References
- Achinstein, B., 2002. Conflict amid community: the micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers college re cord, 104 (3), 421–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00168.
- Andrews-Larson, C., Wilson, J., and Larbi-Cherif, A., 2017. Instructional improvement and teachers’ collaborative conversations: the role of focus and facilitation. Teachers college record, 119 (2), 1–37.
- Appleton, K., 2002. Science activities that work: perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in science education, 32 (3), 393–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020878121184.
- Atkinson, E., 2000. In defence of ideas, or why ‘what works’ is not enough. British journal of sociology of education, 21 (3), 317–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713655359.
- Ball, S.J., 2015. Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of education policy, 30 (3), 299–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1013271.
- Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology, 26 (1), 611–639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
- Biesta, G., 2015a. Education, measurement and the professions: reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational philosophy and theory, 49 (4), 1–16.
- Biesta, G., 2015b. What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European journal of education, 50 (1), 75–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109.
- Biesta, G., Priestley, M., and Robinson, S., 2015. The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 21 (6), 624–640. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
- Brinkmann, S. and Kvale, S., 2014. InterViews. London: SAGE Publications.
- Brookfield, S., 2009. The concept of critical reflection: promises and contradictions. European journal of social work, 12 (3), 293–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902945215.
- Buchanan, R., 2015. Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 21 (6), 700–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044329.
- Clark, C. and Lampert, M., 1986. The study of teacher thinking: implications for teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 37 (5), 27–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700506.
- Coburn, C.E., 2006. Framing the problem of reading instruction: using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American educational research journal, 43 (3), 343–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003343.
- Day, C., Calderhead, J., and Denicolo, P., 2012. Research on teacher thinking: understanding professional development. New York: Routledge.
- de Lima, J.Á., 2001. Forgetting about friendship: using conflict in teacher communities as a catalyst for school change. Journal of educational change, 2 (2), 97–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017509325276.
- Earl, L.M. and Timperley, H., 2009. Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In: Earl, L.M. and Timperley, H., eds.,Professional learning conversations: challenges in using evidence for improvement. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 1–12.
- Elstad, E., 2009. Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: school accountability in Norway. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 21 (2), 173–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-009-9076-0.
- Engeström, Y., 2005. Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fluid organizational fields. In: Beyerlein, M.M., Beyerlein, S.T. and Kennedy, F.A., eds., Collaborative capital: creating intangible value (Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, vol. 11), Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 307–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-0977(05)11011-5.
- Engestrom, Y. and Kerosuo, H., 2007. From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: the contribution of activity theory. Journal of workplace learning, 19 (6), 336–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710777084.
- Evans, L., 2019. Implicit and informal professional development: what it ‘looks like’, how it occurs, and why we need to research it. Professional development in education, 45 (1), 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1441172.
- Evetts, J., 2003. The Sociological analysis of professionalism. International sociology, 18 (2), 395–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903018002005.
- Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12 (2), 219–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
- Frostenson, M., 2015. Three forms of professional autonomy: de-professionalisation of teachers in a new light. Nordic journal of studies in educational policy, 2015 (2), 28464. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28464.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard: Harvard University Press
- Hammersley, M., 2006. Ethnography: problems and prospects. Ethnography and education, 1 (1), 3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820500512697.
- Hargreaves, A., 2000. Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and teaching, 6 (2), 151–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713698714.
- Helgoy, I. and Homme, A., 2016. Educational reforms and marketization in Norway – a challenge to the tradition of the social democratic, inclusive school? Research in comparative and international education, 11 (1), 52–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631063.
- Hermansen, H., 2017. Knowledge relations and epistemic infrastructures as mediators of teachers’ collective autonomy. Teaching and teacher education, 65, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.003
- Hopmann, S., 2015. ‘Didaktik meets Curriculum’ revisited: historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic journal of studies in educational policy, 2015 (1), 27007. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27007.
- Horn, I.S., 2007. Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the learning sciences, 16 (1), 37–79.
- Horn, I.S. and Little, J.W., 2010. Attending to problems of practice: routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American educational research journal, 47 (1), 181–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158.
- Imants, J., 2002. Restructuring schools as a context for teacher learning. International journal of educational research, 37 (8), 715–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00067-3.
- Imsen, G., Blossing, U., and Moos, L., 2017. Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency: changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 61 (5), 568–583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172502.
- Jeffrey, B., 2002. Performativity and primary teacher relations. Journal of education policy, 17 (5), 531–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210158302.
- Kelchtermans, G., 2006. Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52 (2), 220–237.
- Kelchtermans, G., 2015. Learning from ‘good examples of practice’. Teachers and teaching, 21 (4), 361–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.969103.
- Kennedy, A., 2014. Understanding continuing professional development: the need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional development in education, 40 (5), 688–697. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.955122.
- Kirsten, N., 2020. Persuasion and resistance. Large-scale collaborative professional development as a policy instrument. Journal of curriculum studies, 52 (3), 395–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1702721.
- Koffeman, A. and Snoek, M., 2018. Identifying context factors as a source for teacher professional learning. Professional development in education, 45 (3), 456–471.
- Lahn, L.C., 2012. The use of knowledge sources amongst novice accountants, engineers, nurses and teachers. In: Jensen, K., Lahn L.C. and Nerland M., eds., Professional earning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 109–123.
- Levine, T.H. and Marcus, A.S., 2010. How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and teacher education, 26 (3), 389–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001.
- Little, J.W., 2002. Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and teacher education, 18 (8), 917–946. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5.
- Little, J.W. and Curry, M.W., 2009. Structuring talk about teaching and learning: the use of evidence in protocol-based conversation. In: Earl, L.M. and Timperley, H., eds., Professional learning conversations: challenges in using evidence for improvement. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 29–42.
- Markauskaite, L. and Goodyear, P., 2014. Tapping into the mental resources of teachers’ working knowledge: insights into the generative power of intuitive pedagogy. Learning, culture and social interaction, 3 (4), 237–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.01.001.
- Mausethagen, S. and Smeby, J.-C., 2016. Contemporary education policy and teacher professionalism. In: Dent, M., . Bourgeault, I.L. andDenis, J.-L., eds., The Routledge companion to the professions and professionalism. London: Routledge, pp. 329–343.
- Mausethagen, S., Prøitz, T., and Skedsmo, G., 2017. Teachers’ use of knowledge sources in ‘result meetings’: thin data and thick data use. Teachers and teaching, 24 (1), 1–13.
- McLaughlin, M.W. and Talbert, J.E., 2006. Building school-based teacher learning communities: professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Parker-Jenkins, M., 2018. Problematising ethnography and case study: reflections on using ethnographic techniques and researcher positioning. Ethnography and education, 13 (1), 18–16.
- Saldana, J., 2012. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
- Stoll, L., et al., 2006. Professional learning communities: a review of the literature. Journal of educational change, 7 (4), 221–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8.
- Talbert, J.E., 2010. Professional learning communities at the crossroads: how systems hinder or engender change. In: Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M. and Hopkins, D., eds., Second international handbook of educational change. London/New York: Springer, pp. 555–571.
- Tronsmo, E., 2018. Investigating teachers’ work with multiple knowledge resources in local curriculum development. Pedagogy, culture and society, 27 (4), 555–574.
- Vanderstraeten, R., 2007. Professions in organizations, professional work in education. British journal of sociology of education, 28 (5), 621–635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701505516.
- Vangrieken, K., et al., 2017. Teacher communities as a context for professional development: a systematic review. Teaching and teacher education, 61, 47–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
- Vescio, V., Ross, D., and Adams, A., 2008. A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24 (1), 80–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.