The Contemporary Relevance of Karl Polanyi to Critical Social Enterprise Scholarship

References

• Adorno, T. W., and M. Horkheimer. 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Verso Edition Published in 1997. London: Verso Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, S. K. 2007. “Social Enterprise Typology.” Virtue Ventures LLC. Available at: https://www.globalcube.net/clients/philippson/content/medias/download/SE_typology.pdf (Accessed 30 April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., ed. 2009. The Social Economy: International Perspectives on Economic Solidarity. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., A. Cameron, and R. Hudson. 2003. “The Alterity of the Social Economy.” In Alternative Economic Spaces, edited by A. Leyshon, R. Lee, and C. C. Williams, 27–54. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., and M. Lee. 2014. “Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises.” The Academy of Management Annals 8(1):397–441. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.893615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., M. Sengul, A.-C. Pache, and J. Model. 2015. “Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises.” Academy of Management Journal 58(6):1658–1685. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, G. 1996. Karl Polanyi on Ethics and Economics. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, G. 2009. “The Social Economy: An Alternative Model of Economic Development.” Journal of Catholic Social Thought 6(1):253–262. doi:10.5840/jcathsoc20096113.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2009. “The Social Order of Markets.” Theory and Society 38(3):245–269. doi:10.1007/s11186-008-9082-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2010. “How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets.” Organization Studies 31(5):605–627. doi:10.1177/0170840610372184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2011. “The Great Transformation of Embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology.” In Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, edited by C. Hann and K. Hart, 38–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., and W. K. Smith. 2014. “Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 39(3):364–381. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, F. L. 2003. “Karl Polanyi and the Writing of the Great Transformation.” Theory and Society 32(3):275–306. doi:10.1023/A:1024420102334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, F. L., and M. R. Somers. 1984. “Beyond the Economistic Fallacy: The Holistic Social Science of Karl Polanyi.” In Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, edited by T. Skocpol, 47–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, F. L., and M. R. Somers. 2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi’s Critique. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and P. M. Karré. 2011. “Hybrid Organizations: No Cause for Concern?” International Journal of Public Administration 34(13):827–836. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.605090.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, L., and S. Zamagni. 2007. Civil Economy: Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness. Frontiers of Business Ethics. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, M. 2008. “Challenging Tensions: Critical, Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives on Social Enterprise.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 14(5):268–275. doi:10.1108/13552550810897641.
   Google Scholar
• Castellas, E. I., W. Stubbs, and V. Ambrosini. 2018. “Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3809-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, C. 2016. “Tip of the Iceberg: The Nonprofit Underpinnings of for-Profit Social Enterprise.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 45(2):217–237. doi:10.1177/0899764015572901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. 1976. “Adam Smith’s View of Man.” The Journal of Law and Economics 19(3):529–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. 2014. “Understanding and Combating Mission Drift in Social Enterprises.” Social Enterprise Journal 10(1):3–20. doi:10.1108/SEJ-09-2013-0036.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2013. Making Capitalism Fit for Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, T. 2008. “Finding That Grit Makes a Pearl: A Critical Re-Reading of Research into Social Enterprise.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 14(5):276–290. doi:10.1108/13552550810897650.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G. 2016. Reconstructing Karl Polanyi. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, R. 2004a. “Being “Business-Like” in a Nonprofit Organization: A Grounded and Inductive Typology.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(2):290–310. doi:10.1177/0899764004263522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart, R. 2004b. “The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(4):411–424. doi:10.1002/nml.43.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G., and B. B. Anderson. 2006. “Framing a Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Building on Two Schools of Practice and Thought.” In Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field, edited by R. Mosher-Williams, ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3), 39–66. Indianapolis, IN: Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA)
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G., and J. Elias. 1998. “Review: The Challenges of Combining Social and Commercial Enterprise.” Business Ethics Quarterly 8(1):165–178. doi:10.2307/3857527.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G. 1998. “The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Duke University – Fuqua School of Business.” Available at: https://csistg.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/csi.gsb.stanford.edu/files/TheMeaningofsocialEntrepreneurship.pdf (Accessed 4 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff, eds. 2014. Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., and M. Nyssens. 2010. “Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(1):32–53. doi:10.1080/19420670903442053.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., and M. Nyssens. 2006. “Defining Social Enterprise.” In Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society, edited by M. Nyssens, 3–26. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P., and C. Mason. 2018. “Overcoming Constraints of Collective Imagination: An Inquiry into Activist Entrepreneuring, Disruptive Truth-Telling and the Creation of ‘Possible Worlds.” Journal of Business Venturing 33(1):84–99. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, P., and C. Steyaert. 2012. “Social Entrepreneurship: Critique and the Radical Enactment of the Social.” Social Enterprise Journal 8(2):90–107. doi:10.1108/17508611211252828.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, P., and S. Teasdale. 2016. “The Tactical Mimicry of Social Enterprise Strategies: Acting ‘as If’ in the Everyday Life of Third Sector Organizations.” Organization 23(4):485–504. doi:10.1177/1350508415570689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., H. Haugh, and F. Lyon. 2014. “Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews 16(4):417–436. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drayton, W. 2011. Everyone a Changemaker – Social Entrepeneurship’s Ultimate Goal. In Creating a New Civilization through Social Entrepreneurship, edited by P. U. Petit, 53–62. Piscataway, NJ: First Transaction Publishers/Goi Peace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dufays, F., and B. Huybrechts. 2014. “Connecting the Dots for Social Value: A Review on Social Networks and Social Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 5(2):214–237. doi:10.1080/19420676.2014.918052.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry, A. M., and J. D. Kluver. 2004. “The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk?” Public Administration Review 64(2):132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer, E. C., and U. Stephan. 2016. “Bringing the State Back in: How Hybrid Organizations Navigate Plurality in Institutional Environments.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2016(1):12289. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2016.12289abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2013. “A Triple Movement?: Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi.” New Left Review 81:119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2014. “Can Society Be Commodities All the Way down? Post-Polanyian Reflections on Capitalist Crisis.” Economy and Society 43(4):541–558. doi:10.1080/03085147.2014.898822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardin, L. 2014. Solidarity Based Initiatives: Field Realities and Analysis. In Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective, edited by J. Defourny, L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff, 114–129. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, J. 2015. “Welfare Rights, Self-Help and Social Enterprise: Unpicking Neoliberalism’s Mess.” Journal of Sociology 53(1):47–62. doi:10.1177/1440783315607388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. 2018. “Rethinking the Double Movement: Expanding the Frontiers of Polanyian Analysis in the Global South.” Development and Change 49(5):1268–1290. doi:10.1111/dech.12419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3):481–510. doi:10.1086/228311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S., and R. Swedberg, eds. 2001. The Sociology of Economic Life. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. 2006. “Community (Not-for-Profit) Governance – What Are Some of the Issues?” Third Sector Review 12(1):39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. 2007. “Learning through ‘Being’ and ‘Doing.” Action Research 5(3):265–274. doi:10.1177/1476750307081017.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. 2014. Social Enterprise Through a Critical Appreciative Lens. In Social Enterprise: Accountability and Evaluation around the World, edited by S. Denny and F. Seddon, 213–231. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugh, H. 2005. “A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship.” Social Enterprise Journal 1(1):1–12. doi:10.1108/17508610580000703.
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh, C. 2016. “The Survival of Non-Capitalism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(5):877–894. doi:10.1177/0263775816639313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2013. “Public Entrepreneurship: Desiring Social Change, Creating Sociality.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25(1–2):34–51. doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.746883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockerts, K. 2015. “How Hybrid Organizations Turn Antagonistic Assets into Complementarities.” California Management Review 57(3):83–106. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2017. “Karl Polanyi on Economy and Society: A Critical Analysis of Core Concepts.” Review of Social Economy 75(1):1–25. doi:10.1080/00346764.2016.1171385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, T. K. 1957. Sociology and the Substantive View of the Economy. In Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, edited by K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, and H. W. Pearson, 270–306. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/63.2.376.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. 1975. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, M., and S. Grant. 2005. “Social Enterprise and Re-Civilization of Human Endeavors: Re-Socializing the Market Metaphor or Encroaching Colonization of the Lifeworld?” Current Issues in Comparative Education 8(1):41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, B., and H. Haugh. 2018. “The Roles of Networks in Institutionalizing New Hybrid Organizational Forms: Insights from the European Renewable Energy Cooperative Network.” Organization Studies 39(8):1085–1108. doi:10.1177/0170840617717097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, S. L., and A. Anderson. 2002. “The Effects of Embeddedness on the Entrepreneurial Process.” Journal of Business Venturing 17(5):467–487. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A., M. J. Roy, and C. Donaldson. 2016. “Re-Imagining Social Enterprise.” Social Enterprise Journal 12(2):217–234. doi:10.1108/SEJ-05-2016-0018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlin, J. A. 2013. “Defining Social Enterprise across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42(1):84–108. doi:10.1177/0899764011433040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlin, J. A., ed. 2009. Social Enterprise: A Global Comparison. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Krippner, G. R. 2002. “The Elusive Market: Embeddedness and the Paradigm of Economic Sociology.” Theory and Society 30(6):775–810. doi:10.1023/A:1013330324198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippner, G. R., and A. S. Alvarez. 2007. “Embeddedness and the Intellectual Projects of Economic Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 33(1):219–240. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippner, G. R., M. Granovetter, F. L. Block., et al. 2004. “Polanyi Symposium: A Conversation on Embeddedness.” Socio-Economic Review 2(1):109–135. doi:10.1093/soceco/2.1.109.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, J.-L. 2014. “The Social and Solidarity Economy: A Theoretical and Plural Framework.” In Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective, edited by J. Defourny, L. Hulgård, and V. Pestoff, 102–113. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, J.-L., and M. Nyssens. 2006. “Public Policies and WISEs in Europe.” In Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society, edited by M. Nyssens, 272–295. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laville, J.-L., and M. Nyssens. 2001. “The Social Enterprise: Towards a Theoretical Socio-Economic Approach.” In The Emergence of Social Enterprise, edited by C. Borzaga and J. Defourny, 312–332. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, C. 1994. “How Karl Polanyi’s Moral Economy Can Help Religious and Other Social Critics.” In Humanity, Society and Commitment: On Karl Polanyi. Critical Perspectives on Historic Issues, edited by K. McRobbie, 143–161. Montréal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, N. M. C. 2011. “Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology: Notes on the Concept of (Dis)embeddedness.” RCCS Annual Review. A Selection from the Portuguese Journal Revista Crítica De Ciências Sociais (3). Available at: http://rccsar.revues.org/309 (Accessed 29 March 2019). doi:10.4000/rccsar.309.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., J. Mayer, and E. Lutz. 2015. “Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations.” Organization Studies 36(6):713–739. doi:10.1177/0170840615580007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendell, M. 2009. “Three Pillars of the Social Economy.” In The Social Economy: International Perspectives on Economic Solidarity, edited by A. Amin, 176–207. London; New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2018. “Populists Are on the Rise but This Can Be a Moment for Progressives Too.” The Guardian, 10 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/10/populists-rise-progressives-radical-right (Accessed 18 October 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and S. Teasdale. 2017. “Neoliberalism by Stealth? Exploring Continuity and Change within the UK Social Enterprise Policy Paradigm.” Policy & Politics 45(3):323–341. doi:10.1332/030557316X14775864546490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and R. Young. 2008. “Preface.” In Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, edited by Nicholls A. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and R. Ziegler. 2017. “An Extended Social Grid Model for the Study of Marginalization Processes and Social Innovation.” CRESSI Working Paper 2/2015 (revised 4/2017). Available at: http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/5947/1/CRESSI_Working_Paper_2_2017rev_Chp2_April17.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nyssens, M., ed. 2006. Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56(4):972–1001. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, C., and C. Howorth. 2008. “The Language of Social Entrepreneurs.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20(3):285–309. doi:10.1080/08985620701800507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peattie, K., and A. Morley. 2008. “Eight Paradoxes of the Social Enterprise Research Agenda.” Social Enterprise Journal 4(2):91–107. doi:10.1108/17508610810901995.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2012. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peredo, A. M. 2012. “The Difference Culture Makes: The Competitive Advantage of Reciprocal, Non-Monetary Exchange.” In Businesses with a Difference: Balancing the Social and the Economic, edited by J. Quarter, L. Mook, and S. Ryan, 87–110. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Second Beacon Paperback Edition Published in 2001. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process.” In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, and H. W. Pearson, 243–269. Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1971. Primitive, Archaic, and Modern Economies: Essays of Karl Polanyi, edited by G. Dalton. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi Levitt, K. 2013. From the Great Transformation to the Great Financialization: On Karl Polanyi and Other Essays. London; New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley-Duff, R., and M. Bull. 2011. Understanding Social Enterprise: Theory & Practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley-Duff, R., and M. Bull. 2015. Understanding Social Enterprise: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M. J., and M. T. Hackett. 2017. “Polanyi’s ‘Substantive Approach’ to the Economy in Action? Conceptualising Social Enterprise as a Public Health ‘Intervention.” Review of Social Economy 75(2):89–111. doi:10.1080/00346764.2016.1171383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruebottom, T. 2018. “Deliberative Democracy in Social Entrepreneurship: A Discourse Ethics Approach to Participative Processes of Social Change.” In Social Entrepreneurship: An Affirmative Critique, edited by P. Dey and C. Steyaert, 191–209. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F. 2015. The Return of Ordinary Capitalism: Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy. Oxford; New York: OUP USA.
   Google Scholar
• Seelos, C., J. Mair, J. Battilana, et al. 2011. “The Embeddedness of Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding Variation Across Local Communities.” In Communities and Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, and R. Greenwood, 333–363. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Sepulveda, L. 2015. “Social Enterprise – A New Phenomenon in the Field of Economic and Social Welfare?” Social Policy & Administration 49(7):842–861. doi:10.1111/spol.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikheldin, G. H., and J. F. Devlin. 2015. “Community Development as Double Movement.” International Journal of Community Development 3(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. J., and R. Swedberg. 2005. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. The Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics. Available at: https://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/The%20Wealth%20of%20Nations.pdf (Accessed 12 May 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2002. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R. 2018. “Utopianism and the Reality of Society: Decoding Polanyi’s Socialism, Freedom and The Alchemy of Misrecognition.” In Karl Polanyi’s Vision of a Socialist Transformation, edited by M. Brie and C. Thomasberger, 91–109. Montréal: Black Rose Books.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R., and F. Block. 2014. “The Return of Karl Polanyi.” Dissent Magazine, Spring. Available at: http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/the-return-of-karl-polanyi (Accessed 25 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C., and P. Dey. 2010. “Nine Verbs to Keep the Social Entrepreneurship Research Agenda ‘Dangerous.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(2):231–254. doi:10.1080/19420676.2010.511817.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 2009. “Moving beyond Market Fundamentalism to a More Balanced Economy.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 80(3):345–360. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00389.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 2001. Foreword. In: The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Second Beacon Paperback Edition Published in 2001, vii–xviii. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2003. Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S. 2012a. “Guest Editorial.” Social Enterprise Journal 8(2):88–89. doi:10.1108/sej.2012.37308baa.001.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S. 2012b. “Negotiating Tensions: How Do Social Enterprises in the Homelessness Field Balance Social and Commercial Considerations?.” Housing Studies 27(4):514–532. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.677015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S. 2012c. “What’s in a Name? Making Sense of Social Enterprise Discourses.” Public Policy and Administration 27(2):99–119. doi:10.1177/0952076711401466.
   Google Scholar
• Tedmanson, D., K. Verduyn, C. Essers, and W. B. Gartner. 2012. “Critical Perspectives in Entrepreneurship Research.” Organization 19(5):531–541. doi:10.1177/1350508412458495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., N. Phillips, and O. Jarvis. 2011. “Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model.” Organization Science 22(1):60–80. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utting, P., ed. 2015. Social and Solidarity Economy: Beyond the Fringe? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yunus, M. 2010. Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism That Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar