1,898
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

A systematic review of research on attitudes towards and willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy among emerging adults: methodological issues considered

&
Pages 4-23 | Received 14 Dec 2016, Accepted 10 Apr 2017, Published online: 24 Apr 2017

References

  • *Billingham, R. E. (2008). College women’s willingness to participate in alternative marital and family forms: 1986 and 2003. College Student Journal, 42, 659–664.
  • *Billingham, R. E., Perera, P. B., & Ehlers, N. A. (2005). College women’s rankings of the most undesirable marriage and family forms. College Student Journal, 39, 749–752.
  • *Billingham, R. E., & Sack, A. R. (1986). Gender differences in college students’ willingness to participate in alternative marriage and family relationships. Family Perspective, 20, 37–44.
  • *Burleigh, T. J., Rubel, A. N., & Meegan, D. V. (2016). Wanting ‘the whole loaf’: Zero-sum thinking about love is associated with prejudice against consensual non-monogamists. Psychology & Sexuality, 1–17. doi:10.1080/19419899.2016.1269020
  • *Burris, C. T. (2014). Torn between two lovers? Lay perceptions of polyamorous individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 258–267. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.779311
  • *Cohen, M. T. (2016). The perceived satisfaction derived from various relationship configurations. Journal of Relationships Research, 7. doi:10.1017/jrr.2016.12
  • *Cohen, M. T., & Wilson, K. (2017). Development of the Consensual Non-Monogamy Attitude Scale (CNAS). Sexuality & Culture, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12119-016-9395-5
  • *Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.15302415.2012.01286.x
  • *Edwards, M., & Stinnett, N. (1974). Perceptions of college students concerning alternate life styles. The Journal of Psychology, 87, 143–156. doi:10.1080/00223980.1974.9915685
  • *Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. (2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 45–53. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193
  • *Hutzler, K. T., Giuliano, T. A., Herselman, J. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2016). Three’s a crowd: Public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 7, 69–87. doi:10.1080/19419899.2015.1004102
  • *Johnson, S. M., Giuliano, T. A., Herselman, J. R., & Hutzler, K. T. (2015). Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 6, 325–339. doi:10.1080/19419899.2014.1001774
  • *Jurich, A. P., & Jurich, J. A. (1975). Alternative family forms: Preferences of nonparticipants. Home Economics Research Journal, 3, 260–265. doi:10.1177/1077727X7500300404
  • *Matsick, J. L., Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., & Rubin, J. D. (2014). Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 339–348. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.832934
  • *Moors, A. C., Conley, T. D., Edelstein, R. S., & Chopik, W. J. (2015). Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 222–240. doi:10.1177/0265407514529065
  • *Rao, V. P., & Rao, V. N. (1980). Alternatives in intimacy, marriage, and family lifestyles. Alternative Lifestyles, 3, 485–498. doi:10.1007/BF01082945
  • *Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal Für Psychologie, 22, 1–23.
  • *Spanier, G. B., & Cole, C. L. (1975). Mate swapping: Perceptions, value orientations, and participation in a midwestern community. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4, 143–159. doi:10.1007/BF01541079
  • *Stinnett, N., & Taylor, S. (1976). Parent-child relationships and perceptions of alternate life styles. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 129, 105–112. doi:10.1080/00221325.1976.10534016
  • *Strong, L. D. (1978). Alternative marital and family forms: Their relative attractiveness to college students and correlates of willingness to participate in nontraditional forms. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 493–503. doi:10.2307/350930
  • *Wise, G. W., & Strong, L. D. (1980). Self-actualization and willingness to participate in alternative marital and family forms. Adolescence, 15, 543–554.
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1–33. doi:10.1080/14792779943000116
  • Anderson, E. (2012). The monogamy gap: Men, love, and the reality of cheating. Oxford: University Press.
  • Arnett, J. J. (2015). The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood. Oxford: University Press.
  • Barash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (2009). Strange bedfellows: The surprising connection between sex, evolution and monogamy. New York, NY: Bellevue Literary Press.
  • Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (2010). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13, 748-772. doi:10.1177/1363460710384645
  • Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (2010). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13, 748-772. doi:10.1177/1363460710384645
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311–320. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
  • Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601
  • Blaney, A. D., & Colleen Sinclair, H. (2013). Defining concepts and new directions: a commentary on “the fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding nonnormative romantic relationships”. Assessing Stigma Surrounding Nonnormative Romantic Relationships”. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 38-41. doi: 10.1111/asap.12000
  • Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships I: A methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 183–216. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01555.x
  • Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181
  • Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 124–141. doi:10.1177/1088868312467087
  • de Visser, R., & McDonald, D. (2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual swinging couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 459–476. doi:10.1348/014466606X143153
  • Dickersin, K. (2002). Systematic reviews in epidemiology: Why are we so far behind? International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 6–12. doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.6
  • Drigotas, S., & Barta, W. (2001). The cheating heart: Scientific explorations of infidelity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 177–180. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00143
  • Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x
  • Finn, M. (2012). Monogamous order and the avoidance of chaotic excess. Psychology & Sexuality, 3, 123–136. doi:10.1080/19419899.2011.551834
  • Frank, K., & DeLamater, J. (2010). Deconstructing monogamy: Boundaries, identities, and fluidities across relationships. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding non- monogamies (pp. 9–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
  • Haupert, M., Gesselman, A., Moors, A., Fisher, H., & Garcia, J. (2016). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1–17. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. doi: 10.2307/352430
  • Luo, S., Cartun, M. A., & Snider, A. G. (2010). Assessing extradyadic behavior: A review, a new measure, and two new models. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.033
  • Lyons, H. A., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2014). Young adult casual sexual behavior: Life-course-specific motivations and consequences. Sociological Perspectives, 57, 79–101. doi:10.1177/0731121413517557
  • Lyons, H. A., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2015). Gender and casual sexual activity from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Social and life course correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 543–557. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.906032
  • McAnulty, R. D., & Brineman, J. M. (2007). Infidelity in dating relationships. Annual Review of Sex Research, 18, 94–114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848
  • *Matsick, J. L., Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., & Rubin, J. D. (2014). Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 339–348. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.832934
  • Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., Rubin, J. D., & Conley, T. D. (2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 52–69. doi:10.1111/asap.12020
  • Moors, A. C., Rubin, J. D., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). It’s not just a gay male thing: Sexual minority women and men are equally attracted to consensual non-monogamy. Journal Für Psychologie, 22, 1–13.
  • Negash, S., Cui, M., Fincham, F. D., & Pasley, K. (2014). Extradyadic involvement and relationship dissolution in heterosexual women university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 531–539. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0213-y
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Pfeffermann, D. (1996). The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5, 239–261. doi:10.1177/096228029600500303
  • Rubel, A. N., & Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Consensual nonmonogamy: Psychological well-being and relationship quality correlates. The Journal of Sex Research, 52, 961–982. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.942722
  • Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 27–39. doi: 10.1177/2167696812467330
  • *Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2016a). Testing the validity and factor structure of the willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy scale among college men and women. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s13178-016-0263
  • *Sizemore, K. M., & Olmstead, S. B. (2016b). Emerging adults’ willingness to engage in consensual non-monogamy: A structural equation analysis of sexual identity, casual sex attitudes, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1243200
  • Smith, J. R., & Smith, L. G. (1970). Co‐marital sex and the sexual freedom movement. The Journal of Sex Research, 6, 131–142. doi:10.1080/00224497009550656
  • Vail-Smith, K, Whetstone, L. M, & Knox, D. (2010). The illusion of safety in monogamous undergraduate relationships. American Journal Of Health Behavior, 34, 12-20.doi:. doi:10.5993/AJHB.34.1.2
  • Vrangalova, Z., & Ong, A. D. (2014). Who benefits from casual sex? The moderating role of sociosexuality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 883–891. doi: 10.1177/1948550614537308
  • Woik, E. (2015). Hook up culture: Changing the structure of future relationships? ( Master’s thesis). Minnesota State University. Retrieved from http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/433/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.