A general theory of consciousness II: The language problem

References

• Peper A. A general theory of consciousness I: consciousness and adaptation. Commun Integr Biol. 2020;13(1):6–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivanova AA, Mineroff Z, Zimmerer V, et al. The language network is recruited but not required for nonverbal event semantics. Neurobio Lang. 2021;2(2):176–201
   Google Scholar
• Peper A. A theory of drug tolerance and dependence I: a conceptual analysis. J Theor Biol. 2004a;229:477–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peper A. A theory of drug tolerance and dependence II: the mathematical model. J Theor Biol. 2004b;229:491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou LW. Cognitive and neural contributions to understanding the conceptual system. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(2):91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick F, Koch C. Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Sem Neurosci. 1990;2:263–275.
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius N. Intersubjectivity, cognition, and language. In Gallagher, Shaun(editor). Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 301–316.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse MM. Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Top Cogn Sci. 2011;3(2):273–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson M, Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2002;9(4):625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese V, Lakoff G, The brain's concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005;22(3–4):455–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroni F, Semin GR. Language that puts you in touch with your bodily feelings: the multimodal responsiveness of affective expressions. Psychol Sci. 2009;20(8):974B980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman A, de Vignemont F. Is social cognition embodied? Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13(4):154–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman AI. The bodily formats approach to embodied cognition. In Kriegel, Uriah(editor) . Current controversies in philosophy of mind. Routledge; 2013. p. 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff G. Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8: Article 958 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim GM, Dell GS. Motor movement matters: the flexible abstractness of inner speech. Mem Cognit. 2010;38(8):1147–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecher D, Boot I, and Van Dantzig S. Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. InRoss, Brian H.(editor) . Psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 54. Academic Press; 2011. p. 217–248.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenemann PT. Conceptual complexity and the brain: understanding language origins. In: Wang WSY, Minett JW, editors. Language acquisition, change and emergence: essays in evolutionary linguistics. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press; 2005. p. 47–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett DS, Gazzaniga MS. Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(5):200–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser A. Visualization as a chief source of the psychology of Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley and Hume. Am J Psychol. 1891;4(2):230–247.
   Google Scholar
• Cann R, Kempson R, and Marten L. The dynamics of language: an introduction. Amsterdam, Netherlands:Elsevier Academic Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky N. An interview on minimalism. In: Chomsky N, editor. On Nature and Language. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 92–161.
   Google Scholar
• Clark A. Sensory and perceptual consciousness. The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. 2007: 445–455
   Google Scholar
• Cohen A. `why ambiguity?’ in between 40 and 60 puzzles for Manfred Krifka. In: Gaertner H-M, Beck S, Eckardt R, et al., eds. ZAS Berlin: Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Russell B. Vagueness. Australasian J Psychol Philo. 1923;1(2):84–92
   Google Scholar
• Wasow T, Perfors A, Beaver D. The puzzle of ambiguity. Morphology and the web of grammar: Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe. 2005: 265–282
   Google Scholar
• Deikman AJ. ‘I’ = awareness (1996). J Conscious Stud. 1996;3(4):350–356.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine L. A model of animal selfhood: expanding interactionist possibilities. Symbolic Interaction. 2004;27(1):3–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(1):14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PE, Meins E, Fernyhough C. Individual differences in children’s private speech: the role of imaginary companions. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013;116:561571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PE. How imaginary friends from our childhood can continue to affect us as adults. The Conversation; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS, Luria AR. In: tool and symbol in child development. In: Van der Veer R, Valsiner J editors. The Vygotsky reader. Cambridge MA: Blackwell; 1930. 1994. 99–174.
   Google Scholar
• Zeman A, Milton F, Della Sala S, et al. Phantasia – the psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex. 2020;130:426–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit E, Hoeflin C, Hamzah N, et al. An asymmetrical relationship between verbal and visual thinking: converging evidence from behavior and fMRI. NeuroImage. 2017;152:619–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Deep evolutionary origins of neurobiology. Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2(1):1–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baluška F, Reber A. Sentience and consciousness in single cells: how the first minds emerged in unicellular species. BioEssays. 2019;41(3):1800229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peper A, Grimbergen CA, Spaan JAE, et al. A mathematical model of the hsp70 regulation in the cell. Int J Hyperthermia. 1998;14(1):97–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn RE (2002). Visual language and converging technologies in the next 10-15 Years (and Beyond) A paper prepared for the National Science Foundation Conference on ConvergingTechnologies (Nano-BioInfo-Cogno) for Improving Human Performance, Arlington, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Patten BM. Visually mediated thinking: a report of the case of Albert Einstein. J Learn Disabil. 1973;6(7):415–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose R. The emperor’s new mind. Oxford New York Melbourne: Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin T. Thinking in pictures. New York NY: Vintage Press Random House; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mrazik M, Dombrowski SC. The neurobiological foundations of giftedness. 2010;Roeper Rev. 32:224234.
   Google Scholar