2,677
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Responsive leadership within professional learning networks for sustainable professional learning

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 364-378 | Received 04 Jul 2020, Accepted 01 Apr 2021, Published online: 18 Jul 2021

References

  • Agostini, E., 2016. Lernen im Spannungsfeld von Finden und Erfinden. Zur schöpferischen Genese von Sinn im Vollzug der Erfahrung. [Learning in the tension between finding and inventing. On the creative genesis of meaning in the execution of experience]. Paderborn, DE: Schöningh.
  • Biesta, G.J.J., 2012a. The future of teacher education: evidence, competence or wisdom? RoSE – Research on Steiner Education, 3 (1), 8–21.
  • Biesta, G. J. J., 2012b. Giving Teaching Back to Education: Responding to the Disappearance of the Teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6 (2), 35–49.
  • Brodie, K., 2019. Teacher agency in professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, [online] 1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689523 [Accessed 9 June 2020].
  • Brown, C. and Flood, J., 2019. Formalise, Prioritise and Mobilise: How school leaders secure the benefits of Professional Learning Networks. London, UK: Emerald.
  • Brown, C. and Poortman, C.L., 2018. Networks for learning: effective collaboration for teacher, school and system improvement. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Chapman, C. and Muijs, D., 2014. Does school-to-school collaboration promote school improvement? A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25 (3), 351–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.840319.
  • Easton, L.B., 2008. From professional development to professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 89 (10), 755–761. Available from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/003172170808901014 [Accessed 9 June 2019].
  • European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2018. Teaching careers in europe: access, progression and support. Eurydice report. Luxembourg, LU: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Evans, L., 2019. Implicit and informal professional development: what it ‘looks like’, how it occurs, and why we need to research it. Professional Development in Education, 45 (1), 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1441172.
  • Fullan, M., 2002. The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59 (8), 16–20.
  • Fullan, M., Hill, P., and Rincón-Gallardo, S., 2017. Deep Learning: Shaking the Foundations. Available from: https://npdl.global [Accessed 9 June 2020].
  • Gaertner, C., et al. 2017. Emergence of responsiveness across organizations, networks and clusters from a dynamic capability perspective. JCSM, 9, 7–32.
  • Harris, A. and Chrispeels, J.H., eds., 2006. Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Hartmann, M. and Schratz, M., 2010. Schulleitung als Agentin des Wandels in der autonomen Schulentwicklung? [School management as an agent of change in autonomous school development?]. In: J. Schmich and C. Schreiner, eds. TALIS 2008: Schule als Lernumfeld und Arbeitsplatz. Vertiefende Analysen aus österreichischer Perspektive (BIFIE-Report 4). [TALIS 2008: School as a learning environment and workplace. In-depth analyses from an Austrian perspective]. Graz, AT: Leykam, 111–127.
  • Hubers, M.D. and Poortman, C.L., 2018. Establishing sustainable school improvement through professional learning networks. In: C. Brown and C. Poortman, eds. Networks for learning: effective collaboration for teacher, school and system improvement. London: Routledge, 194–204.
  • Jones, K. and O’Brien, J., eds., 2014. European perspectives on professional development in teacher education. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Jupp, V., 2006. The sage dictionary of social research methods. New York: Sage.
  • Mayring, P., 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]. In: G. Mey and K. Mruck, eds. Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. [Manual of qualitative research in psychology]. Wiesbaden, DE: VS Springer, 601–613.
  • Meyer-Drawe, K., 2013. Lernen braucht Lehren [Learning needs teaching]. In: P. Fauser, et al. eds. Pädagogische Reform. Anspruch – Geschichte – Aktualität. [Educational reform. Aspiration – History – Actuality]. Seelze, DE: Kallmeyer & Klett, 89–97.
  • Mulford, B., 2003. School Leaders: Challenging Roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. OECD Commissioned Paper. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/37133393.pdf [Accessed 9 June 2020].
  • Noonan, J., 2018. An affinity for learning: teacher identity and powerful professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389–407.
  • Nusche, D., et al., 2016. OECD reviews of school resources: Austria. Paris, FR: Pubilishing Paris.
  • O’Brien, J. and Jones, K., 2014. Editorial: professional learning or professional development? Or continuing professional learning and development? Changing terminology, policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 40 (5), 683–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.960688.
  • Ortmann, G., 2010. Organisation, Strategie, Responsivität. [Organisation, Strategy, Responsiveness]. In: G. Schreyögg and P. Conrad, eds. Organisation und Strategie. [Organisation and Strategy], Wiesbaden, DE: Gabler, 1–46.
  • Ortmann, G., 2016. Organisation und Responsivität [Organisation and Responsiveness]. In: B. Althans and J. Engel, eds., Responsive Organisationsforschung. Organisation und Pädagogik [Responsive Organisational Research. Organisations and Pedagogy]. Wiesbaden, DE: VS Springer, 33–59.
  • Osmond-Johnson, P., Campbell, C., and Faubert, B., 2018. Supporting professional learning. The work of Canadian Teacher’s Organization. Professional Development in Education, 45 (1), 17–32. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1486877 [Accessed 9 June 2020].
  • Osmond-Johnson, P., Campbell, C., and Faubert, B., 2019. Supporting professional learning. The work of Canadian Teacher’s Organization. Professional Development in Education, 45 (1), 17–32. Doi https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1486877. [Accessed 9 June 2020].
  • Prenger, R., Poortman, C.L., and Handelzalts, A., 2018. online first. The effects of networked professional learning communities. Journal of Teacher Education. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117753574 [Accessed 9 June 2020].
  • Robinson, V.M.J., Lloyd, C.A., and Rowe, K.J., 2008. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (5), 635–674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509.
  • Roessler, L. and Westfall-Greiter, T., 2018. Austria’s Lerndesigner network: the dynamics of Virtual Professional Learning in interschool networks. In: C. Brown and C.L. Poortman, eds. Networks for learning: effective collaboration for teacher, school and system improvement. London, UK: Routledge, 92–114.
  • Roessler, L. and Schratz, M., 2018. Regionale Schulentwicklung am Beispiel der Modellregion Bildung Zillertal. [Regional school development: the example of the Model region Education Zillertal]. In: E. Zala-Mezö, N.-C. Strauss, and J. Häbig, eds. Dimensionen von Schulentwicklung: Verständnis, Veränderung und Vielfalt eines Phänomens. [Dimensions of school development: Understanding, change and diversity of a phenomenon]. Münster, DE: Waxmann, 83–108.
  • Ronen, I.K., 2019. Educational leadership in the knowledge age ‘from a formal position to a formative perception’: the case of learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 45 (1), 73–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1514526.
  • Rosa, H., 2015. Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. Translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Scharmer, C.O. and Kaufer, K., 2013. Leading from the emerging future: from ego-system to eco-system economies. San Francisco CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Sebastian, J., Huang, H., and Allensworth, E., 2017. Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28 (3), 463–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1319392.
  • Stevenson, H., 2019. Editorial: professional learning – what is the point? Professional Development in Education, 45 (1), 1–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1549306.
  • Timperley, H.S., 2011. Realizing the power of professional learning. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  • UN. 2015. United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability Framework. [Accessed 9 June 2020] Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/8718/-UNEP_environmental,_social_and_economic_sustainability_framework-2015UNEP_Environmental_Social_and_Economic_Sustainability_Framework.pdf.pdf?sequence=2&amp%3BisAllowed=
  • Vanblaere, B. and Devos, G., 2016. Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: a multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 26–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.003.
  • Waldenfels, B., 2006. Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden. [Phenomenology of the Alien. Basic Concepts]. Frankfurt am Main, DE: Suhrkamp.
  • Waldenfels, B., 2007. The question of the other. Hong Kong, CN: Chinese University Press.
  • Walliman, N. and Buckler, S., 2008. Your dissertation in education. London, UK: Sage.
  • Wiesner, C., et al., 2015. School leadership in German speaking countries with an emphasis on Austria: a revision. Ricercazione, 7 (2), 65–90.