Is Programme Evaluation the Same as Social Impact Measurement?

References

• Bamberger, M., J. Rugh, and L. Mabry. 2011. RealWorld Evaluation: Working under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Basheka, B. C., and A. Byamugisha. 2015. “The State of Monitoring and Evaluation (MandE) as a Discipline in Africa.” African Journal of Public Affairs 8 (3): 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• Besharati, N. A. 2014. “Platinum and Passes The Impact of Mining Investments on Education Outcomes in South Africa.”
   Google Scholar
• Besharati, N., and K. Tsotsotso. 2015. In Search of the Education Panacea: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Improve Learner Achievement in South Africa. Unpublished Research Report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Bless, B. D., K. Tsotsotso, and E. K. Gebremichael. 2017. “Evaluation Capacity Assessment of the Transport Sector in South Africa: An innovative Approach.” African Evaluation Journal 5 (1): 1–8. doi:10.4102/aej.v5i1.188.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, J., T. Archibald, M. Hargraves, and W.M. Trochim. 2015. “Defining and Teaching Evaluative Thinking: Insights from Research on Critical Thinking.” American Journal of Evaluation 36 (3): 375–388. doi:10.1177/1098214015581706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. 1991. “Methods for the Experimenting Society.” Evaluation Practice 12 (3): 223–260. doi:10.1016/0886-1633(91)90039-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, D. J. 1993. “Knowledge Required to Perform the Duties of an Evaluator.” The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 8 (1): 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T. 1990. Theory-Driven Evaluations. Newbury, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• CLEAR-AA. 2017. African Evaluation Database. Accessed October 22 2019. https://crest2.sun.ac.za/african_evaluation_db/default/african_eval_db_01
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. L. 1966. Program Evaluation and Review Technique: Applications in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, J. 2004. Six Normative Approaches to Evaluation. Cremorne.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1985. The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Estrella, M., and J. Gaventa. 1998. Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelman, J., and K. Huntington. 2017. Impact Investing: History and Opportunity. Accessed October 22 2019. https://athenacapital.com/wp-content/uploads/Impact-Investing-History-and-Opportunity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., J. Young, and C. Barnett. 2015. Impact Investments: A Literature Review. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN). 2009. New Industry Group Launched to Facilitate For – Profit Investing that Addresses Social and Environmental Challenges. Accessed October 22 2019. https://thegiin.org/assets/GIIN%20Launch%202009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Griñó, L., C. Levine, S. Porter, and G. Roberts. 2014. Embracing Evaluative Thinking for Better Outcomes: Four NGO Case Studies. InterAction and the Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results for Anglophone Africa (CLEAR-AA). Accessed October 22 2019. http://www.interaction.org/document/embracing-evaluative-thinking-better-outcomes-four-ngo-case-studies.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton-Smith, N., and M. Hopkins. 1998. “Theory-Driven Interviewing: From Theory into Practice.” Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 60 (1): 80–105. doi:10.1177/075910639806000103.
   Google Scholar
• House, E. R. 1991. “Realism in Research.” Educational Researcher 20 (6): 2–9. doi:10.3102/0013189X020006002.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T. 2013. “Interrogating the Theory of Change: Evaluating Impact Investing Where it Matters Most.” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 3 (2): 95–110. doi:10.1080/20430795.2013.776257.
   Google Scholar
• Loveridge, D. 2016. Results Measurement in Impact Investing: A Preliminary Review. http://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwjn2JWP0b_lAhUNilwKHUHkD6oQFjABegQIChAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.enterprise-development.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FDCED-RM-in-Impact-Investing-Review.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0dql0sIFdcpxJI_TksJ81i
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. 2010. “Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11 (2): 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. L., M. A. Scheirer, W. R. Shadish, and C. Wye. 1995. “Guiding Principles for Evaluators.” New Directions for Program Evaluation 1995 (66): 19–26. doi:10.1002/ev.1706.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. 2010. “Investigating Argumentation in Reading Groups: Combining Manual Qualitative Coding and Automated Corpus Analysis Tools.” Applied Linguistics 32 (2): 172–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, P., and C. Barnett. 2017. Evaluation and Impact Investing: A Review of Methodologies to Assess Social Impact (No. IDS Evidence Report; 222). IDS.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. M. 2004. “Evaluation Forms: Toward an Inclusive Framework for Evaluation Practice.” In Evaluation roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences, 356–370.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1997. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. “A Vision of Evaluation that Strengthens Democracy.” Evaluation 8 (1): 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2014. Evaluation Flash Cards: Embedding Evaluative Thinking in Organizational Culture. St. Paul, Minnesota: Otto Bremer Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. “An Introduction to Scientific Realist Evaluation.” In Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, edited by E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish, 405–418. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P., H. Freeman, and M. Lipsey. 2004. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. 1974. “Pros and Cons About Goal-Free Evaluation.” In Evaluation in Education edited by W. J. Popham, 34–67. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. 1998. “Minimalist Theory of Evaluation: The Least Theory that Practice Requires.” American Journal of Evaluation 19 (1): 57–70. doi:10.1177/109821409801900105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. 1994. “Evaluation as a Discipline.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 20 (1): 147–166. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(00)80010-3.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Jr, and R. Epstein. 1987. “Patterns of Program Evaluation Practice among Members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network.” Evaluation Review 11 (5): 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. 1994. Unfinished liberalism. Social Research 61 (3), 631–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1967. “The countenance of educational evaluation. Department for Exceptional Children, Gifted Children Section.” Teacher’s College Record, 68: 523–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, S. M. 1970. “Program Evaluation: A Broader Definition.” Journal of Extension 8 (2): 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelstad, B. 2016. “Impact Investing: A Brief History.” Capitalism and Society 11 (2): Article 4.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, R. T. II, 2012. “Qualitative Research Sample Design and Sample Size: Resolving and Unresolved Issues and Inferential Imperatives.” Preventive Medicine 55 (5): 398–400. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. 1967. Changing Concepts of Educational Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrichsen, T. C. 2015. Assessing the Economic Impacts of the Higher Education Innovation Fund: A mixed-Method Quantitative Assessment. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, Y. 1991. Evaluation on the Run. Melbourne: ARIA.
   Google Scholar
• Worthen, B. R., J. R. Sanders, and J. L. Fitzpatrick. 1997. Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. 2nd ed. New York: White Plains.
   Google Scholar