Traditional Gender Roles and Their Connections to Relational Uncertainty and Relational Satisfaction

References

• Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60, 58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylor, B., & Dainton, M. (2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance. Sex Roles, 50, 689–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, W. C., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1987). Relation of sex and gender role to love, sexual attitudes, and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 16, 637–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, W. C., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1987). Relation of sex and gender role to love, sexual attitudes, and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 16, 637–648. doi:10.1007/BF00300378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human. Communication Research, 12, 469–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Finan, A., & Kaminsky, A. (2008). Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model. Human Communication Research, 34, 600–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackless, M., Charuvastra, A., Derryck, A., Fausto-Sterling, A., Lauzanne, K., & Lee, E. (2000). How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 151–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new Source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long‐term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41, 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, D. A., Silver, D. H., Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., & Pearson, J. (1992). Working models of childhood attachment and couple relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 432–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (2001). Gender and relationships. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 256–272). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2016). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, J. A. (1994). Attachment style, communication patterns, and satisfaction across the life cycle of marriage. Personal Relationships, 1, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., Rogge, R., & Beach, S. R. H. (in press). Relationship satisfaction. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garnets, L., & Pleck, J. H. (1979). Sex role identity, androgyny, and sex role transcendence: A sex role strain analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 270–283. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianakos, I. (2002). Predictors of coping with work stress: The influences of sex, gender role, social desirability, and locus of control. Sex Roles, 46, 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 89–150). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L. A., & Rader, J. (2001). Current perspectives on women’s adult roles: Work, family, and life. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 156–170). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E. E. (2011). Relational uncertainty measure. In R. B. Rubin, A. M. Rubin, E. Graham, E. M. Perse, & D. Seibold (Eds.), Communication research measures II: A sourcebook (pp. 303–311). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J., & Barnow, Z. B. (2011). The reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing… or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, J. H, & Good, G. E. (2010). Positive psychology: an empirical examination of beneficial aspects of endorsement of masculine norms. Psychology Of Men & Masculinity, 11, 303–318. doi:10.1037/a0019056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5. pp. 151–178). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1995). Gender differences and similarities in sex and love. Personal Relationships, 2, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskin, R. A. (2017). Femme theory: Refocusing the intersectional lens. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 38, 95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston, T. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1986). When the honeymoon’s over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., & Jaffee, S. R. (2000). Becoming a heterosexual adult: The experiences of young women. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they make, and then break, our relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiselica, M. S., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2010). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male strengths: The positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 276–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, M. E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want women and men to be?. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 215–228). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K. (2007). Perceptions of turmoil within courtship: Associations with intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 363–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50, 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamke, L. K. (1989). Marital adjustment among rural couples: The role of expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 579–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamke, L. K., Sollie, D. L., Durbin, R. G., & Fitzpatrick, J. A. (1994). Masculinity, femininity and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 535–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., Braz, M. E., & Maloney, E. K. (2010). The down low, social stigma, and risky sexual behaviors: Insights from African-American men who have sex with men. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 610–633. doi:10.1080/00918361003712020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. S., Tufiş, P. A., & Alwin, D. F. (2017). The cultural divide and changing beliefs about gender in the United States, 1974–2010. Sex Roles, 77, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, A. E., & Zakahi, W. R. (2006). Perceptions of men and women departing from conversational sex-role stereotypes. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 281–298). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Magliozzi, D., Saperstein, A., & Westbrook, L. (2016). Scaling up representing gender diversity in survey research. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessin, L. (2018). Changing gender norms and marriage dynamics in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 25–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, J. S., & Solomon, D. H. (2015). Emotional support and physiological stress recovery: The role of support matching, adequacy, and invisibility. Communication Monographs, 82, 88–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlick, M. (2017). The perceived threat of sexual communication, number of previous sexual partners and topic avoidance in romantic relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 8, 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society, 25, 545–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 415–428). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. J., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Have changes in gender relations affected marital quality? Social Forces, 79, 731–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronen, S. (2010). Grinding on the dance floor: Gendered scripts and sexualized dancing at college parties. Gender & Society, 24, 355–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. (2017). “Stress that i don’t need”: Gender expectations and relationship struggles among the poor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 657–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, L. B. (1996). Fathering is a feminist issue. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 3–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (2016). Singleness and self-identity: The significance of partnership status in the narratives of never-married women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 385–400. doi:10.1177/0265407515611884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communications Monographs, 67, 306–323.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communications Monographs, 67, 306–323. doi:10.1080/03637750009376512
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. M., Aron, A., Carmichael, C. L., Reis, H. T., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). The costs of being put on a pedestal: Effects of feeling over-idealized. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 384–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, R. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L. (2011). Interpersonal processes in romantic relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 597–631). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L., & Daly, J. A. (1997). Gender differences in standards for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk, R., & Van Nobelen, D. (1993). Masculinity and femininity in the self with an intimate partner: Men are not always men in the company of women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 627–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986). Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1321–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. J., Ho, M. H. R., Wang, S. Y., & Miller, I. S. (2017). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64, 80–93. doi:10.1037/cou0000176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. J., Ho, M. R., Wang, S. Y., & Miller, I. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/cou0000176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (2000). Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2013). Biology or culture alone cannot account for human sex differences and similarities. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 241–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2004). Desirable and undesirable androgyny: A prescription for the twenty-first century. Journal of Gender Studies, 13, 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2004). Desirable and undesirable androgyny: A prescription for the twenty-first century. Journal of Gender Studies, 13, 15–28. doi:10.1080/09589236.2004.10599911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar