Attitudes and experiences of swinging couples

References

• Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 273–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumer, K., Bellew, W., Ito, B., Hatfield, E., & Heck, R. (2014). The happy green eyed monogamist: Role of jealousy and compersion in monogamous and non-traditional relationships. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 17. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume17/happy.html
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–63). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M. (2005). This is my partner and this is my…. partner’s partner. Constructing polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(1), 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Landridge, D. (2010). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13(6), 748–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartell, G. D. (1970). Group sex among the mid-Americans. Journal of Sex Research, 6, 113-130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartell, G. D. (1971). Group sex. New York, NY: Wyden.
   Google Scholar
• Bentzen, A., & Træen, B. (2013). Swinging in Norway in the context of sexual health. Sexuality & Culture, 18(1), 132–148.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2016). Tolerance in the United States: Does economic freedom transform racial, religious, political and sexual attitudes? European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, C., & Sinski, J. B. (2010). Swinging in America. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, C., & Williams, J. B. (2000). Today’s alternative marriage styles: The case of swingers. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 3. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume3/swing/body.htm
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1994). Individual differences in mating strategies. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 17, 581–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNN.com. (2014). CNN morality poll reveals surprising trends in America. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/09/cnn-poll-morality_n_4568789.html
   Google Scholar
• Cole, C. L., & Spaniard, G. B. (1974). Comarital mate-sharing and family stability. The Journal of Sex Research, 10, 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly non-monogamous individuals. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1559–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coon, R. (2006). Theorizing sex in heterodox society: Postmodernity, late capitalism and non-monogamous sexual behavior. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 9.
   Google Scholar
• de Visser, R., & McDonald, D. (2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual ‘swinging’ couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 459–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. M. (2004). Sexual identity, attractions, and behavior among young sexual-minority women over a 2-year period. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (2006). Understanding scores on the satisfaction with life scale. Retrieved from https://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/Documents/Understanding%20SWLS%20Scores.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. K. (1984). The commencement of bisexual activity in swinging married women over the age of thirty. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(1), 71–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, B. (1976). Swinging: In retrospect. The Journal of Sex Research, 12(3), 220–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, E. (2009). The swinging paradigm: An evaluation of the marital and sexual satisfaction of swingers. Dissertations Abstracts International, 70(5–B), 3221.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, M., & Malson, H. (2008). Speaking of home truth: (Re)productions of dyadic-containment in non-monogamous relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 519–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frayser, S. G. (1985). Varieties of sexual experience: An anthropological perspective on human sexuality. New Haven, CT: Human Relation Areas Files Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, B. G. (1975). That swinging couple down the block. Psychology Today, 8, 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, T. (1999). The lifestyle: A look at the erotic rites of swingers. Buffalo, NY: Firefly Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grunt-Mejer, K., & Campbell, C. (2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshel, A. M. (1973). Swinging: A study of decision making in marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 4, 885–891.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1992). Maintenance of open gay relationships: Some strategies for protection against HIV. AIDS Care, 4, 409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houngbedji, A., & Guillem, E. (2016). Profiles and sexual practices of current and past swingers interviewed on French websites. Sexologies, 25(1), e1–e4. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2015.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M., & Gallup, G. G. (2004). Sex differences in mating strategies: Mate guarding, infidelity, and multiple concurrent sex partners. Sexualities, Evolution, and Gender, 6(1), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. (1974). Sexual behavior in the 1970s. Chicago, IL: Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Hutzler, K. T., Giuliano, T. A., Herselman, J. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2016). Three’s a crowd: Public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(2), 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., & DeLamater, J. D. (2011). Understanding human sexuality (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, R. J. (1985). Swinging: A test of two theories and a proposed new model. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(6), 517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, R. J. (1992). Fear of AIDS among swingers. Annals of Sex Research, 5(4), 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, R. J. (1998). Swinging: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(5), 507–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Klesse, C. (2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niekamp, A., Mercken, L. A. G., Hoebe, C. J. P. A., & Dukers-Muijrers, N. H. T. M. (2013). A sexual affiliation network of swingers, heterosexuals practicing risk behaviours that potentiate the spread of sexually transmitted infections: A two-mode approach. Social Networks, 35(2), 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsick, J.L., Conley, T.D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A.C., & Rubin, J.D. (2014). Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(4), 339–348. doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.832934
   Google Scholar
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.
   Google Scholar
• Pavot, W. G., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152. doi:10.1080/17439760701756946
   Google Scholar
• Peplau, L. A., Fingerhut, A., & Beals, K. P. (2004). Sexuality in the relationships of lesbians and gay men. In J. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 349–369). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pines, A. (1992). Romantic jealousy: Five perspectives and an integrative approach. Psychotherapy, 29(4), 675–683.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). London, UK: Pandora.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. H. (2001). Alternative lifestyles revisited, or whatever happened to swingers, group marriages, and communes? Journal of Family Issues, 7(6), 711–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serina, A. T., Hall, M., Ciambrone, D., & Phua, V. C. (2013). Swinging around stigma: Gendered marketing of swingers’ websites. Sexuality & Culture, 17, 348–359.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpsteen, D, & Kirkpatrick, L. (1997). Romantic jealousy and adult romantic attachment. personality and Social Psychology, 23(3), 627-40.
   Google Scholar
• Sheff, E. (2006). Poly-hegemonic masculinities. Sexualities, 9(5), 621–642.
   Google Scholar
• Slatcher, R. B. (2010). When Harry and Sally met Dick and Jane: Creating closeness between couples. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivers, R. (1972). Paternal investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt, K. (2006). Reconstructing the meaning of fidelity: A qualitative inquiry into swinging relationships (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. M. (2010). Marriage and the family. In H. J. Birx (ed.), 21st century anthropology: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 162–173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walshok, M. L. (1971). The emergence of middle-class deviant subcultures: The case of swingers. Social Problems, 18, 488–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. (1983). Open marriage and multilateral relationships: The emergence of nonexclusive models of the marital relationship. In E. Macklin & R. Rubin (Eds.), Contemporary families and alternative lifestyles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• White, G., & Mullen, P. (1989). Jealousy: Theory, research, and clinical strategies. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar