6,732
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Towards a learning community: understanding teachers’ mental models to support their professional development and learning

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Received 26 Nov 2020, Accepted 20 Jul 2021, Published online: 27 Jul 2021

References

  • Adelman, H.S. and Taylor, L., 2007. Systemic change for school improvement. Journal of educational and psychological consultation, 17(1), 55–77.
  • Avalos, B., 2011. Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10–20.
  • Bernard, H. and Ryan, G., 2010. Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Biesta, G.J.J., Priestly, M., and Robinson, S., 2015. The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and teaching, 21(6), 624–640.
  • Borko, H., 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33(3), 3–15.
  • Bridwell-Mitchell, E.N., 2015. Theorizing teacher agency and reform: how institutionalized instructional practices change and persist. Sociology of education, 88(2), 140–159. doi: 10.1177/0038040715575559.
  • Bullough, R.V., 2007. Professional learning communities and the Eight-Year study. Educational horizons, 85 (3), 168–180. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42923688
  • Burns, D. and Darling-Hammond, L., 2014. Teaching around the world: what can TALIS tell us? Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
  • Camburn, E.M., 2010. Embedded teacher learning opportunities as a site for reflective practice: an exploratory study. American journal of education, 16(4), 463–489.
  • Campbell, C., 2017. Developing teachers’ professional learning: Canadian evidence and experiences in a world of educational improvement. Canadian journal of education, 40 (2), 1–33. Available from: http://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/2446
  • Carroll, J.M. and Olson, J.R., 1988. Mental models in human-computer interaction. M. Helander, ed.. Handbook of human-computer interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 45–65.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. and Richardson, N., 2009. Teacher learning: what matters? Educational leadership, 66 (5), 46–53.
  • DeCuir-Gunby, J., Marshall, P., and Mcculloch, A., 2011. Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: an example from a professional development research project. Field methods, 23(2), 136–155.
  • Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
  • FNBE (Finnish National Board of Education), 2014. National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
  • Fullan, M. and Hargreaves, A., 2016. Bringing the profession back in: call to action. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward.
  • Guskey, T.R., 2002. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.
  • Haim, O., Strauss, S., and Ravid, D., 2004. Relations between EFL teachers’ formal knowledge of grammar and their in-action mental models of children’s minds and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 861–880.
  • Hammernes, K., et al. 2005. How teachers learn and develop. In: L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransfor, eds. Preparing teachers for a changing world. What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 358–389.
  • Hauge, K. and Wan, P., 2019. Teachers’ collective professional development in school: a review study. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–20.
  • James, M. and McCormick, R., 2009. Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 973–982.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. and Byrne, R., 2002. Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 104(9), 646–678.
  • Johnson-Laird, P.N., 1983. Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones, N.A., et al., 2011. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16 (1), 46. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268859
  • Jurasaite-Harbison, E. and Rex, L.A., 2010. School cultures as contexts for informal teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 267–277.
  • Kennedy, A., 2005. Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2), 235–250.
  • Kools, M. and Stoll, L., 2016. What makes a school a learning organisation? OECD Education Working Papers, 137. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Kurdziel, J., Beilfuss, M., and Kurdziel, J., 2003. Research methodologies in science education: mental models and cognition in education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 121–125.
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Libarkin, J.C., Beilfuss, M., and Kurdziel, J.P., 2003. Research methodologies in science education: mental models and cognition in education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51, 121–126.
  • Manrique, M. and Sánchez Abchi, V., 2015. Teachers’ practices and mental models: transformation through reflection on action. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 13–32.
  • Mathieu, J.E., et al., 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (2), 273–283.
  • Mevorach, M. and Strauss, S., 2012. Teacher educators’ in-action mental models in different teaching situations. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 25–41.
  • Moseley, C., Desjean‐Perrotta, B., and Utley, J., 2010. The Draw‐An‐Environment Test Rubric (DAET‐R): exploring pre‐service teachers’ mental models of the environment. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 189–208.
  • Norman, D.A., 1983. Some observations on mental models. In: D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, eds.. Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 7–14.
  • OECD. 2014. TALIS 2013 results: an international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. 2020. TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing.
  • Opfer, V.D. and Pedder, D., 2011. Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407.
  • Opfer, V.D., Pedder, D.G., and Lavicza, Z., 2011. The influence of school orientation to learning on teachers’ professional learning change. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 193–214.
  • Penuel, W.R., Fishman, B.J., and Gallagher, L.P., 2007. What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.
  • Postholm, M.B., 2012. Teachers’ professional development: a theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405–429.
  • Postholm, M.B., Boylan, M., and Boylan, M., 2018. Teachers’ professional development in school: a review study. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–22.
  • Rouse, W.B. and Morris, N.M., 1986. On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349–363.
  • Sales, A., Traver, J.A., and García, R., 2011. Action research as a school-based strategy in intercultural professional development for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 911–919..
  • Schreier, M., 2014. Varianten qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse: ein Wegweiser im Dickicht der Begrifflichkeiten. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, 15(1), 1–27.
  • Senge, P.M., 1990. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
  • Senge, P.M., 1998. The practice of innovation. Leader to Leader, 9(9), 16–22.
  • Senge, P.M. 2006. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Revised and updateded, New York: Doubleday.
  • Senge, P.M., et al., 2012. Schools that learn: a fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Crown Business.
  • Statistics in Finland, 2020. Peruskoulujen määrä jatkoi laskuaan, oppilaitokset aiempaa suurempia. Available from: https://www.stat.fi/til/kjarj/2019/kjarj_2019_2020-02-12_tie_001_fi.html [Accessed 3 Nov 2020.
  • Stoll, L. and Kools, M., 2017. The school as a learning organisation: a review revisiting and extending a timely concept. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(1), 2–17.
  • Taajamo, M. and Puhakka, E., 2019. Opetuksen ja oppimisen kansainvälinen tutkimus TALIS 2018. Perusopetuksen vuosiluokkien 7-9 ensituloksia, osa 1. Finnish National Agency for Education. Available from: https://www.oph.fi/fi/tilastot-ja-julkaisut/julkaisut/opetuksen-ja-oppimisen-kansainvalinen-tutkimus-talis-2018 [Accessed 3 Oct 2020
  • Thomas, J.A., Pedersen, J.E., and Finson, K., 2001. Validating the draw-a-science-teacher-test checklist (DASTT-C): exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(4), 295–310.
  • Timperly, H., 2011. Realizing the power of professional learning. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Zwart, R.C., et al., 2009. Which characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students? Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (3), 243–257.