Identifying the theoretical foundations of coaching as a form of ongoing professional development in early childhood education: a meta-narrative review

References

• Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B.A., and Dekkers, J., 2014. Maximizing the potential of mentoring: a framework for pre-service teacher education. Mentoring & tutoring: partnership in learning, 22 (3), 224–239. doi:10.1080/13611267.2014.926662.
   Google Scholar
• Artman-Meeker, K., et al., 2015. Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Topics in early childhood special education, 35 (3), 183–196. doi:10.1177/0271121415595550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., 2004. Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33 (3), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, M., et al., 2018. Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: a conceptual analysis to inform research and practice. Professional development in education, 44 (1), 120–139. doi:10.1080/19415257.2017.1306789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsek, A., et al., 2020. A meta-analysis and systematic review of the associations between professional development of early childhood educators and children’s outcomes. Early childhood research quarterly, 53, 217–248. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. and Hollingsworth, H., 2002. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and teacher education, 18 (8), 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crafton, L. and Kaiser, E., 2011. The language of collaboration: dialogue and identity in teacher professional development. Improving schools, 14 (2), 104–116. doi:10.1177/1365480211410437.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., and Gardner, M., 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Pao Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M., 2009. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38 (3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L.M. and Pak, K., 2017. Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory into practice, 56 (1), 3–12. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D.K., Freiberg, J.B., and Barnes, E.M., 2011. Why are so few interventions really effective? A call for fine-grained research methodology. Handbook of early literacy research, 3, 337–357.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C., 2014. Learning teaching practices: the role of critical mentoring conversations in teacher education. Journal of education and training studies, 2 (2), 151–166. doi:10.11114/jets.v2i2.343.
   Google Scholar
• Egert, F., Fukkink, R.G., and Eckhardt, A.G., 2018. Impact of in-service professional development programs for early childhood teachers on quality ratings and child outcomes: a meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 88 (3), 401–433. doi:10.3102/0034654317751918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elek, C. and Page, J., 2019. Critical features of effective coaching for early childhood educators: a review of empirical research literature. Professional development in education, 45 (4), 567–585. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1452781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S.J., 2012. Coaching: an overview. In: S.J. Fletcher and C.A. Mullen, eds. The SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education. London: SAGE, 24–41.
   Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R.G. and Lont, A., 2007. Does training matter? A meta-analysis and review of caregiver training studies. Early childhood research quarterly, 22 (3), 294–311. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfeld, S., 2016. The role of preschool in promoting children’s healthy development: evidence from an Australian population cohort. Early childhood research quarterly, 35, 40–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L.T., Doerr, H.M., and Lewis, C.C., 2014. Mathematics teachers’ learning: a conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 17 (1), 5–36. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Thomas, J., and Oliver, S., 2012. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic reviews, 1 (1), 28. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., et al., 2005. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social science & medicine, 61 (2), 417–430. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T.R., 2002. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers & teaching theory & practice, 8 (3), 381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
   Google Scholar
• Hamre, B.K., Downer, J.T., Jamil, F.M., and Pianta, R.C., 2012. Enhancing teachers’ intentional use of effective interactions with children: designing and testing professional development interventions. In: R.C. Pianta, W.S. Barnett, L.M. Justice, and S.M. Sheridan, eds. Handbook of early childhood education. New York: Guilford Press, 507–532.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H., Beisiegel, M., and Jacob, R., 2013. Professional development research: consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational researcher, 42 (9), 476–487. doi:10.3102/0013189X13512674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isner, T., et al., 2011. Coaching in early care and education programs and quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS): identifying promising features. Washington, D.C: Child Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. and Showers, B., 2002. Student achievement through staff development. In: B. Joyce and B. Showers, eds. Designing training and peer coaching: our needs for learning. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., 2014. Understanding continuing professional development: the need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional development in education, 40 (5), 688–697. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.955122.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M.M., 2016. How does professional development improve teaching? Review of educational research, 86 (4), 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.A., Blazar, D., and Hogan, D., 2018. The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: a meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of educational research, 88 (4), 547–588. doi:10.3102/0034654318759268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochmiller, C.R., 2021. Guest editorial: Coaching for improvement in education: new insights and enduring questions. International journal of mentoring & coaching in education, 10 (4), 393–398. doi:10.1108/IJMCE-12-2021-110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart-Findling, M.J., 2016. The relationship between two types of teacher professional development and head start student math outcomes. Doctoral dissertation. Northcentral University Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., Lead, D., and Towler, C., 2010. Coaching for teaching and learning: a practical guide for schools. Guidance report. CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, A.J. and Seyarto, M., 2023. Linking professional development to classroom quality: differences by ECE sector. Early childhood research quarterly, 64, 266–277. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen-Brown, J., et al., 2017. The effects of language- and literacy-focused professional development on early educators and children: a best-evidence meta-analysis. Early childhood research quarterly, 38, 97–115. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A., 2005. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A. and Mittapalli, K., 2010. Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 145–167.
   Google Scholar
• Melhuish, E., et al., 2015. Review of research on impact of ECEC CARE: a review of research on the effects of early childhood education and care (ECEC) upon child development. Curriculum and quality analysis and impact review (CARE) or European early childhood education and care. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/16443/.
   Google Scholar
• Mendive, S., et al., 2015. Opening the black box: intervention fidelity in a randomized trial of a preschool teacher professional development program. Journal of educational psychology, 108 (1), 130–145. doi:10.1037/edu0000047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J., 2003. Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of transformative education, 1 (1), 58–63. doi:10.1177/1541344603252172.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, T., 2021. Practice-based coaching to impact early childhood teacher candidate uptake of evidence-based practice in clinical internship. In: P.E. Bernhardt, T.R. Conway, and G.M. Richardson, eds. Engaged clinical practice: preparing mentor teachers and university-based educators to support teacher candidate learning and development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A., and Saldaña, J., 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S.B. and Dickinson, D.K., 2010. Handbook of early literacy research. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. and Pedder, D., 2011. Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81 (3), 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 2004. Realist evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M.B., 2012. Teachers’ professional development: a theoretical review. Educational research, 54 (4), 405–429. doi:10.1080/00131881.2012.734725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S., Brown, C., and Poblete, X., 2020. A systematic review of the evidence base for professional learning in early years education (the PLEYE review). Review of education, 8 (1), 156–188. doi:10.1002/rev3.3178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., 1993. Theory unmasked: the uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Research in nursing & health, 16 (3), 213–218. doi:10.1002/nur.4770160308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., et al., 2012. Mapping the mixed methods–mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of mixed methods research, 6 (4), 317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, R.E., 2015. An analytic study of the professional development research in early childhood education. Early education and development, 26 (8), 1057–1085. doi:10.1080/10409289.2015.1009335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, R.E., et al., 2018. What happens during language and literacy coaching? Coaches’ reports of their interactions with educators. Early education and development, 29 (6), 852–872. doi:10.1080/10409289.2018.1487222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherbourne, C.M., 2016. What lies beneath the coaching process: coaching experiences of early childhood educators. Doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S.M., et al., 2009. Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early education and development, 20 (3), 377–401. doi:10.1080/10409280802582795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, S. and Fletcher-Wood, H., 2021. Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review. School effectiveness and school improvement, 32 (1), 47–63. doi:10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H., 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, P.A., et al., 2012. Characterizing key features of the early childhood professional development literature. Infants & young children, 25 (3), 188–212. doi:10.1097/IYC.0b013e31825a1ebf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., et al., 2007. Teacher professional learning and development: best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• van Nieuwerburgh, C., 2012. Coaching in education: getting better results for students, educators, and parents. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R. and Knafl, K., 2005. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of advanced nursing, 52 (5), 546–553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, D., Waniganayake, M., and Hadley, F., 2020. Insights on mentoring practices within the early childhood sector in Singapore. In: M. Gasper and R. Walker, eds. Mentoring and coaching in early childhood education. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., et al., 2013. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC medicine, 11 (20). doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-20.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., et al., 2022. Coaching early childhood teachers: a systematic review of its effects on teacher instruction and child development. Review of education, 10 (1), e3343. doi:10.1002/rev3.3343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K.S., et al., 2007. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Issues & Answers Report, REL No. 33.
   Google Scholar