1,876
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mini-Review

The jamming avoidance response in echolocating bats

ORCID Icon &
Pages 10-13 | Received 22 Dec 2018, Accepted 09 Jan 2019, Published online: 31 Jan 2019

References

  • von der Emde G, Schwarz S, Gomez L, et al. Electric fish measure distance in the dark. Nature. 1998;395:890–894.
  • von der Emde G. Active electrolocation of objects in weakly electric fish. J Exp Biol. 1999;202:1205–1215.
  • Hagedorn M, Heiligenberg W. Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish. Anim Behav. 1985;33:254–265.
  • Bullock TH, Hamstra RH, Scheich H. The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol. 1972;77:1–22.
  • Heiligenberg W. Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish Eigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei). J Comp Physiol. 1973;87:137–164.
  • Jones G, Sripathi K, Waters DA, et al. Individual variation in the echolocation calls of three sympatric Indian Hipposideridae bats, and an experimental attempt to jam bat echolocation. Folia Zool. 1994;43:347–362.
  • Fawcett K, Jacobs DS, Surlykke A, et al. Echolocation in the bat, Rhinolophus capensis: the influence of clutter, conspecifics and prey on call design and intensity. Biol Open. 2015;4:693–701.
  • Schmidt U, Joermann G. The influence of acoustical interferences on echolocation in bats. Mammalia. 1986;50:3.
  • Masters WM, Raver KAS, Kazial KA. Sonar signals of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, contain information about individual identity, age and family affiliation. Anim Behav. 1995;50:1243–1260.
  • Pearl DL, Fenton MB. Can echolocation calls provide information about group identity in the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)? Can J Zool. 1996;74:2184–2192.
  • Kazial KA, Burnett SC, Masters WM. Individual and group variation in echolocation calls of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. J Mammal. 2001;82:339–351.
  • Fenton MB, Jacobs DS, Richardson EJ, et al. Individual signatures in the frequency-modulated sweep calls of African large-eared, free-tailed bats Otomops martiensseni (Chiroptera: Molossidae). J Zool. 2004;262:11–19.
  • Siemers BM, Schnitzler H-U. Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species. Nature. 2004;429:657–661.
  • Yovel Y, Melcon ML, Franz MO, et al. The voice of bats: how greater mouse-eared bats recognize individuals based on their echolocation calls. PLoS Comp Biol. 2009;5:e1000400.
  • Ulanovsky N, Fenton MB, Tsoar A, et al. Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 2004;271:1467–1475.
  • Bates ME, Stamper SA, Simmons JA. Jamming avoidance response of big brown bats in target detection. J Exp Biol. 2008;211:106–113.
  • Gillam EH, Montero BK. Influence of call structure on the jamming avoidance response of echolocating bats. J Mammal. 2016;97:14–22.
  • Takahashi E, Hyomoto K, Riquimaroux H, et al. Adaptive changes in echolocation sounds by Pipistrellus abramus in response to artificial jamming sounds. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:2885–2891.
  • Jarvis J, Bohn KM, Tressler J, et al. A mechanism for antiphonal echolocation by free-tailed bats. Anim Behav. 2010;79:787–796.
  • Jarvis J, Jackson W, Smotherman M. Groups of bats improve sonar efficiency through mutual suppression of pulse emissions. Front Physiol. 2013;4:140.
  • Ibáñez C, Juste J, López-Wilchis R, et al. Habitat variation and jamming avoidance in echolocation calls of the sac-winged bat (Balantiopteryx plicata). J Mammal. 2004;85:38–42.
  • Ratcliffe JM, Ter Hofstede HM, Avila-Flores R, et al. Conspecifics influence call design in the Brazilian free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis. Can J Zool. 2004;82:966–971.
  • Bartonička T, Řehák Z, Gaisler J. Can pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber, 1774) and Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Leach, 1825), foraging in a group, change parameters of their signals? J Zool. 2007;272:194–201.
  • Necknig V, Zahn A. Between-species jamming avoidance in Pipistrelles? J Comp Physiol A. 2011;197:469–473.
  • Corcoran AJ, Conner WE. Bats jamming bats: food competition through sonar interference. Science. 2014;346:745–747.
  • Amichai E, Blumrosen G, Yovel Y. Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282:2064.
  • Cvikel N, Levin E, Hurme E, et al. On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282:1798.
  • Hage SR, Jiang T, Berquist SW, et al. Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4063–4068.
  • Luo J, Goerlitz HR, Brumm H, et al. Linking the sender to the receiver: vocal adjustments by bats to maintain signal detection in noise. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18556.
  • Luo J, Kothari NB, Moss CF. Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:6605–6610.
  • Chiu C, Xian W, Moss CF. Flying in silence: echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:13116–13121.
  • Götze S, Koblitz JC, Denzinger A, et al. No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30978.
  • Moss CF, Surlykke A. Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:2207.
  • Chiu C, Xian W, Moss CF. Adaptive echolocation behavior in bats for the analysis of auditory scenes. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:1392–1404.
  • Feng AS, Simmons JA, Kick SA. Echo detection and target-ranging neurons in the auditory system of the bat Eptesicus fuscus. Science. 1978;202:645–648.
  • O’Neill WE, Suga N. Target range-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. Science. 1979;293:69–73.
  • Roverud RC, Grinnell AD. Echolocation sound features processed to provide distance information in the CF/FM bat, Noctilio albiventris: evidence for a gated time window utilizing both CF and FM components. J Comp Physiol A. 1985;156:457–469.
  • Schnitzler H-U, Grinnell AD. Directional sensitivity of echolocation in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum: I. Directionality of sound emission. J Comp Physiol A. 1977;116:51–61.
  • Jones TK, Wohlgemuth MJ, Conner WE. Active acoustic interference elicits echolocation changes in heterospecific bats. J Exp Biol. 2018;221. DOI:10.1242/jeb.176511
  • Miller LA. Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol A. 1991;168:571–579.
  • Tougaard J, Casseday JH, Covey E. Arctiid moths and bat echolocation: broad-band clicks interfere with neural responses to auditory stimuli in the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus of the big brown bat. J Comp Physiol A. 1998;182:203–215.
  • Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Conner WE. Tiger moth jams bat sonar. Science. 2009;325:325–327.
  • Corcoran AJ, Conner WE. Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense. J Exp Biol. 2012;215:4278–4287.