References
- Baker‐Doyle, K.J. and Yoon, S.A., 2011. In search of practitioner‐based social capital: a social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in a US‐based STEM professional development program. Professional development in education, 37 (1), 75–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.494450
- Barth, R.S., 2001. Teacher leader. Phi delta kappan, 82 (6), 443–449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170108200607
- Brown, D.B., et al., 2013. Evaluating the efficacy of mathematics, science and technology teacher preparation academies in texas. Professional development in education, 39 (5), 656–677. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.729221
- Bush, T., et al., 2016. Master teachers as teacher leaders: evidence from Malaysia and the Philippines. International studies in educational administration, 43 (2), 19–40.
- Collinson, V., 2012. Leading by earning, learning by leading. Professional development in education, 38 (2), 247–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.657866
- Cooper, K.S., Stanulis, R.N., and Brondyk, S.K., 2016. The teacher leadership process: attempting change within embedded systems. Journal of educational change, 17 (1), 85–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9262-4
- Coram, B.T., 1998. Why social scientists should be interested in luck: a note on some fallacies. Social science quarterly, 79 (1),129–139.
- Council, N.R., 2014. Exploring opportunities for STEM teacher leadership: summary of a convocation. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.
- Creswell, J.W., 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA, USAL Sage.
- Crotty, M., 1998. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
- Darling-Hammond, L., 2017. Teacher education around the world: what can we learn from international practice? European journal of teacher education, 40 (3), 291–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
- Dossey, J.A., McCrone, S.S., and Halvorsen, K.T., 2016, July. Mathematical education in the United States 2016. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the United States National Commission on Mathematics Instruction.
- Du, W., et al., 2019. The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School science and mathematics, 119 (2), 105–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12318
- Erduran, S., 2020. Nature of “STEM”? Science & education, 29 (4), 781–784. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00150-6
- Fairman, J.C. and Mackenzie, S.V., 2015. How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International journal of leadership in education, 18 (1), 61–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.904002
- Feldon, D.F., 2007. The implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy. Educational psychology review, 19 (2), 91–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9009-0
- Galosy, J., et al. (2017). Math and science teacher leadership development: Findings from research and program reviews (Research Report No. 2017–03). BSCS
- Gareis, K.C., et al. (2011). Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Program: Final Report on Comprehensive and 2009–10 Cohort Evaluations. Goodman Research Group.
- Green, A.M. and Kent, A.M., 2016. Developing science and mathematics teacher leaders through a math, science & technology initiative. The professional educator, 40 (1), 1–19.
- Gromet, D.M., Hartson, K.A., and Sherman, D.K., 2015. The politics of luck: political ideology and the perceived relationship between luck and success. Journal of experimental social psychology, 59, 40–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.002
- Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y., 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, 105–117.
- Harfitt, G., 2018, August. The role of the community in teacher preparation: exploring a different pathway to becoming a teacher. Frontiers in education, 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00064.
- Hill, H.C., 2009. Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), pp.470–476
- Hite, R., et al., 2020. Chapter 37: STEM teacher leadership in policy. In: C. Johnson, et al., eds. Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 470–80). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381
- Hite, R. and Milbourne, J., 2018. A proposed conceptual framework for K-12 STEM Master teacher (STEMMaTe) development. Education Sciences, 8 (4), 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040218
- Ho, D. and Tikly, L.P., 2012. Conceptualizing teacher leadership in a Chinese, policy-driven context: a research agenda. School effectiveness and school improvement, 23 (4), 401–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678861
- Holmlund, T.D., Lesseig, K., and Slavit, D., 2018. Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. International journal of STEM education, 5 (1), 32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2
- Hunzicker, J., 2017. From teacher to teacher leader: a conceptual model. International journal of teacher leadership, 8 (2), 1–27.
- Ingersoll, R.M., Merrill, L., and May, H., 2012. Retaining teachers: how preparation matters. Educational leadership, 69 (8), 30–34.
- Ingersoll, R.M. and Perda, D., 2010. Is the supply of mathematics and science teachers sufficient? American educational research journal, 43 (3), 563–594. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210370711
- Jackson, R.R., May 2012. How to think like a master teacher. Educational leadership, 69 (8). http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may12/vol69/num08/How-to-Think-Like-a-Master-Teacher.aspx.
- Johnson, C.C., Peters-Burton, E.E., and Moore, T.J., Eds. 2015. STEM road map: a framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge.
- Joyce, A. and Dzoga, M., 2011. Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education: overcoming challenges in Europe. European Schoolnet.
- Keigher, A., 2010. Teacher attrition and mobility: results from the 2008–09 teacher follow-up survey (NCES 2010–353). National Center for Education Statistics.
- Kelley, T.R. and Knowles, J.G., 2016. A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International journal of STEM education, 3 (1), 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00150-6
- Kennedy, T.J. and Odell, M.R.L., 2014. Engaging students in STEM education. Science education international, 25 (3), 246–258.
- Kilinc, A.Ç., Cemaloglu, N., and Savas, G., 2015. The relationship between teacher leadership, teacher professionalism, and perceived stress. Eurasian journal of educational research, 58, 1–26.
- Kim, Y., Chu, H.E., and Lim, G., 2015. Science curriculum changes and STEM education in East Asia. In: M. Khine, ed. Science education in East Asia (pp. 149–226). Springer.
- Kudenko, I. and Gras-Velázquez, À., 2016. The future of European STEM workforce: what secondary school pupils of Europe think about STEM industry and careers. In: N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, and C. Constantinou, eds. Insights from research in science teaching and learning. Contributions from science education research, (pp. 223–236). Springer.
- Larkin, M., Watts, S., and Clifton, E., 2006. Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 102–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp062oa
- Lauterbach, A.A., 2018. Hermeneutic phenomenological interviewing: going beyond semi-structured formats to help participants revisit experience. The qualitative report, 23 (11), 2883–2898.
- Lee, M.H., Chai, C.S., and Hong, H.Y., 2019. STEM education in Asia Pacific: challenges and development. The Asia-Pacific education researcher, 28 (1–4), 1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0424-z
- Limberg, L., 2000. Phenomenography: a relational approach to research on information needs, seeking and use. New review of information behaviour research, 1, 51–67.
- Livingston, K. and Flores, M.A., 2017. Trends in teacher education: a review of papers published in the European journal of teacher education over 40 years. European journal of teacher education, 40 (5), 551–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1387970
- Marginson, S., et al., 2013. STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
- Martin, W.G. and Gobstein, H., 2015. Generating a networked improvement community to improve secondary mathematics teacher preparation: network leadership, organization, and operation. Journal of teacher education, 66 (5), 482–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115602312
- Mayo, K.E., 2002. Teacher leadership: the master teacher model. Management in education, 16 (3), 29–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206020160030701
- McMillan, J.H. and Schumacher, S., 2001. Research in education: a conceptual introduction. Longman.
- Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd. Sage.
- Nadelson, L.S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M. and Pfiester, J., 2013. Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), pp.157–168
- National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, 2014. STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
- National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, 2007. Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. The National Academies Press.
- National Science Foundation. (2015). Dear colleague letter: NSF STEM teacher leader initiative. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf
- Pedaste, M., et al., 2019. Teacher professional standards to support teacher quality and learning in Estonia. European journal of education, 54 (3), 389–399.
- Reich, J., et al. (2020, July). What’s Lost, What’s Left, What’s Next: Lessons Learned From The Lived Experiences Of Teachers During The Pandemic. https://edarxiv.org/8exp9
- Rinke, C.R., et al., 2016. Characterizing STEM teacher education: affordances and constraints of explicit STEM preparation for elementary teachers. School science and mathematics, 116 (6), 300–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12185
- Rutherford, C., 2006. Teacher leadership and organizational structure. The implications of restructured leadership in an Edison school. Journal of educational change, 7 (1–2), 59–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0013-4
- Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., and Knobloch, N., 2019. Preservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International journal of technology and design education, 29 (3), 493–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
- Science, N. and Council, T. (2018). Charting a Course for Success: America’s Strategy for STEM Education. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf
- Sislian, P., et al., 2015. Collaborative learning in the Finnish educational system: Brazilian teachers’ perspectives. International journal on new trends in education and their implications, 6 (1), 63–69.
- Smith, P.S., Hayes, M.L., and Lyons, K.M., 2017. The ecology of instructional teacher leadership. The journal of mathematical behavior, 46, 267–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.005
- Smylie, M.A. and Eckert, J., 2018. Beyond superheroes and advocacy: the pathway of teacher leadership development. Educational management administration & leadership, 46 (4), 556–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217694893
- StemCON. (2014, June 19). Dr. Linda Gojak, President, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics NCTM at the STEM Conference [Video file]. https://youtu.be/oAhZpfB7Zas
- Tschannen-Moran, M., 2009. Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: the role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational administration quarterly, 45 (2), 217–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08330501
- United States Department of Education. (n.d.). Science, technology, engineering, and math, including computer science. https://www.ed.gov/stem
- Velasco, R.C.L., Hite, R., and Milbourne, J., 2021. Exploring advocacy self-efficacy among K-12 STEM teacher leaders. International journal of science and mathematics education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10176-z
- Walther, J., Sochacka, N.W., and Kellam, N.N., 2013. Quality in interpretive engineering education research: reflections on an example study. Journal of engineering education, 102 (4), 626–659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20029
- Wimpenny, P. and Gass, J., 2000. Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? Journal of advanced nursing, 31 (6), 1485–1492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x
- Yow, J.A. and Lotter, C., 2016. Teacher learning in a mathematics and science inquiry professional development program: first steps in emergent teacher leadership. Professional development in education, 42 (2), 325–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.960593