Why men don’t say no: sexual compliance and gender socialization in heterosexual men

References

• Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R., & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Tidwell, P. W. (1962). Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics, 4(4) , 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1962.10490038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. J., & Gladstone, N. (2012). Development of a short version of the Gender-Role Beliefs Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120205.05
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 133–139). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Women’s Foundation. (2015). Only 1 in 3 Canadians know what sexual consent means. Canadian Women’s Foundation. https://www.canadianwomen.org/about-us/media/1-3-canadians-know-sexual-consent-means/
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Women’s Foundation. (2018, May 16). Survey finds drop in Canadians’ understanding of consent. https://canadianwomen.org/survey-finds-drop-in-canadians-understanding-of-consent/
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19 (6), 829–859. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27640853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden, M. C., Ehman, A. C., Lair, E. C., & Gross, A. M. (2019). Sexual compliance: Examining the relationships among sexual want, sexual consent, and sexual assertiveness. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9551-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Aldine Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.1990.10559854
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensley, L. (2019, April 13). Why some people have sex even when they aren’t in the mood. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/5159949/maintenance-sex-not-in-the-mood
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Houts, L. A. (2005). But was it wanted? Young women’s first voluntary sexual intercourse. Journal of Family Issues, 26(8), 1082–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04273582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundhammer, T., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). How sex puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2015). (hetero)sexual compliance with unwanted casual sex: Associations with feelings about first sex and sexual self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 72(9), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0467-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2005). The gender of desire: Essays on male sexuality. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 561–587). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K. P., Pantalone, D. W., Lewis, M. A., & George, W. H. (2009). College students’ perceptions about alcohol and consensual sexual behavior: Alcohol leads to sex. Journal of Drug Education, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2190/DE.39.1.a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, R., Beckman, M., Chaurasiya, S. P., Subhedi, B., & Kerner, B. (2013). Whose turn to do the dishes? Transforming gender attitudes and behaviours among very young adolescents in Nepal. Gender & Development, 21(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2013.767520
   Google Scholar
• Lyvers, M., Cholakians, E., Puorro, M., & Sundram, S. (2011). Beer goggles: Blood alcohol concentration in relation to attractiveness ratings for unfamiliar opposite sex faces in naturalistic settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2006). Converging gender-roles. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 7(7), 5–17. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-001-x/10706/9268-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2011). Generational change in paid and unpaid work. Canadian Social Trends, 92, 13–24. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-008-x/2011002/article/11520-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, J., Tanner, A. E., & Heiman, J. R. (2010). The impact of gender expectations on meanings of sex and sexuality: Results from a cognitive interview study. Sex Roles, 62(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9723-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElrath, K. (2005). MDMA and sexual behavior: Ecstasy users’ perceptions about sexuality and sexual risk. Substance Use & Misuse, 40(9–10), 1461–1477. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-200066814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, E., Johnson, I., & Sigler, R. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions for women’s participation in unwanted sexual intercourse. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(5), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women’s token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rodgers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L. (1998). The importance and danger of studying sexually aggressive women. In P. Anderson & C. S. Johnson (Eds.), Sexually Aggressive Women (pp. 19–48). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C., Humphreys, T., Jozkowski, K., & Peterson, Z. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men’s gender role conflict using the gender role conflict scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 358–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008317057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A. (2018, May 2). Dating in the #MeToo era can mean more confusion over consent. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/4179985/dating-in-the-metoo-era-mean-more-confusion-over-consent/
   Google Scholar
• Patton, W., & Mannison, M. (1995). Sexual coercion in dating situations among university students: Preliminary Australian data. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539508257502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women’s consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15598519jsr4401_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn-Nilas, C., Goncalves, M. K., Kennett, D. J., & Grant, A. (2018). A thematic analysis of men’s sexual compliance with unwanted, non-coercive sex. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. T., Crocker, J., & Boike, K. R. (2005). Doing gender in the bedroom: Investing in gender norms and the sexual experience. Personality and Social Psychology, 31(10), 1445–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender-role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1992). Sexual precedence reduces the perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal: An examination of attributions concerning date rape and consensual sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotland, R. L., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Women’s ‘token resistant’ and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell Jr, W. E., Hawkins, R. C., & Belk S. S. (1988). Stereotypes about male sexuality and the use of social influence strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 42–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300005047_The_Stereotypes_About_Male_Sexuality_Scale_SAMSS_Components_correlates_antecedents_consequences_and_counselor_bias
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted sexual intercourse: College students’ dating experiences in three countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 31(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499409551739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, E., Cooper, D., & Greenbaum, B. (2015). The relationship between hegemonic norms of masculinity and men’s conceptualization of sexually coercive acts by women in South Africa. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(5), 796–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514536275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Hout, M. C., & Brennan, R. (2011). Feature: “Bump and grind”: An exploratory study of mephedrone users’ perceptions of sexuality and sexual risk. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 11(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/17459261111174046
   Google Scholar
• Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2010). Sex without desire: Characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults’ committed relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903132051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory: Past, present, and future. In DeLamater, John, & Plante, Rebecca F. (eds), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Woods, A. T., Velasco, C., Levitan, C. A., Wan, X., & Spence, C. (2015). Conducting perception research over the internet: A tutorial review. PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 3, e1058. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1058
   Google Scholar