Expert knowledge and social innovation: analysing policy debates in Japan

References

• Adam, D., and M. Hess. 2010. “Social Innovation and Why It Has Policy Significance.” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 21 (2): 139–155. doi:10.1177/103530461002100209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoo, K. 2018. “An Analysis of the Social Innovation Scaling Processes in Selected Asian Countries.” PhD thesis, University of Tsukuba.
   Google Scholar
• Aoo, K., N. Abe, and M. R. Kano. 2019. “To Be Supported, or Not to Be: Images of Older People in Policy and the Reality in Local Communities in Japan.” Frontiers in Sociology 4: 16. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benneworth, P., and J. Cunha. 2015. “Universities’ Contributions to Social Innovation: Reflections in Theory & Practice.” European Journal of Innovation Management 18 (4): 508–527. doi:10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelman, V., and C. Heales. 2015. “Social Innovation Strategies – Regional Report. Project SI-DRIVE – Social Innovation: Driving Force of Social Change.” https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/D3.6-SI-DRIVE-Global-Region-Report-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., and R. Bodini. 2014. “What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework for Policy Development.” Social Policy and Society 13 (3): 411–421. doi:10.1017/S1474746414000116.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bragaglia, F. 2021. “Social Innovation as a ‘Magic Concept’ for Policy-Makers and Its Implications for Urban Governance.” Planning Theory 20 (2): 102–120. doi:10.1177/1473095220934832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield, A. T., and C. G. Reddick. 2016. “Smart City Implementation Through Shared Vision of Social Innovation for Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of Kitakyushu, Japan.” Social Science Computer Review 34 (6): 757–773. doi:10.1177/0894439315611085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2021. “Expert Knowledge and Policymaking: A Multi-Disciplinary Research Agenda.” Policy & Politics 49 (3): 455–471. doi:10.1332/030557320X15898190680037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., C. Simms, and P. Trott. 2022. “Collaborative Public Sector Innovation: An Analysis of Italy, Japan, and Turkey.” Governance (in Press): 1-22. doi:10.1111/gove.12673.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, M., and M. L. Wallace. 2017. “Shaken, But Not Stirred’: Sixty Years of Defining Social Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119: 64–79. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, K., and S. Wasserman. 1992. “Blockmodels: Interpretation and Evaluation.” Social Networks 14 (1–2): 5–61. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(92)90013-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., and P. Leifeld. 2019. “The Polycentricity of Climate Policy Blockage.” Climatic Change 155 (4): 469–487. doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02481-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., J. Waggle, and P. Leifeld. 2013. “Where Does Political Polarization Come from? Locating Polarization Within the U.S. climate Change Debate.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1): 70–92. doi:10.1177/0002764212463360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., P. Leifeld, and Y. Iwaki. 2013. “Mapping the Ideological Networks of American Climate Politics.” Climatic Change 116 (3–4): 523–545. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0512-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougère, M., B. Segercrantz, and H. Seeck. 2017. “A Critical Reading of the European Union’s Social Innovation Policy Discourse: (Re)Legitimizing Neoliberalism.” Organization 24 (6): 819–843. doi:10.1177/1350508416685171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujisawa, Y., Y. Ishida, S. Nagatomi, and K. Iwasaki. 2015. “A Study of Social Innovation Concepts: A Japanese Perspective.” Japan Social Innovation Journal 5 (1): 1–13. doi:10.12668/jsij.5.1.
   Google Scholar
• Galego, D., F. Moulaert, M. Brans, and G. Santinha. 2022. “Social Innovation & Governance: A Scoping Review.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 35 (2): 265–290. doi:10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, G. 1992. “Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 3 (4): 469–500. doi:10.1177/0957926592003004003.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. 2018. “Committee Hearings of the UK Parliament: Who Gives Evidence and Does This Matter?” Parliamentary Affairs 71 (2): 283–304. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerston, L. N. 2014. Public Policy Making: Process and Principles. 3rd ed. New York: M.E. Sharpe/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ghinoi, S., and B. Steiner. 2020. “The Political Debate on Climate Change in Italy: A Discourse Network Analysis.” Politics and Governance 8 (2): 215–228. doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B., and D. Vinck. 2017. Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grilo, R., and A. C. Moreira. 2022. “The Social as the Heart of Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: An Emerging Area or an Old Crossroads?” International Journal of Innovation Studies 6 (2): 53–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2022.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2007. “Climate Change and Knowledge Politics.” Environmental Politics 16 (3): 414–432. doi:10.1080/09644010701251656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., and R. Kopp. 2012. “Shaping Social Innovation by Social Research.” In Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society, edited by H. W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, and J. Howaldt, 43–55. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• IDB. 2016. Study of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation Ecosystems in South East and East Asian Countries: Country Analysis: Japan/The Japan Research Institute. IDB Technical Note, 1211. Washington, D.C. United States: IDB. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/study-social-entrepreneurship-and-innovation-ecosystems-south-east-and-east-asian-5
   Google Scholar
• Japan Finance Corporation 2014. ソーシャルビジネスの経営実態 ∼「社会的問題と事業との関わりに関するアンケート」から. https://www.jfc.go.jp/n/findings/pdf/sme_findings141118.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. 2015. “Social Innovation: Redesigning the Welfare Diamond.” In New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, edited by A. Nicholls, J. Simon, and M. Gabriel, 89–106. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., F. Moulaert, L. Hulgard, A. Hamdouch, F. Moulaert, and D. MacCallum. 2013. “Social Innovation Research: A New Stage in Innovation Analysis?” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by A. Mehmood and A. Hamdouch, 110–130. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kaneko, I. 2013. “Social Entrepreneurship in Japan: A Historical Perspective on Current Trends.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 4 (3): 256–276. doi:10.1080/19420676.2013.799085.
   Google Scholar
• Kenens, J., M. Van Oudheusden, G. Yoshizawa, and I. Van Hoyweghen. 2020. “Science by, With and for Citizens: rethinking ‘Citizen Science’ After the 2011 Fukushima Disaster.” Palgrave Communications 6 (1): 58. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0434-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlin, J. 2009. Social Enterprise: A Global Comparison. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauz, A. 2016. “Transition Management in Montreuil: Towards Perspectives of Hybridisation Between ‘Top-Down’ and ‘Bottom-Up’ Transitions.” In Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions: European and Asian Experiences, edited by D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, and S. Mizuguchi, 133–150. Tokyo: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kweon, Y., and K. Suzuki. 2022. “How Partisan Politics Influence Government Policies in Response to Ageing Populations.” Policy & Politics 50 (2): 261–281. doi:10.1332/030557321X16316356206483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. 2017. “Discourse Network Analysis: Policy Debates as Dynamic Networks.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, edited by J. N. Victor, A. H. Montgomery, and M. N. Lubbell, 301–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. 2020. “Policy Debates and Discourse Network Analysis: A Research Agenda.” Politics and Governance 8 (2): 180–183. doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.3249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., and S. Haunss. 2012. “Political Discourse Networks and the Conflict over Software Patents in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (3): 382–409. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitheiser, S., and A. Follmann. 2020. “The Social Innovation–(Re)Politicisation Nexus: Unlocking the Political in Actually Existing Smart City Campaigns? The Case of SmartCity Cologne, Germany.” Urban Studies 57 (4): 894–915. doi:10.1177/0042098019869820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liff, A. P., and K. Maeda. 2019. “Electoral Incentives, Policy Compromise, and Coalition Durability: Japan’s LDP–Komeito Government in a Mixed Electoral System.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 20 (1): 53–73. doi:10.1017/S1468109918000415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macke, J., J. A. R. Sarate, J. Domeneghini, and K. A. D. Silva. 2018. “Where Do We Go from Now? Research Framework for Social Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Cleaner Production 183: 677–685. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkamäki, A., T. Ylä-Anttila, M. Brockhaus, A. Toppinen, and P. M. Wagner. 2021. “Unity in Diversity? When Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Beliefs Grow Trees in South Africa.” Land Use Policy 102: 105283. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, P., K. Morgan, and R. Richardson. 2018. “Social Innovation in Question: The Theoretical and Practical Implications of a Contested Concept.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (3): 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama, Y., M. Nishikido, and T. Iida. 2007. “The Rise of Community Wind Power in Japan: Enhanced Acceptance Through Social Innovation.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2761–2769. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A., and K. Johnston-Miller. 2016. “Governance: public Governance to Social Innovation?” Policy & Politics 44 (4): 663–675. doi:10.1332/030557314X14042230109592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Membretti, A. 2007. “Centro Sociale Leoncavallo: Building Citizenship as an Innovative Service.” European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (3): 252–263. doi:10.1177/0969776407077742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• METI 2008. ソーシャルビジネス研究会 報 告 書. https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/local_economy/sbcb/sbkenkyukai/sbkenkyukaihoukokusho.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milley, P., B. Szijarto, K. Svensson, and J. B. Cousins. 2018. “The Evaluation of Social Innovation: A Review and Integration of the Current Empirical Knowledge Base.” Evaluation 24 (2): 237–258. doi:10.1177/1356389018763242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, T. 2016. “Are Social Innovation Paradigms Incommensurable?” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (4): 1979–2000. doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9688-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M.-L., F. R. Westley, O. Tjornbo, and C. Holroyd. 2012. “The Loop, the Lens, and the Lesson: Using Resilience Theory to Examine Public Policy and Social Innovation.” In Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets, edited by A. Nicholls and A. Murdock, 89–113. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum, and J. Hillier. 2013. “Social Innovation: Intuition, Precept, Concept, Theory and Practice.” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 13–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2006. “The Process of Social Innovation.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1 (2): 145–162. doi:10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. 2020. “The Financial Statistics of Social Security in Japan. Fiscal Year 2018.” https://www.ipss.go.jp/ss-cost/e/fsss-18/data/cost2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ndou, V., and G. Schiuma. 2020. “The Role of Social Innovation for a Knowledge-Based Local Development: Insights from the Literature Review.” International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 11 (1): 6–25. doi:10.1504/IJKBD.2020.106841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ney, S. 2014. “The Governance of Social Innovation: Connecting Meso and Macro Levels of Analysis.” In The Science of Stories, edited by M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, and M. K. McBeth, 207–234. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and A. Murdock. 2012. “The Nature of Social Innovation.” In Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets, edited by A. Nicholls and A. Murdock, 1–30. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and D. Edmiston. 2018. “Social Innovation Policy in the European Union.” In Policy Design in the European Union: An Empire of Shopkeepers in the Making?, edited by R. Heiskala and J. Aro, 161–190. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nordberg, K., Å. Mariussen, and S. Virkkala. 2020. “Community-Driven Social Innovation and Quadruple Helix Coordination in Rural Development. Case Study on LEADER Group Aktion Österbotten.” Journal of Rural Studies 79: 157–168. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normile, D. 2007. “Science Policy: Japan Picks up the ‘Innovation’ Mantra.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 316 (5822): 186. doi:10.1126/science.316.5822.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notarnicola, E., S. Berloto, and E. Perobelli. 2020. “Social Innovation in Social Care Services: actors and Roles in the Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 24 (2):182–207. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1805918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onitsuka, K. 2019. “How Social Media Can Foster Social Innovation in Disadvantaged Rural Communities.” Sustainability 11 (9): 2697. doi:10.3390/su11092697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautz, H. 2018. “Think Tanks, Tories and the Austerity Discourse Coalition.” Policy and Society 37 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1397395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B., and R. Kemp. 2020. “Between Innovation and Restoration; Towards a Critical-Historicizing Understanding of Social Innovation Niches.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (10): 1182–1194. doi:10.1080/09537325.2020.1750588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., H. Lee, A. Ghobadian, N. O’Regan, and P. James. 2015. “Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review.” Group & Organization Management 40 (3): 428–461. doi:10.1177/1059601114560063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, E., and S. Ville. 2009. “Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (6): 878–885. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. 1995. “The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process.” Journal of European Public Policy 2 (2): 159–183. doi:10.1080/13501769508406981.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2-3): 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., B. Persson, and P. Garpenby. 2019. “The Dilemma of Knowledge Use in Political Decision-Making: National Guidelines in a Swedish Priority-Setting Context.” Health Economics, Policy and Law 14 (4): 425–442. doi:10.1017/S1744133118000233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Świtek, B. 2014. “Representing the Alternative: Demographic Change, Migrant Eldercare Workers, and National Imagination in Japan.” Contemporary Japan 26 (2): 263–280. doi:10.1515/cj-2014-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Tanimoto, K. 2008. “A Conceptual Framework of Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation Cluster: A Preliminary Study.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management 42: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Tanimoto, K. 2012. “The Emergent Process of Social Innovation: Multi-Stakeholders Perspective.” International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 4 (3/4): 267–280. doi:10.1504/IJIRD.2012.047561.
   Google Scholar
• The Hope Institute. 2017. “Social Innovation in Asia: Trends and Characteristics in China, Korea, India, Japan and Thailand.” In New Worlds from Below: Informal Life Politics and Grassroots Action in Twenty-First-Century Northeast Asia, edited by T. Morris-Suzuki and E. Jeong Soh, 249–274. Acton: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Have, R. P., and L. Rubalcaba. 2016. “Social Innovation Research: An Emerging Area of Innovation Studies?” Research Policy 45 (9): 1923–1935. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. 1979. “The Many Meanings of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 39 (5): 426–431. doi:10.2307/3109916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, F. 2013. “The History of Social Innovation.” Keynote speech at NESTA Social Frontiers Conference, November 14, London. https://www.nesta.org.uk/event/social-frontiers/
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2007. “Interpretation in Policy Analysis: On Methods and Practice.” Critical Policy Studies 1 (1): 110–122. doi:10.1080/19460171.2007.9518511.
   Google Scholar
• Yonezawa, A. 2018. “Japan: World-Class Universities for Social Innovation. Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You….” International Higher Education 96: 21–23. doi:10.6017/ihe.2019.96.10779.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. D., and L. A. Swanson. 2014. “Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 5 (2): 175–191. doi:10.1080/19420676.2014.880503.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. 2017. “Social Innovation as a Collaborative Concept.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (4): 388–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar