teachers and critical friends. School leadership and management, 25 (1), 43–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243052000317082
- Swaffield, S., 2007. Light touch critical friendship. Improving schools, 10 (3), 205–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207077845
- Swaffield, S (2013) Support and challenge for school leaders: headteachers’ perceptions of school improvement partners. Educational management administration and leadership 43(1): 61–76.
- Swaffield, S., 2015. Support and challenge for school leaders: headteachers’ perceptions of school improvement partners. Educational management administration & leadership, 43 (1), 61–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494884
- Swaffield, S. and MacBeath, J., 2005. School self-evaluation and the role of a critical friend. Cambridge journal of education, 35 (2), 239–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500147037
- The Teaching Council, 2011. Policy on the continuum of teacher education. Kildare: The Teaching Council.
- Timperley, H. et al. (2007), “Teacher professional development: best evidence synthesis iteration”, Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand, http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/goto/BES
- Van den Hurk, H.T.G., Houtveen, A.A.M., and Van de Grift, W.J.C.M., 2016. Fostering effective teaching behaviour through the use of data-feedback. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 444–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.003
- Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P., and De Maeyer, S., 2009. Attitudes towards school self evaluation. Studies in educational evaluation, 35, 21–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.01.004
- Wayman, J. and Jimerson, J., 2014. Teacher needs for data-related professional learning. Studies in educational evaluation, 42, 25–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.001
- Wayman, J.C., Jimerson, J.B., and Cho, V., 2012. Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. School effectiveness and school improvement, 32 (2), 159–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.652124
- Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of Practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wilson, S.M. and Berne, J., 1999. Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: an examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of research in education, 24, 173–209.
- Yoon, K.S., et al. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S.: Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. 91