Exposure to 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field modulates ROS in human HEK293 cells as a function of signal amplitude

References

• Marko SM. 2015. Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis group; doi:10.1201/b18148
   Google Scholar
• Batool S, Bibi A, Frezza F, et al. Benefits and hazards of electromagnetic waves, telecommunication, physical and biomedical: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Apr;23(7):3121–3128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev IY. Dependence of non-thermal biological effects of microwaves on physical and biological variables: implications for reproducibility and safety standards. European J Oncology - Library. 2010;5:187–218.
   Google Scholar
• Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health. 2016;31(3):363–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, et al. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: an international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018 Nov;242(Pt A):643–658.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houston BJ, Nixon B, King BV, et al. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. Reproduction. 2016 Dec;152(6):R263–R276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi WJ, Wang LF, Hu XJ. Recent advances in the effects of microwave radiation on brains. Military Med Res. 2017;4(1):29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altun G, Ög D, Yurt KK, et al. Effects of mobile phone exposure on metabolomics in the male and female reproductive systems. Environ Res. 2018Nov;167:700–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9218486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakymenko I, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, et al. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):186–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou CD. Non-thermal effects and mechanisms of interaction between electromagnetic fields and living matter. In: Giuliani L, and Soffritti M, editors. European Journal of Oncology -Library An ICEMS Monograph. Vol. 5. Bologna, Italy: Ramazzini Institute; 2010. p. 63–113.
   Google Scholar
• Durdik M, Kosik P, Markova E, et al. Microwaves from mobile phone induce reactive oxygen species but not DNA damage, preleukemic fusion genes and apoptosis in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 7;9(1):16182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imlay JA. Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77(1):755–776.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auten RL, Davis JM. Oxygen toxicity and reactive oxygen species: the devil is in the details. Pediatr Res. 2009 Aug;66(2):121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Meo S, Reed TT, Venditti P, et al. Harmful and Beneficial Role of ROS. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:7909186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falone S, Marchesi N, Osera C, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) prevents pro-oxidant effects of H2O2 in SK-N-BE(2) human neuroblastoma cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2016 May;92(5):281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markov MS. Expanding use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapies. Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(3):257–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhang X. Magnetic Fields and Reactive Oxygen Species. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Oct 18;18(10):2175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H. Exposure to Static and Extremely-Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and Cellular Free Radicals. Electromagn Biol Med. 2019;38(4):231–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooam M, Jourdan N, El Esawi M, et al. HEK293 cell response to static magnetic fields via the radical pair mechanism may explain therapeutic effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrard RM, Morellini N, Jourdan N, et al. Low-intensity electromagnetic fields induce human cryptochrome to modulate intracellular reactive oxygen species. PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 2;16(10):e2006229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnert S, Fentz A-K, Schreiner A, et al. Extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields cause antioxidative defense mechanisms in human osteoblasts via induction of •O2 − and H2O2. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14544 |.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuermann D, Mevissen M. Manmade Electromagnetic Fields and Oxidative Stress— biological Effects and Consequences for Health. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard K, Krause K-H. The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: physiology and Pathophysiology. KAREN BEDARD AND KARL. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(1):245–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanovic AM, Pavicic I, Trosic I. Cell oxidation-reduction imbalance after modulated radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015;34(4):381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, et al. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 31;4(7):e6446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Kraus S, Hauptman Y, et al. Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochem J. 2007 Aug 1;405(3):559–568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burlaka A, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, et al. Overproduction of free radical species in embryonal cells exposed to low intensity radiofrequency radiation. Exp Oncol. 2013 Sep;35(3):219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu YS, Huang BT, Huang YX. Reactive oxygen species formation and apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell induced by 900 MHz mobile phone radiation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012;2012:740280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmyślony M, Politanski P, Rajkowska E, et al. Acute exposure to 930 MHz CW electromagnetic radiation in vitro affects reactive oxygen species level in rat lymphocytes treated by iron ions. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 Jul;25(5):324–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vian A, Davies E, Gendraud M, et al. Plant Responses to High Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:13. Article ID 1830262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agathokleous E, Calabrese EJ. Hormesis: the dose response for the 21st century: the future has arrived. Toxicology. 2019 Sep 1;425:152249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. Hormesis: a fundamental concept in biology. Microb Cell. 2014 Apr 23;1(5):145–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vargas-Hernandez M, Macias-Bobadilla I, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, et al. Plant Hormesis Management with Biostimulants of Biotic Origin in Agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 13;8:1762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Salus M, Bektas Y, Schroeder M, et al. The Synthetic Elicitor 2-(5-Bromo-2-Hydroxy-Phenyl)-Thiazolidine-4-Carboxylic Acid Links Plant Immunity to Hormesis. Plant Physiol. 2016 Jan;170(1):444–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paponov I, Fliegmann J, Narayana R, et al. Differential root and shoot magnetoresponses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 9195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaqami M, Hammad M, Pooam M, et al. Arabidopsis cryptochrome is responsive to Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammad M, Albaqami M, Pooam M, et al. Cryptochrome mediated magnetic sensitivity in Arabidopsis occurs independently of light-induced electron transfer to the flavin. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020 Mar 1;19(3):341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hore PJ, Mouritsen H. The Radical-Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception. Annu Rev Biophys. 2016 Jul 5;45(1):299–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar