Senomic view of the cell: Senome versus Genome

References

• Richmond ML. Thomas Henry Huxley’s developmental view of the cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;3:61–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp J. Affective neurosciences. The foundation of human and animal emotions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dort CJ, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R. Neurochemical modulators of sleep and anesthetic states. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;46:75–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mashour GA, Alkire MT. Evolution of consciousness: phylogeny, ontogeny, and emergence from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(Suppl2):10357–10364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Searle J. Theory of mind and Darwin’s legacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(Suppl2):10343–10348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curwen C. Music-colour synaesthesia: concept, context and qualia. Conscious Cogn. 2018;61:94–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfman ZZ, Ginsburg S, Jablonka E. The transition to minimal consciousness through the evolution of associative learning. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1954.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Plant neurobiology: from sensory biology, via plant communication, to social plant behavior. Cogn Process. 2009;10(Suppl 1):S3–S7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant SGN. A general basis for cognition in the evolution of synapse signaling complexes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;74:249.
   Google Scholar
• Trewavas AJ, Baluška F. The ubiquity of consciousness. The ubiquity of consciousness, cognition and intelligence in life. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:1221–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perouansky M. The quest for a unified model of anesthetic action: a century in Claude Bernard’s shadow. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:465–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grémiaux A, Yokawa K, Mancuso S, et al. Plant anesthesia supports similarities between animals and plants: Claude Bernard’s forgotten studies. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9:e27886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi A. Reawakening anaesthesia research. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:1113–1118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyon P. The cognitive cell: bacterial behavior reconsidered. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baluška F, Yokawa K, Mancuso S, et al. Understanding of anesthesia - why consciousness is essential for life and not based on genes. Commun Integr Biol. 2016;9:e1238118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallverdú J, Castro O, Mayne R, et al. Slime mould: the fundamental mechanisms of biological cognition. Biosystems. 2018;165:57–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokawa K, Kagenishi T, Pavlovic A, et al. Anaesthetics stop diverse plant organ movements, affect endocytic vesicle recycling and ROS homeostasis, and block action potentials in Venus flytraps. Ann Bot. 2018. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Kováč L. Fundamental principles of cognitive biology. Evol Cogn. 2000;6:51.
   Google Scholar
• Kováč L. Life, chemistry and cognition. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kováč L. Information and knowledge in biology - time for reappraisal. Plant Signal Behav. 2007;2:65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kováč L. Bioenergetics - a key to brain and mind. Commun Integr Biol. 2008;1:114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenspan R. An introduction to nervous systems. New York (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Keijzer FA. Evolutionary convergence and biologically embodied cognition. Inter Foc. 2017;7:20160123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson JA. REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:803–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koseska A, Bastiaens PI. Cell signaling as a cognitive process. EMBO J. 2017;36:568–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro J. Bacteria are small but not stupid: cognition, natural genetic engineering and socio-bacteriology. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci Part C. 2997;38:807–819.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro JA. Mobile DNA and evolution in the 21st century. Mobile DNA. 2010;1:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro JA. Evolution. A view from the 21st century. Saddle River, NJ: FT Press Science; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro JA. Living organisms author their read-write genomes in evolution. Biology (Basel). 2017;6:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Deep evolutionary origins of neurobiology: turning the essence of ‘neural’ upside-down. Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2:62–65.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WB. Cognition, information fields and hologenomic entanglement: evolution in light and shadow. Biology (Basel). 2016;5:21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ford BJ. On intelligence in cells: the case for whole cell biology. Interdiscip Sci Rev. 2009;34:350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford BJ. Cellular intelligence: microphenomenology and the realities of being. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2017;131:273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WB. Biological information systems: evolution as cognition-based information management. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2018;134:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Levin M. On having no head: cognition throughout biological systems. Front Psychol. 2016;7:902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock J, Levit M. Signal transduction: hair brains in bacterial chemotaxis. Curr Biol. 2000;10:R11–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler EW. Sensory principles of higher plants. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:392–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner ED, Stahlberg R, Mancuso S, et al. Plant neurobiology: an integrated view of plant signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D, et al. The ‘root-brain’ hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin: revival after more than 125 years. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4:1121–1127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Root apex transition zone as oscillatory zone. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Volkmann D, Menzel D. Plant synapses: actin-based domains for cell-to-cell communication. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:106–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlicht M, Strnad M, Scanlon MJ, et al. Auxin immunolocalization implicates vesicular neurotransmitter-like mode of polar auxin transport in root apices. Plant Signal Behav. 2006;1:122–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F. Cell-cell channels, viruses, and evolution: via infection, parasitism, and symbiosis toward higher levels of biological complexity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1178:106–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Microorganism and filamentous fungi drive evolution of plant synapses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettbach U, Strnad M, Mancuso S, et al. Immunogold-EM analysis reveal Brefeldin A-sensitive clusters of auxin in Arabidopsis root apex cells. Commun Integr Biol. 2017;10:e1327105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Synaptic view of eukaryotic cell. Int J Gen Syst. 2014;43:740–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosik KN. Exploring the early origins of the synapse by comparative genomics. Biol Lett. 2009;5:108–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F. Rethinking origins of multicellularity: convergent evolution of epithelia in plants. Bioessays. 2012;34:1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnati LF, Baluška F, Barlow PW, et al. Mosaic, self-similarity logic, and biological attraction principles: three explanatory instruments in biology. Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2:552–563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torday JS, Miller WB. A systems approach to physiologic evolution: from micelles to consciousness. ‎J Cell Physiol. 2017;1:162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WB, Torday JS. A systematic approach to cancer: evolution beyond selection. Clin Transl Med. 2017;6:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marijuán PC, Navarro J, del Moral R. How the living is in the world: an inquiry into the informational choreographies of life. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015;31:469–480.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert SF, Sapp J, Tauber AI. A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Q Rev Biol. 2012;87:325–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose AM. Replicating and cycling stores of information perpetuate life. BioEssays. 2018;40:e1700161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintilhac PM. Toward a theory of cellularity – speculations on the nature of the living cell. BioScience. 1999;49:59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein W. Physics in mind: a quantum view of the brain. New York: Basic Books; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kato T. Epigenomics in psychiatry. Neuropsychobiology. 2009;60:2–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad HP, Baylin SB. Linking cell signaling and the epigenetic machinery. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1033–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos DA, Chan U, Chen LF, et al. Chromatin regulation of neuronal maturation and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2018;41:311–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasca F, Bodega B, Orlando V. How polycomb-mediated cell memory deals with a changing environment: variations in PcG complexes and proteins assortment convey plasticity to epigenetic regulation as a response to environment. BioEssays. 2018;40:e1700137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho L, Crabtree GR. Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature. 2010;463:474–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature. 2010;463:485–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scita G, Di Fiore PP. The endocytic matrix. Nature. 2010;463:464–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrelli E, Nestler EJ, Allis CD, et al. Decoding the epigenetic language of neuronal plasticity. Neuron. 2008;60:961–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patalano S, Hore TA, Reik W, et al. Shifting behaviour: epigenetic reprogramming in eusocial insects. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24:367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper K. All life is problem solving. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann H-J. Karl Popper and the two new secrets of life. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Witzany G. Life is more than a computer running DNA software. World J Biol Chem. 2014;5:275–278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witzany G. The biocommunication method: on the road to an integrative biology. Commun Integr Biol. 2016;9:e1164374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Loof A. From Darwin’s on the origin of species by means of natural selection to the evolution of life with communication activity as its very essence and driving force (= mega-evolution). Life Excit Biol. 2015;3:153–189.
   Google Scholar
• De Loof A. The Evolution of” Life”: a metadarwinian integrative approach. Commun Integr Biol. 2017;3:e1301335.
   Google Scholar
• Hellingwerf KJ. Bacterial observations: a rudimentary form of intelligence? Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duijn M, Keijzer F, Franken D. Principles of minimal cognition: casting cognition as sensorimotor coordination. Adapt Behav. 2006;14:157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda T. An intelligent slime mold: a self-organizing system of cell shape and information. Lect Notes Complex Syst. 2005;3:221–253.
   Google Scholar
• Ball P. Cellular memory hints at the origins of intelligence. Nature. 2008;451:385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussutour A, Latty T, Beekman M, et al. Amoeboid organism solves complex nutritional challenges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:4607–4611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo Garzón F, Keijzer F. Cognition in plants. In: Baluška F, ed. Plant-environment interactions from behavioural perspective. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer Verlag; 2009. p. 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Aspects of plant intelligence. Ann Bot. 2003;92:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Plant intelligence. Naturwissenschaften. 2005;92:401–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas A. Intelligence, cognition, and language of green plants. Front Psychol. 2016;7:588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Sahi VP, Trewavas A. Are plants sentient? Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40:2858–2869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mian IS, Rose C. Communication theory and multicellular biology. Integr Biol. 2011;3:350–367.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson GL. The Fluid-Mosaic model of membrane structure: still relevant to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of biological membranes after more than 40 years. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1838:1451–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goñi FM. The basic structure and dynamics of cell membranes: an update of the Singer-Nicolson model. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1838:1467–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser H-J, Lingwood D, Levental I, et al. Order of lipid phases in model and plasma membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:16645–16650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sych T, Mély Y, Römer W. Lipid self-assembly and lectin-induced reorganization of the plasma membrane. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373:1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honigmann A, Pralle A. Compartmentalization of the cell membrane. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:4739–4748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapf D. Compartmentalization of the plasma membrane. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;53:15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadegh S, Higgins JL, Mannion PC, et al. The plasma membrane is compartmentalized by a self-similar cortical actin meshwork. Phys Rev X. 2017;7:011031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane N, Martin WF. The origin of membrane bioenergetics. Cell. 2012;151:1406–1416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deamer D. The role of lipid membranes in life’s origin. Life. 2017;7:5.
   Google Scholar
• Lane N. Proton gradients and the origin of life. BioEssays. 2017;39:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira D, López-García P. Ten reasons to exclude viruses from the tree of life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:306–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claverie J-M. Viruses take center stage in cellular evolution. Genome Biol. 2006;7:110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde NR, Maddur MS, Kaveri SV, et al. Reasons to include viruses in the tree of life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forterre P. Defining life: the virus viewpoint. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2010;40:151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Saenz J, Rodas JD. Viruses, virophages, and their living nature. Acta Virol. 2010;54:85–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annila A, Baverstock K. Genes without prominence: a reappraisal of the foundations of biology. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11:20131017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WB Jr, Torday JS. Four domains: the fundamental unicell and post-Darwinian cognition-based evolution. Progr Biophys Mol Biol. 2018. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson C, Kleinbaum AM, Wheatley T. Similar neural responses predict friendship. Nat Commun. 2018;9:332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar RIM. The anatomy of friendship. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018;22:32–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp J, Panksepp JB. Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:489–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peil KT. Emotion: the self-regulatory sense. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014;3:80–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackmore S. Memes and the evolution of religion: we need memetics, too. Behav Brain Sci. 2016;39:e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaden G, Patin C. Semiotic systems with duality of patterning and the issue of cultural replicators. Hist Philos Life Sci. 2017;40:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier J, Besnard J, Allain P. Theory of mind, empathy and emotion perception in cortical and subcortical neurodegenerative diseases. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2018;174:237–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann MK, Lockwood PL, Rushworth MFS. Neural mechanisms of social cognition in primates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2018;41. In press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westby CE. Social neuroscience and theory of mind. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2014;66:7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Olson IR. The original social network: white matter and social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018;22:504–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kováč L. Science, an essential part of culture. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:128–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kováč L. Finitics - a plea for biological realism. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:703–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laland K, Odling-Smee J, Myles S. How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagel M. Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:405–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek FA. The sensory order. An inquiry into the foundations of the theoretical psychology. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorre M. On time, causation and the sense of agency. J Consc Stud. 2017;3-4:203–215.
   Google Scholar
• Olivotto M, Arcangeli A, Carlà M, et al. Electric fields at the plasma membrane level: a neglected element in the mechanisms of cell signalling. BioEssays. 1996;18:495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veech RL, Kashiwaya Y, Gates DN, et al. The energetics of ion distribution: the origin of the resting electric potential of cells. IUBMB Life. 2002;54:241–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott BH. Electric fields in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 1967;18:409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Weisenseel MH, Nuccitelli R, Jaffe LF. Large electrical currents traverse growing pollen tubes. J Cell Biol. 1975;66:556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisenseel MH, Dorn A, Jaffe LF. Natural H+ currents traverse growing roots and root hairs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiol. 1979;64:512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwabuchi A, Yano M, Shimizu H. Development of extracellular electric pattern around Lepidium roots: its possible role in root growth and gravitropism. Protoplasma. 1989;148:94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AL, Gow NA. Correlation between root-generated ionic currents, pH, fusicoccin, indoleacetic acid, and growth of the primary root of Zea mays. Plant Physiol. 1989;89:1198–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collings DA, White RG, Overall RL. Ionic current changes associated with the gravity-induced bending response in roots of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. 1992;100:1417–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Wan Y-L. Physical control over endocytosis. In: Šamaj J, ed. Endocytosis in plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2012. p. 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Ion channels in plants: from bioelectricity, via signaling, to behavioral actions. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8:e23009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou S-A, Uesaka M. Bioelectrodynamics in living organisms. Int J Engin Sc. 2006;44:67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M. Endogenous bioelectrical networks store non-genetic patterning information during development and regeneration. J Physiol. 2014;592:2295–2305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M, Pezzulo G, Finkelstein JM. Endogenous bioelectric signaling networks: exploiting voltage gradients for cntrol of growth and form. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:353–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng A, Levin M. Cracking the bioelectric code: probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation. Commun Integr Biol. 2013;6:e22595.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin M, Martyniuk CJ. The bioelectric code: an ancient computational medium for dynamic control of growth and form. Biosystems. 2018;164:76–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich F, McCormick DA. Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron. 2010;67:129–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastassiou CA, Perin R, Markram H, et al. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:217–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastassiou CA, Koch C. Ephaptic coupling to endogenous electric field activity: why bother? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;31:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldwyn JH1, Rinzel J. Neuronal coupling by endogenous electric fields: cable theory and applications to coincidence detector neurons in the auditory brain stem. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115:2033–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Banaclocha M. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons: possible contribution of astroglial magnetic fields? Neuroscience. 2018;370:37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez PL, Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG. Second ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Buzsáki G, Anastassiou CA, Koch C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents -EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:407–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fels D. The double-aspect of life. Biol. 2018;7:28.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen H. Magnetoreception in birds and its use for long-distance migration. In: Sturkie’s avian physiology. Sixth ed. 2015. Associated Press; p. 113–133. DOI::10.1007/978-3-642-10,769-6_20.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltschko R, Thalau P, Gehring D, et al. Magnetoreception in birds: the effect of radio-frequency fields. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12:103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltschko R, Ahmad M, Nießner C, et al. Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: the crucial step occurs in the dark. J R Soc Interface. 2015;13:2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzon-Rodriguez A, Muheim R. Zebra finches have a light-dependent magnetic compass similar to migratory birds. J Exp Biol. 2017;220:1202–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther A, Einwich A, Sjulstok E, et al. Double-cone localization and seasonal expression pattern suggest a role in magnetoreception for European robin cryptochrome 4. Curr Biol. 2018;28:211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catania KC. Electric eels concentrate their electric field to induce involuntary fatigue instruggling prey. Curr Biol. 2015;25:2889–2898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke D, Whitney H, Sutton G, et al. Detection and learning of floral electric fields by bumblebees. Science. 2013;340:66–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke D, Morley E, Robert D. The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017;203:737–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohan M, Parow A, Stoll AL, et al. Low-field magnetic stimulation in bipolar depression using an MRI-based stimulator. Am J Psych. 2004;161:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohan ML, Yamamoto RT, Ravichandran CT, et al. Rapid mood-elevating effects of low field magnetic stimulation in depression. Biol Psych. 2014;76:186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields C, Levin M. Multiscale memory and bioelectric error correction in the cytoplasm-cytoskeleton-membrane system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2018;10:e1410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar