576
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Formal and informal professional development during different Covid-19 periods: the role of teachers’ career stages

ORCID Icon, , &
Received 16 Apr 2022, Accepted 13 Jan 2023, Published online: 15 Feb 2023

References

  • Antoniou, P. and Kyriakides, L., 2013. A dynamic integrated approach to teacher professional development: impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behavior and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.001.
  • Asad, M.M., et al. (2021). Techno-pedagogical skills for 21st century digital classrooms: an extensive literature review. Education Research International, 2021. Retrieved December 22, 2022 from 22 December 2022 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/edri/2021/8160084/
  • Avidov-Ungar, O., 2016. A model of professional development: teachers’ perceptions of their professional development. Teacher and teaching: theory and practice, 22 (6), 653–669. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1158955.
  • Avidov-Ungar, O., et al., 2022. Professional development processes of teachers in different career stages and in different Covid-19 pandemic periods. In: E. Langran, eds. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. San Diego, CA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 312–318. [Retrieved October 15, 2022 from 15 October 2022] https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/220754/.
  • Avidov-Ungar, O. and Herscu, O., 2020. Formal professional development as perceived by teachers in different professional life periods. Professional Development in Education, 46 (5), 833–844. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1647271.
  • Avidov-Ungar, O. and Herscu, O., 2020. Formal professional development as perceived by teachers in different professional life periods. Professional Development in Education, 46 (5), 833–844‏.
  • Avidov-Ungar, O. and Shamir-Inbal, T., 2017. ICT Coordinators ‘ TPACK- based leadership knowledge in their roles as agents of change. Journal of Information Technology Education, 16 (6), 169–188. doi:10.28945/3699.
  • Avidov-Ungar, O., Shamir- Inbal, T., and Blau, I., 2020. Typology of digital leadership roles tasked with integrating new technologies into teaching: insights from metaphor analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1809035.
  • Azorín, C., Harris, A., and Jones, M., 2020. Taking a distributed perspective on leading professional learning networks. School Leadership & Management, 40 (2–3), 111–127. doi:10.1080/13632434.2019.1647418.
  • Blau, I. and Shamir-Inbal, T., 2018. Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46 (2), 315–336. doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y.
  • Booth, J., et al., 2021. Mid-career teachers: a mixed methods scoping study of professional development, career progression and retention. Education Sciences, 11 (6), 1–33. doi:10.3390/educsci11060299.
  • Borko, H., 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 3–15.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Carrillo, C. and Flores, M.A., 2020. COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4), 466–487. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184.
  • Caspi, A. and Blau, I., 2008. Social presence in online discussion groups: testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11 (3), 323–346. doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9054-2.
  • Caspi, A. and Blau, I., 2011. Collaboration and psychological ownership: how does the tension between the two influence perceived learning? Social Psychology of Education, 14 (2), 283–298. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9141-z.
  • Cheng, X., 2020. Challenges of “School’s out, but class’s on” to school education: practical exploration of Chinese schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 5 (2), 501–516. doi:10.15354/sief.20.ar043.
  • Collins, K.M., 2021. Chi-square automatic interaction detection analysis of qualitative data. The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis. Routledge, 69–76.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., and Gardner, M., 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606743.pdf [Accessed 7 February 2022].
  • Day, C., et al., 2006. Variations in the work and lives of teachers: relative and relational effectiveness. Teachers and teaching, 12 (2), 169–192. doi:10.1080/13450600500467381.
  • Day, C., 2008. Committed for life? Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 9 (3), 243–260. doi:10.1007/s10833-007-9054-6.
  • Day, C., Sammons, P., and Gu, Q., 2008. Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies in research on teachers’ lives, work, and effectiveness: from integration to synergy. Educational Researcher, 37 (6), 330–342. doi:10.3102/0013189X08324091.
  • Derrick, M.G., 2003. Creating environments conducive for lifelong learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003 (100), 5–18.
  • Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38 (3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
  • Dibra, G., et al., 2014. Learning among adults. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 10 (13). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236409016.pdf
  • Dreyfus, S.E., 2004. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 24 (3), 177–181. doi:10.1177/0270467604264992.
  • Dubovi, I. and Tabak, I., 2020. An empirical analysis of knowledge co-construction in YouTube comments. Computers & Education, 156, 103939. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103939
  • Fakis, A., et al., 2014. Quantitative analysis of qualitative information from interviews: a systematic literature review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8 (2), 139–161. doi:10.1177/1558689813495111.
  • Furner, C. and McCulla, N., 2019. An exploration of the influence of school context, ethos and culture on teacher career-stage professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 45 (3), 505–519. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1427134.
  • Guskey, T.R. and Yoon, K.S., 2009. What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90 (7), 495–500. doi:10.1177/003172170909000709.
  • Hadad, S., et al., 2021. Professional development of code and robotics teachers through small private online course (SPOC): teacher centrality and pedagogical strategies for developing computational thinking of students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59 (4), 763–791. doi:10.1177/0735633120973432.
  • Hadad, S., Meishar-Tal, H., and Blau, I., 2020. The parents’ tale: why parents resist the educational use of smartphones at schools? Computers & Education, 157, 103–125. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103984
  • Hayak, M. and Avidov-Ungar, O., 2020. The integration of digital game-based learning into the instruction: teachers’ perceptions at different career stages. TechTrends, 64 (6), 887–898. doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00503-6.
  • Hodges, C., et al. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. In: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning [Accessed 7 February 2022].
  • Holme, T.A., 2020. Journal of chemical education call for papers: special issue on insights gained while teaching chemistry in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97 (5), 1226–1227. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00378.
  • Huberman, M., 1989. The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers college record, 91 (1), 31–57. doi:10.1177/016146818909100107.
  • Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M., 2016. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business horizons, 59 (4), 441–450.
  • Kappas, S. and Tsolis, D., 2018. Greek university MOOCs and secondary education teachers’ training. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17 (5), 26–46. doi:10.26803/ijlter.17.5.3.
  • Kizilcec, R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., and Maldonado, J.J., 2017. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
  • Koukis, N. and Jimoyiannis, A., 2019. MOOCS for teacher professional development: exploring teachers’ perceptions and achievements. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16 (1), 74–91. doi:10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0081.
  • Lockee, B.B., 2021. Shifting digital, shifting context: (re)considering teacher professional development for online and blended learning in the COVID-19 era. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69 (1), 17–20. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09836-8.
  • Loehnert, S., 2010. About statistical analysis of qualitative survey data. International Journal of Quality, Statistics, and Reliability, 2010, 12. doi:10.1155/2010/849043.
  • Lynn, S.K., 2002. The winding path: understanding the career cycle of teachers. The Clearing House, 75 (4), 179–182. doi:10.1080/00098650209604926.
  • Masuda, A.M., Ebersole, M.M., and Barrett, D., 2013. A qualitative inquiry: teachers’ attitudes and willingness to engage in professional development experiences at different career stages. Delta Kappa Gamma bulletin, 79 (2), 6: https://bit.ly/32CQYmK [Accessed 7 February 2022].
  • Nodoushan, M.A.S., 2012. Self-regulated learning (SRL): emergence of the RSRLM model. Online Submission, 6 (3), 1–16.
  • Oplatka, I. and Tako, E., 2009. Schoolteachers’ constructions of desirable educational leadership: a career-stage perspective. School Leadership and Management, 29 (5), 425–444. doi:10.1080/13632430903152286.
  • Postholm, M.B., 2012. Teachers’ professional development: a theoretical review. Educational Research, 54 (4), 405–429. doi:10.1080/00131881.2012.734725.
  • Reimers, F., et al., 2020. Supporting the continuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. OECD, 1 (1), 1–38. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/supporting-the-continuation-of-teaching-and-learning-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf
  • Salmons, J., 2019. Learning to collaborate, collaborating to learn: engaging students in the classroom and online. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Sancar, R., Atal, D., and Deryakulu, D., 2021. A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
  • Shamir-Inbal, T. and Blau, I., 2020. Micro-learning in designing professional development for ICT teacher leaders: the role of self-regulation and perceived learning. Professional Development in Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/19415257.2020.1763434.
  • Shamir-Inbal, T. and Blau, I., 2021a. Characteristics of pedagogical change in integrating digital collaborative learning and their sustainability in a school culture: e-CSAMR framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37 (3), 825–838. doi:10.1111/jcal.12526.
  • Shamir-Inbal, T. and Blau, I. (2021b). Facilitating emergency remote K-12 teaching in computing-enhanced virtual learning environments during COVID-19 pandemic: blessing or curse? Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0735633121992781 [Accessed 7 February 2022].
  • Sharpe, D., 2015. Chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 20 (1), 8: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol20/iss1/8/ [Accessed 7 February 2023].
  • Stepchenkova, S., 2012. Content analysis. In: L. Dwyer, A. Gill, and N. Seetaram, eds. Handbook of research methods in tourism. Edward Elgar, 443–458.
  • Thomas, A., 2007. Youth online: Identity and literacy in the digital age. Vol. 19. Peter Lang.
  • Toikkanen, T. and Leinonen, T., 2017. The code ABC MOOC: Experiences from a coding and computational thinking MOOC for Finnish primary school teachers. Emerging research practice, and policy on computational thinking, 239–248.
  • Tondeur, J., et al., 2016. Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT-integration in education. Educational technology & society, 19 (3), 110–120.
  • Trikoilis, D. and Papanastasiou, E.C., 2020. The potential of research for professional development in isolated settings during the covid-19 crisis and beyond. Journal of technology and teacher education, 28 (2), 295–300.
  • Trust, T., et al., 2020. #RemoteTeaching & #RemoteLearning: educator tweeting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of technology and teacher education, 28 (2), 151–159.
  • Trust, T., Krutka, D.G., and Carpenter, J.P., 2016. “Together we are better”: professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & education, 102, 15–34. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
  • Wnuk, S., 2015. Early career teacher attrition: intentions of teachers beginning. Teaching education, 26 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10476210.2014.996746.
  • Wray, M., et al., 2008. Investigating perceptions of teaching online and f2f. Academic exchange quarterly, 12 (4), 243–248.
  • Yin, R.K., 2015. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York and London: Guilford publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.