Women’s constructions of heterosexual non-romantic sex and the implications for sexual health

References

• Allen, L. (2003). Girls want sex, boys want love: Resisting dominant discourses of (hetero) sexuality. Sexualities, 6(2), 215–236.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. (2008). The ideology of choice. Overstating progress and hiding injustice in the lives of young women: Findings from a study in North Queensland, Australia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31(1), 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. (2010). Claiming volition and evading victimhood: Post-feminist obligations for young women. Feminism & Psychology, 20(2), 186–204. doi:10.1177/0959353509359142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L.Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R.K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397. doi:10.1080/00224490802398381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M.A., & Farvid, P. (2010). Sexual ethics and young women’s accounts of heterosexual casual sex. Sexualities, 13(3), 377–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (2003). The ‘fair deal’? Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6(2), 237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, T.S. (2001). Pretending to experience orgasm as a communicative act: How, when, and why some sexually experienced college women pretend to experience orgasm during various sexual behaviors (Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas, USA). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304698517?accountid=14723, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database. (Order No. 3049511)
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B. (1980). A feminist sexual politics: Now you see it, now you don’t. Feminist Review, 5(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• de Visser, R.O., Smith, A.M.A., Rissel, C.E., Richters, J., & Grulich, A.E. (2003). Sex in Australia: Safer sex and condom use among a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1996). Whose orgasm is this anyway? “Sex work” in long-term heterosexual couple relationships. In J. Weeks & J. Holland (Eds.), Sexual cultures: Communities, values and intimacy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women’s engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 114–131. doi:10.1177/0959353509351854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2006). ‘Most of us guys are raring to go anytime, anyplace, anywhere’: Male and female sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles, 55(5), 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, C. (1997). The politics of sex research and constructions of female sexuality: What relevance to sexual health work with young women? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(3),615–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality: An interview. Oxford Literary Review, 4(2), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2011). Romantic partners, friends, friends with benefits, and casual acquaintances as sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 48(6), 554–564. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.535623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N., Doherty, M., & McPhillips, K. (2001). “If it’s not on, it’s not on”- or is it? Discursive constraints on women’s condom use. Gender & Society, 15(6), 917–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (1999). Subject to romance – heterosexual passivity as an obstacle to women initiating condom use. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(2), 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N., McPhillips, K., & Braun, V. (1999). Interruptus coitus: Heterosexuals accounting for intercourse. Sexualities, 2(1), 35–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2007a). Gender and the media. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2007b). Postfeminist media culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. doi:10.1177/1367549407075898
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60. doi:10.1177/0959353507084950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2011). New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Gill, R. (2011). Spicing it up: Sexual entrepreneurs and the sex inspectors. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1990a). ‘Don’t die of ignorance’ – I nearly died of embarrassment: Condoms in context. London: The Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1990b). Sex, gender and power: Young women’s sexuality in the shadow of AIDS. Sociology of Health & Illness, 12(3),336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1991a). Between embarrassment and trust: Young women and the diversity of condom use. In P. Aggleton, G. Hart, & P. Davies (Eds.), AIDS: Responses, interventions and care (pp. 127–148). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1992a). Pressure, resistance, empowerment: Young women and the negotiation of safer sex. In P. Aggleton, P. Davies, & G. Hart (Eds.), AIDS: Rights, risk and reason (pp. 142–162). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1992b). Risk, power and the possibility of pleasure: Young women and safer sex. AIDS Care, 4(3), 273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1991). Pressured pleasure: Young women and the negotiation of sexual boundaries. London: The Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: The Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (1984). Sex research and the construction of sexuality: A tool of male supremacy? Women’s Studies International Forum, 7(1), 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S.M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 113–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, J. (2009). An “arranged love” marriage: India’s neoliberal turn and the Bollywood wedding culture industry. Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(2), 221–233. doi:10.1111/j.1753–9137.2009.01036.x
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, C. (2007). ‘Alternative’ narratives of young people’s heterosexual experiences in the UK. Sexualities, 10(5), 539–558.
   Google Scholar
• McPhillips, K., Braun, V., & Gavey, N. (2001). Defining (hetero)sex: How imperative is the “coital imperative”? Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(2), 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikach, S.M., & Bailey, J.M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(3), 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S.M., & Rosenthal, D.A. (1999). Contemporary youths’ negotiations of romance, love, sex, and sexual disease. In V.C. de Munch (Ed.), Romantic love and sexual behavior: Perspectives from the social sciences (Vol. 101, pp. 233–247). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Australian women talk about non-romantic sex. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C.L., & Shippee, S.K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47(6), 552–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. (2006). Personal control, self-efficacy in sexual negotiation, and contraceptive risk among adolescents: The role of gender. Sex Roles, 54(9), 615–625. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, E. (2005). Young women, feminist identities and neo-liberalism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(6), 495–508. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., & Walkerdine, V. (2008). Regulating the abject. Feminist Media Studies, 8(3), 227–246. doi:10.1080/14680770802217279
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D., Gifford, S., & Moore, S. (1998). Safe sex or safe love: Competing discourses? AIDS Care, 10(1), 35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharff, C. (2011). Disarticulating feminism: Individualization, neoliberalism and the othering of ‘Muslim women’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18(2), 119–134. doi:10.1177/1350506810394613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, F.J. (1999). Femininities in flux? Young women, heterosexuality and (safe) sex. Sexualities, 2(3), 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Tiefer, L. (2004). Sex is not a natural act & other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, D.L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J.M. (1997). Fantasies of femininity: Reframing the boundaries of sex. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, D. (2001). The importance of love and understanding: Speculation on romance in safe sex health promotion. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(2), 241–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, J., (1985). Sexuality and its discontents: Meanings, myths & modern sexualities. London & Melbourne, VIC: Routledge & K. Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wentland, J.J., Herold, E.S., Desmarais, S., & Milhausen, R.R. (2009). Differentiating highly sexual women from less sexual women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18(4), 169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M.W. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 23, 131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A.C. (2004). So full of myself as a chick: Goth women, sexual independence, and gender egalitarianism. Gender & Society, 18(3), 328–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (1997). The limitations of trust in intimate relationships: Constructions of trust and sexual risk taking. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (1998). Constructions of sexual activity and their implications for sexual practice: Lessons for sex education. Journal of Health Psychology, 3(3), 383–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton, T., & Aggleton, P. (1991). Condoms, coercion and control: Heterosexuality and the limits to HIV/AIDS education. In P. Aggleton, G. Hart, & P. Davies (Eds.), AIDS: Responses, interventions and care (pp. 149–156). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/topics/sexual_health/en/
   Google Scholar