Multivoicedness as a tool for expanding school leaders’ understandings and practices for school-based professional development

References

• Bellei, C., Ed., 2018. Nueva Educación Pública Contexto, contenidos y perspectivas de la desmunicipalización. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P., 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18 (1), 32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A.S., et al., 2015. Learning to improve: how America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T. and Köster, F., Eds., 2016. Governing education in a complex world. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.10.1787/9789264255364-en.
   Google Scholar
• Cannata, M., Cohen-Vogel, L., and Sorum, M., 2017. Partnering for improvement: improvement communities and their role in scale up. Peabody journal of education, 92 (5), 569–588. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368633
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, A., Gutiérrez, G., and Flores, C., 2017. Failed regulations and school composition: selective admission practices in Chilean primary schools. Journal of education policy, 1–31. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1312549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. and Muijs, D., 2013. Collaborative school turnaround: A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes. Leadership and policy in schools, 12 (3), 200–226. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.831456
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., 1984. La zona de desarrollo próximo: donde cultura y conocimiento se generan mutuamente. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the study of education and development, 7 (25), 3–18. doi:10.1080/02103702.1984.10822018
   Google Scholar
• Cortez Muñoz, M., et al., forthcoming. Changing school leaders’ conversations about teaching and learning through a peer review process implemented in nine public schools in Chile. In: D. Godfrey, ed.. School peer review for educational improvement and accountability: theory, practice and policy implications. Dordretch: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Park, V., and Kennedy-Lewis, B., 2013. Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use. Journal of educational administration, 51 (3), 341–362. doi:10.1108/09578231311311500
   Google Scholar
• Donoso-Díaz, S., et al., 2015. Nudos críticos del sistema escolar chileno, hipótesis explicativas y propuestas para una nueva arquitectura del sector público. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas Em Educação, 23 (86), 37–71.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., 2011. Learning how to know who: professional learning for expansive practice between organizations. In: S. Ludvigsen, et al., eds.. Learning across sites. Oxon: Routledge, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., 2008. From teams to knots: activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M., et al. (2005). Factors influencing the transfer of good practice, not- tingham. DFES Publications Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/RSG/publicationDetail/Page1/RR615
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, D., forthcoming. School peer review for educational improvement and accountability: theory, practice and policy implications. Dordretch: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J., 1998. The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American psychologist, 53 (1), 5–26. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. and Kulophas, D., 2019. The evolving knowledge base on leadership and teacher professional learning: a bibliometric analysis of the literature, 1960-2018. Professional development in education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1623287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, E.R., 2013. His ideas are in my head: peer-to-peer teacher observations as professional development. Professional development in education, 39 (1), 42–64. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.726202
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. and Timperley, H., 2007. The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77 (1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konkola, R., 2001. Developmental process of internship at polytechnic and boundary-zone activity as a new model for activity (in Finnish). In: T. Tuomi-Gröhn, Y. Engeström, and M. Young, eds.. Between school and work. Oxford: Pergamon. pp 148–186.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., 2015. What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational researcher, 44 (1), 54–61. doi:10.3102/0013189X15570388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J. and Dempster, N., 2009. Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matusov, E., 2007. In search of `the appropriate‘ unit of analysis for sociocultural research. Culture & Psychology, 13 (3), 307–333. doi:10.1177/1354067X07079887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación. 2015. The school management and leadership framework [marco para la buena dirección y liderazgo educativo]. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Educación
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos, C., et al., 2015. Targets, threats and (dis)trust: the managerial troika for public school principals in Chile. Education policy analysis archives, 23 (87), 87. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.2083
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos, C., González, A., and Ehren, M.C.M., forthcoming. From hierarchy and market to hierarchy and network governance in Chile: enhancing accountability, capacity and trust in public education. In: M.C.M. Ehren and J. Baxter, eds.. Trust, accountability, and capacity in education system reform: global perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2017. Education in Chile. Reviews of national policies for education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., and Lloyd, C., 2009. School leadership and student outcomes: identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis iteration [BES].
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V.M. and Timperley, H., 2013. School improvement through theory engagement. In M. K. Lai and S. Kushner eds. A national developmental and negotiated approach to school and curriculum evaluation Vol: 14. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK. pp. 163–177.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R., 2009. Learning, theories of learning, and units of analysis in research. Educational psychologist, 44 (3), 202–208. doi:10.1080/00461520903029030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. and Orland-Barak, L., 2006. Constructing knowledge in professional conversations; the role of beliefs on knowledge and knowing. Learning & instruction, 16 (6), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, J.P., and Montecinos, C. 2017. Structural Reform and Equity in Chilean Schools. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.108
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J., 1991. Voces de la Mente: Un Enfoque Sociocultural para el Estudio de la Acción Mediada. Madrid: Visor.
   Google Scholar