Social Innovation, Individuals and Societies: An Empirical Investigation of Multi-layered Effects

References

• Alkire, S. 2005. “Subjective Quantitative Studies of Agency.” Social Indicators Research 74: 217–260.
   Google Scholar
• Alkire, S. 2008. “Concepts and Measures of Agency.” In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Volume I: Ethics, Welfare and Measurement, edited by K. Basu and R. Kanbur, 455–474. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alkire, S., R. Meinzen-Dick, A. Peterman, A. Quisumbing, G. Seymour, and A. Vaz. 2013. “The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index.” World Development 52: 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsop, R., M. F. Bertelsen, and J. Holland. 2006. Empowerment in Practice: From Analysis to Implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Altreconomia. 2015. Il libro dei GAS. Gruppi di acquisto solidali: come fare la spesa giusta, dalla “A” al KM Zero. Milano: Edizioni Altreconomia.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, K. 2013. “The Method of Randomization, Economic Policy, and Reasoned Intuition.” Policy Research Working Paper (December): 30. doi:10.1080/13600818.2014.961414
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2010. “How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets.” Organization Studies 31: 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezzi, C., and I. Baldini. 2006. Il brainstorming. Pratica e teoria. Milano: Franco Angeli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas-Diener, R., and E. Diener. 2006. “The Subjective Well-Being of the Homeless, and Lessons for Happiness.” Social Indicators Research 76: 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappero-Martinetti, E., and N. von Jacobi. 2015. How Can Sen's ‘CA’ Contribute to Understanding the Role for Social Innovations for the Marginalized? CrESSI Working Paper Series No. 3/2015. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappero-Martinetti, E., N. von Jacobi, L. Maestripieri, R. Ziegler, M. van der Linden, C. van Beers. 2016. Statistical Report. A deliverable of the project: “Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation (CrESSI).” European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Chirkov, V. I. 2009. “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Autonomy in Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.” Theory and Research in Education 7: 253–262.
   Google Scholar
• CrESSI Consortium. 2013. “Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation.” Grant Agreement 613261, Annex I.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. 2010. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning About Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 424–455. doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.424
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. 1971. “Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18: 105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, D. 2015. EU Public Policy, Social Innovation and Marginalisation: Reconciling Ambitions with Policy Instruments. CrESSI Working Papers No. 18/2015. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskala, R. 2015. Relating Mann's Conception. CrESSI Working Paper 9/2015. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskala, R. 2016. Forms of Power, European Empires and Globalizations. Michael Mann's The Sources of Social Power and Beyond. CrESSI Working Papers No. 28/2016. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S., and S. Alkire. 2007. “Agency and Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators.” Oxford Development Studies 35 (4): 379–403.
   Google Scholar
• IKT. 1986. Resolution der Interessengemeinschaft zur Erhaltung der kommunalen Trinkwasserversorgung (IKT): An das Bayrische Innenministerium, z.H. Staatsminister Dr. Hillermeier. Sebastian Schönauer.
   Google Scholar
• Maestripieri, L. 2017. “Does Social Innovation Reduce the Economic Marginalisation of Women? Insights from the Case of Solidarity Purchasing Groups.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 8 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Michael. 1993. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. 2012. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 3, Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi, M., and J. Southgate. 2013. “Banknotes, Local Currencies and Central Bank Objectives.” Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2013 (4): 317–325.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M., K. Himelein, and K. Beegle. 2013. Can Subjective Questions on Economic Welfare be Trusted? Evidence for Three Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper Series 6726. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M., and M. Lokshin. 2002. “Self-Rated Economic Welfare in Russia.” European Economic Review 46: 1453–1473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2008. The New Development Economics : We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn ? Dani Rodrik John F. Kennedy School of Government – Harvard University October 2008. Faculty Research Working Papers Series. (RWP08-055, October).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and N. Longhurst. 2013. “Growing Green Money? Mapping Community Currencies for Sustainable Development.” Ecological Economics 86: 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., A. Sen, and J.-P. Fitoussi. 2009. “Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.” http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaz, A., P. Pratley, and S. Alkire. 2015. Measuring Women's Autonomy in Chad and Its Associations with Breastfeeding Practices Using the Relative Autonomy Index. OPHI Research in Progress Series, 44a.
   Google Scholar
• von Jacobi, N., E. Chiappero-Martinetti, T. Giroletti, L. Maestripieri, and F. Ceravolo. 2015. Toolkit (Methodology). CrESSI Working Paper 16/2015. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• von Jacobi, N., D. Edmiston, and R. Ziegler. 2017. “Tackling Marginalisation Through Social Innovation? Examining the EU Social Innovation Policy Agenda from a Capabilities Perspective.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18 (2): 148–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, M. J., and C. van Beers. 2017. “Are Private (Digital) Moneys (Disruptive) Social Innovations? An Exploration of Different Designs.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 8 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. M., C. M. Sabiston, D. E. Mack, and C.M. Blanchard. 2012. “On the Nature and Function of Scoring Protocols Used in Exercise Motivation Research: An Empirical Study of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire.” Psychology of Sport & Exercise 13: 614–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. 2017. “Citizen Innovation as Niche Restoration - A Type of Social Innovation and Its Relevance for Political Participation and Sustainability.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 8 (2).
   Google Scholar