Using Pre-Milestone B Data to Predict Schedule Duration for Defense Acquisition Programs

References

• Birchler, D., Christle, G., & Groo, E. (2011). Cost implications of design/build concurrency. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 18(3), 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. E., White, E. D., Ritschel, J. D., & Seibel, M. J. (2015). Time phasing aircraft R&D using the Weibull and beta distributions. Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics, 8(3), 150–164. doi:10.1080/1941658X.2015.1096219
   Google Scholar
• Cashman, W. M. (1995). Why schedules slip: Actual reasons for schedule problems across large Air Force system development efforts ( Master’s thesis). Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (a302627), Fort Belvoir, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics, 19, 15–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defense Acquisition University. (2015, November 30). IOC definition. Retrieved from http://dap.dau.mil/glossary/Pages/2048.aspx/
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, D., Eveleigh, T. J., Holzer, T. H., & Sarkani, S. (2013). Improving program success through systems engineering tools in the pre-milestone B acquisition phase. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 20(3), 283–308.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, J. A., & Smith, G. K. (1990). An analysis of weapon system acquisition schedules (R-3937-ACQ). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Fichter, L. S., Arnold, D. K., & Allen, M. K. (1992). DoD weapon system schedule risk profiles based on an analysis of schedule data presented in the December 1991 selected acquisition reports (SARs) ( TO-92-007). Santa Barbara, CA: Tecolote Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2011a). Space acquisitions: DoD delivering new generations of satellites, but space system acquisition challenges remain ( GAO Publication No. 11-590T). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2011b). Defense acquisitions: Assessments of selected weapon programs ( GAO Publication No. 11-233SP). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. L. (2015, September). Reinventing the aerospace nation. Retrieved from http://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/aboutus/AFASpeechesTranscripts/091415-Secretary-James_ReinventingtheAerospaceNation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McClave, J. T., Benson, P. G., & Sincich, T. (2008). Statistics for business and economics (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Monaco, J. V., & White, E. D. (2005). Investigating schedule slippage. Defense Acquisition Review Journal, 12(2), 176–193.
   Google Scholar
• Monaco, J. V., & White, E. D. (2006). Extending cost growth estimation to predict schedule risk. The Journal of Cost Analysis & Management, 8(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/15411656.2006.10462253
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2008). Pre-Milestone A and early-phase systems engineering: A retrospective review and benefits for future air force acquisition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtseim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, L. J. (2000). Joint strike fighter acquisition: Development schedule should be changed to reduce risks ( GAO/T-NSIAD-00-132). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sedmak, A. G., Taylor, Z. S., & Riski, W. A. (2015). Establishing the technical foundation: Material solution analysis is more than selecting an alternative. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 22(4), 364–393.
   Google Scholar
• Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. (2015). Department of Defense instruction (DoDI) 5000.02. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, E. J., Gallagher, M. A., & White, E. D. (2004). R&D budget-driven cost and schedule overruns. The Journal of Cost Analysis & Management, 6(1), 80–97. doi:10.1080/15411656.2004.10462249
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Publishing Office. (2006). United States code, Supplement 4, Title 10—Armed forces. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar