2,833
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Global identification helps increase identity integration among Turkish gay men

Pages 329-342 | Received 03 Oct 2017, Accepted 28 Jun 2018, Published online: 16 Jul 2018

References

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.
  • Anderson, J., & Koc, Y. (2015). Exploring implicit and explicit antigay attitudes in Muslim and Atheist samples. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 687–701. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2126
  • Ariely, G. (2016). Global identification, xenophobia and globalisation: A cross-national exploration. International Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1002/ijop.12364
  • Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalisation. American Psychologist, 57(10), 774–783.
  • Bereket, T., & Adam, B. D. (2006). The emergence of gay identities in contemporary Turkey. Sexualities, 9, 131–151.
  • Berry, J. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 328–336.
  • Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Vol. Part 1, pp. 149–173). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Boratav, H. B., Fisek, G. O., & Ziya, H. E. (2014). Unpacking masculinities in the context of social change: Internal complexities of the identities of married men in Turkey. Men and Masculinities, 17, 299–324.
  • Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Copıng with threatened identities. London: Methuen.
  • Breakwell, G. M. (2014). Identity Process Theory: Clarifications and elaborations. In R. Jaspal & G. M. Breakwell (Eds), Identity Process Theory: Identity, social action and social change (pp. 20–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(10), 2809–2818.
  • Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
  • Dommelen, A., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Gonsalkorale, K., & Brewer, M. (2015). Construing multiple in-groups: Assessing social identity inclusiveness and structure in ethnic and religious minority group members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 386–399.
  • Erol, M., & Ozbay, C. (2013). I haven’t died yet: Navigating masculinity, aging and andropause in Turkey. In A. Kampf, B. Marshall, & A. Petersen (Eds.), Aging men: Masculinities and modern medicine (pp. 45–68). London: Routledge.
  • Eslen-Ziya, H., & Koc, Y. (2016). Being a gay man in Turkey: Internalised sexual prejudice as a function of prevalent hegemonic masculinity perceptions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18,(7), 799–811. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2015.1133846
  • Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Maintaining distinctions under threat: Heterosexual men endorse the biological theory of sexuality when equality is the norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 731–751.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
  • Gocmen, I., & Yilmaz, V. (2017). Exploring perceived discrimination among LGBT individuals in Turkey in education, employment, and health care: Results of an online survey. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 1052–1068.
  • Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 563–577.
  • Hornet. (2016). Hornet: The world’s premier gay social network. [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://love.hornetapp.com/
  • Huynh, Q.-L. (2009). Variations in biculturalism: Measurement, validity, mental and physical health/psycho-social correlates, and group differences of identity integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Riverside: University of California.
  • Iyer, A., Zhang, A., Jetten, J., Hao, Z., & Cui, L. (2017). The promise of a better group future: Cognitive alternatives increase students’ self-efficacy and academic performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 750–765. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12201
  • Jamal, A. (2001). The story of Lot and the Quran’s perception of the morality of same-sex sexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 41, 1–88.
  • Jaspal, R., & Cinnirella, M. (2012). Identity processes, threat, and interpersonal relations: Accounts from British Muslim gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(2), 215–240.
  • Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
  • Knowles, M. L., Lucas, G. M., Molden, D. C., Gardner, W. L., & Dean, K. K. (2010). There’s no substitute for belonging: Self-affirmation following social and nonsocial threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 173–186.
  • Koc, Y. (2016). Grindr as a participant recruitment tool for research with men who have sex with men. International Psychology Bulletin, 20, 27–31.
  • Koc, Y., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2012, July). Identity construction of gay men through masculinity perspectives in Turkey. Paper presented at the 30th International Congress of Psychology (ICP), Cape Town. South Africa. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.709142
  • Koc, Y., & Vignoles, V. (2016). Global identification predicts gay-male identity integration among gay men in Turkey. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 643–661.
  • Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165.
  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 151–173.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect:Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 39, 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
  • McFarland, S., Webb, M., & Brown, D. (2012). All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 830–853.
  • Metler, S. J., & Busseri, M. A. (2015). Further evaluation of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental studies. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12233
  • Mohr, J. J., & Fassinger, R. E. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 66–90.
  • Murray, S. O. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). MPLUS version 6 [computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén, & Muthén.
  • Nguyen, A. M. D., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2012). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122–159.
  • Ozbay, C. (2010). Nocturnal Queers: Rent Boys’ Masculinity in Istanbul. Sexualities, 13, 645–663.
  • Parker, R. (1999). Beneath the equator: Cultures of desire, male homosexuality, and emerging gay communities in Brazil. New York: Routledge.
  • Pleck, J. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617.
  • Reese, G., Proch, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2014). Individual differences in responses to global inequality. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14, 217–238.
  • Reese, G., Proch, J., & Finn, C. (2015). Identification with all humanity: The role of self-definition and self-investment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 426–440.
  • Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2013). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 858–870.
  • Rosenmann, A. (2016). Alignment with globalized Western culture: Between inclusionary values and an exclusionary social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 26–43.
  • Rosenmann, A., Reese, G., & Cameron, J. E. (2016). Social identities in a globalized world: Challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 202–221.
  • Sakalli, N. (2002). The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 53–64.
  • Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalisation: A critical introduction. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.
  • Simon, B. (2004). Identity in modern society: A social psychological perspective. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
  • Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
  • Tapınc, H. (1992). Masculinity, femininity and Turkish male homosexuality. In K. Plummer ( Rd.), Modern Homosexualities (pp. 39–49). London: Routledge.
  • Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288–307.
  • Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Identity motives. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_18
  • Vilaythong T., O., Lindner, N. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Do unto others”: Effects of priming the golden rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ attitudes toward gay people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(3), 494–506.
  • Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372.
  • Wilson, B. D. M., Harper, G. W., Hidalgo, M. A., Jamil, O. B., Torres, R. S., & Fernandez, M. I.; Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV-AIDS Interventions. (2010). Negotiating dominant masculinity ideology: Strategies used by gay, bisexual and questioning male adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(1–2), 169–185.
  • World Values Survey. (n.d.). World Values Survey: Fieldwork and Sampling. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.us/WVSContents.jsp