1,209
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

‘Frankly, as far as I can see, it has very little to do with teaching’. Exploring academics’ perceptions of the HEA Fellowships

ORCID Icon
Pages 416-428 | Received 18 Feb 2020, Accepted 11 Jan 2021, Published online: 19 Jan 2021

References

  • Advance HE, 2018. About us. Advance HE. Available from: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/about-us [Accessed 28 Mar 2018].
  • Advance HE, 2020. UK professional standards framework (UKPSF). Available from: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/guidance/teaching-and-learning/ukpsf [Accessed 5 May 2020].
  • Ball, S.J., 2012. Performativity, commodification and commitment: an I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British journal of educational studies, 60 (1), 17–28. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
  • Bell, A.R. and Brooks, C., 2018. What makes students satisfied? A discussion and analysis of the UK’s national student survey. Journal of further and higher education, 42 (8), 1118–1142. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349886
  • Biglan, A., 1973. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of applied psychology, 57 (3), 204–213. doi:10.1037/h0034699
  • Blackmore, J.A., 2005. A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. International journal of educational management, 19 (3), 218–232.
  • Blackmore, P., Blackwell, R., and Edmondsen, M., 2016. Tackling wicked issues: prestige and employment outcomes in the teaching excellence framework. HEPI Occasional Paper 14. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
  • Bostock, S. and Baume, D., 2016. Professions and professionalism in teaching and development. In: D. Baume and C. Popovic, eds. Advancing practice in academic development. Abingdon: Routledge, 32–50.
  • Botham, K., 2017b. The growth of HEA Fellowship – does this impact on an individual’s teaching practice and how can we demonstrate a change in the students’ experience? Educational developments, 18 (3), 4–6.
  • Botham, K.A., 2017a. The perceived impact on academics’ teaching practice of engaging with a higher education institution’s CPD scheme. Innovations in education and teaching international, p. 1–12.
  • Bottrell, D. and Manathunga, C., 2019. Shedding light on the cracks in neoliberal universities. In: D. Bottrell and C. Manathunga, eds. Resisting neoliberalism in higher education volume I: seeing through the cracks. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–33.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Brinkmann, S., 2017. The interview. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. London: Sage, 997–1038.
  • Brown, R., 2015. The marketisation of higher education: issues and ironies. New vistas, 1 (1), 4–9.
  • Buissink, N., et al., 2017. Challenging a measured university from an indigenous perspective: placing ‘manaaki’ at the heart of our professional development programme. Higher education research & development, 36 (3), 569–582. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1288706
  • Burgess, A., Senior, C., and Moores, E., 2018. A 10-year case study on the changing determinants of university student satisfaction in the UK. PLoS ONE, 13 (2), 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192976
  • de Jong, R., et al., 2013. Poldering a teaching qualification system in higher education, a typical Dutch phenomena. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11 (3), 23–40.
  • Di Napoli, R., 2014. Value gaming and political ontology: between resistance and compliance in academic development. International journal for academic development, 19 (1), 4–11. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2013.848358
  • Fielding, A., Dunleavy, P.J., and Langan, A.M., 2010. Interpreting context to the UK’s national student (satisfaction) survey data for science subjects. Journal of further and higher education, 34 (3), 347–368. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2010.484054
  • Fletcher, J.A., 2018. Peer observation of teaching: a practical tool in higher education. The journal of faculty development, 32 (1), 51–64.
  • Fung, D. and Gordon, C., 2016. Rewarding educators and education leaders in research-intensive universities. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Gourlay, L. and Stevenson, J., 2017. Teaching excellence in higher education: critical perspectives. Teaching in higher education, 22 (4), 391–395. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1304632
  • Hall, J., 2010. Theorising resistance to engagement with the professional standards framework. Educational developments, 11 (2), 14–16.
  • HEA SR, 2018. Success rates in HEA accredited CPD schemes 2016-17. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Hibbert, P. and Semler, M., 2015. Faculty development in teaching and learning: the UK framework and current debates. Innovations in education and teaching international, 53 (6), 1–11.
  • Javadi, M. and Zarea, K., 2016. understanding thematic analysis and its pitfall. Journal of client care, 1 (1), 33–39. doi:10.15412/J.JCC.02010107
  • Jorzik, B., 2013. Charta guter Lehre. Grundsätze und Leitlinien für eine bessere Lehrkultur. Essen: Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft.
  • Korstjens, I. and Moser, A., 2018. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. European journal of general practice, 24 (1), 120–124. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
  • Lea, J. and Purcell, N., 2015. Introduction: the scholarship of teaching and learning, the higher education academy, and the UK professional standards framework. In: J. Lea, ed. Enhancing learning and teaching in higher education: engaging with the dimensions of practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 1–16.
  • Lester, S., 2014. Professional competence standards and frameworks in the United Kingdom. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 39 (1), 38–52. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.792106
  • Locke, W., 2014. Shifting academic careers: implications for enhancing professionalism in teaching and supporting learning. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Lucas, N. and Nasta, T., 2010. State regulation and the professionalisation of further education teachers: a comparison with schools and HE. Journal of vocational education and training, 62 (4), 441–445. doi:10.1080/13636820.2010.536249
  • MacDonald, R., 2009. Academic Development. In: M. Tight, et al., eds. The Routledge international handbook of higher education. London: Routledge, 427–439.
  • Manathunga, C. and Bottrell, D., 2019. Prising open the cracks in neoliberal universities. In: C. Manathunga and D. Bottrell, eds. Resisting neoliberalism in higher education volume II: prising open the cracks, springe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–22.
  • McNay, I., 2017. TEF: why and how? Ideological and operational imperatives driving policy: Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(2) 2 doi:10.21100/compass.v10i2.487
  • O’Leary, M., Cui, V., and French, A. 2019, Understanding, recognising and rewarding teaching quality in higher education: an exploration of the impact and implications of the teaching excellence framework. A project report for UCU. London: University and College Union.
  • Parsons, D., et al., 2012. Impact of teaching development programmes in higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Peat, J., 2014. UKPSF: A vehicle for development or hierarchical ladder? Educational developments, 15 (2), 16–18.
  • Peat, J., 2015. Getting down to the nitty-gritty: the trials and tribulations of an institutional professional recognition scheme. Perspectives: policy and practice in higher education, 19 (3), 92–95.
  • Peseta, T.L., 2014. Agency and stewardship in academic development: the problem of speaking truth to power. International journal for academic development, 19 (1), 65–69. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2013.868809
  • Pilkington, R., 2013. Professional dialogues: exploring an alternative means of assessing the professional learning of experienced HE academics. International journal for academic development, 18 (3), 251–263. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2012.717225
  • Pilkington, R., 2018. Annual Review of HEA accredited CPD schemes 2016-17. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Platt, A. and Floyd, S., 2015. Preparing for the UKPSF at Ulster University: an exploration of the role the academic manager plays in engaging and supporting staff preparedness for professional recognition. Educational Developments, 16 (1), 5–10.
  • Scott, P., 2015. Markets and managerialism. Enhancing diversity or promoting conformity? In: R.M.O. Pritchard, M. Klumpp, and U. Teichler, eds. Diversity and excellence in higher education can the challenges be reconciled? Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 3–17.
  • Shaw, R., 2017. Professionalising teaching in HE: the impact of an institutional Fellowship scheme in the UK. Higher education research & development, p. 1–13.
  • Shrives, L., 2012. From postgraduate certificates … to embedding UKPSF at all levels reporting back from SEDA workshops in London, Edinburgh and Birmingham. Academic developments, 13 (3), 1–6.
  • Smart, F., et al., 2019. Electing to speak: professional dialogue in the context of fellowship of the higher education academy. International journal for academic development, p. 1–10.
  • Smith, L., 2019. Annual Review of HEA accredited CPD schemes 2017-18. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Spowart, L., et al., 2016. ‘But I’ve been teaching for 20 years …’: encouraging teaching accreditation for experienced staff working in higher education. International journal for academic development
  • Spowart, L., et al., 2019. “Left with a title but nothing else’: the challenges of embedding professional recognition schemes for teachers within higher education institutions’. Higher education research & development, p. 1–14. Published online: 16 May 2019.
  • Teelken, C., 2012. Compliance or pragmatism: how do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries. Studies in higher education, 37 (3), 271–290. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.511171
  • The Complete University Guide, 2019. University league tables 2019 Available from: https://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings [Accessed 1 Oct 2019]
  • Thornton, T., 2014. Professional recognition: promoting recognition through the higher education academy in a UK higher education institution. Tertiary education and management, 20 (3), 225–238. doi:10.1080/13583883.2014.931453
  • Turner, N., et al., 2013. Measuring the impact of the UK professional standards framework for teaching and supporting learning (UKPSF). Staff and educational development association and the higher education academy. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • UKPSF, 2011. The UK professional standards framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • UKPSF FGN, 2012. Framework guidance note 3: what are the dimensions? York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Van der Sluis, H., 2019. ‘One of those things you need to do?’ Exploring the impact of HEA fellowships on academic identities. Doctoral dissertation. Kingston University.
  • Van der Sluis, H., Burden, P., and Huet, I., 2016. The evaluation of an institutional UKPSF recognition scheme. Educational developments, 17 (1), 5–9.
  • Van der Sluis, H., Burden, P., and Huet, I., 2017. Retrospection and reflection: the emerging influence of an institutional professional recognition scheme on professional development and academic practice in a UK university. Innovations in education and teaching international, 54(2), pp.126-134.
  • Westera, W., 2001. Competences in education: a confusion of tongues. Journal of curriculum studies, 33 (1), 75–88. doi:10.1080/00220270120625

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.