Comparison of kinematic and pressure measurement reference methods used in gait event detection

References

• Aminian, K., et al., 2002. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. Journal of Biomechanics, 35 (5), 689–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsson, E.K. and Mann, R.W., 1985. The frequency content of gait. Journal of Biomechanics, 18 (1), 39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchet, O., et al., 2008. Concurrent validity of SMTEC® footswitches system for the measurement of temporal gait parameters. Gait and Posture, 27 (1), 156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennetts, C.J., et al., 2013. Clustering and classification of regional peak plantar pressures of diabetic feet. Journal of Biomechanics, 46 (1), 19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bus, S.A., et al., 2009. Plantar pressure relief in the diabetic foot using forefoot offloading shoes. Gait and Posture, 29 (4), 618–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalfamo, P., et al., 2008. Detection of gait events using an F-Scan in-shoe pressure measurement system. Gait and Posture, 28 (3), 420–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalfamo, P., Ghoussayni, S., and Ewins, D., 2010. Gait event detection on level ground and incline walking using a rate gyroscope. Sensors, 10 (6), 5683–5702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, R., et al., 1996. Application of tilt sensors in functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 4 (2), 63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desailly, E., et al., 2009. Foot contact event detection using kinematic data in cerebral palsy children and normal adults gait. Gait and Posture, 29 (1), 76–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witt, J.K., 2010. Determination of toe-off event time during treadmill locomotion using kinematic data. Journal of Biomechanics, 43 (15), 3067–3069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoussayni, S.N., 2004. Application of angular rate gyroscopes as sensors in electrical orthoses for foot drop correction. Thesis (PhD). University of Surrey.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoussayni, S., et al., 2002. Gait event inspection: a comparison of force platform, visual inspection and kinematic algorithm based methods. In: ed. 7th annual meeting, gait and clinical movement analysis society. 17–20 April 2002 The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoussayni, S.N., et al., 2004. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. Gait and Posture, 20 (3), 266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, R.C., et al., 2010. Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations. Gait and Posture, 31 (3), 322–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., et al., 2009. Adaptive windowing for gait phase discrimination in Parkinsonian gait using 3-axis acceleration signals. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 47, 1155–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, M. and Anderson, R., 2009. Real-time gait event detection using wearable sensors. Gait and Posture, 30 (4), 523–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, E.C., van den Bogert, A.J., and Hamill, J., 2004. Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36 (5), 838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsak, B. and Baca, A., 2013. Effects of toning shoes on lower extremity gait biomechanics. Clinical Biomechanics, 28 (3), 344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavros, S.J., et al., 2011. Forefoot plantar pressure reduction of off-the-shelf rocker bottom provisional footwear. Clinical Biomechanics, 26 (7), 778–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, R.M., 2010. Comparison between kinematic and ground reaction force techniques for determining gait events during treadmill walking at different walking speeds. Medical Engineering and Physics, 32 (6), 662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, R., Smith, B.T., and Betz, R.R., 2005. Application of a neuro-fuzzy network for gait event detection using electromyography in the child with cerebral palsy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52 (9), 1532–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, E.B., Balan Sackiriyas, K.S., and Swen, R.W., 2011. A comparison of the spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and biomechanics between shod, unshod, and minimally supported running as compared to walking. Physical Therapy in Sport, 12 (4), 151–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Meyer, P., Sazonov, E., and Fulk, G., 2011. Automatic detection of temporal gait parameters in post-stroke individuals. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 15 (4), 594–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lythgo, N., Wilson, C., and Galea, M., 2009. Basic gait and symmetry measures for primary school-aged children and young adults whilst walking barefoot and with shoes. Gait and Posture, 30 (4), 502–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiwald, C., et al., 2009. Detecting foot-to-ground contact from kinematic data in running. Footwear Science, 1 (2), 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mickelborough, J., et al., 2000. Validity and reliability of a kinematic protocol for determining foot contact events. Gait and Posture, 11 (1), 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, S., 1997. Long-term unrestrained measurement of stride length and walking velocity utilizing a piezoelectric gyroscope. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44 (8), 753–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Hernández, A., et al., 2010. Temporal and spatial gait parameters analysis in non-pathological Mexican children. Gait and Posture, 32 (1), 78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris Bamberg, S.J., et al., 2008. Gait analysis using a shoe-integrated wireless sensor system. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 12 (4), 413–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C.M., et al., 2006. Automatic detection of gait events using kinematic data. Gait and Posture, 25 (3), 469–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantall, A., Gregor, R.J., and Prilutsky, B.I., 2012. Stance and swing phase detection during level and slope walking in the cat: effects of slope, injury, subject and kinematic detection method. Journal of Biomechanics, 45 (8), 1529–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I.P.I., et al., 2001. A Reliable gait phase detection system. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 9 (2), 113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C., Graham-Smith, P., and Jones, R., 2013. A comparison of plantar pressures in a standard flip-flop and a FitFlop using bespoke pressure insoles. Footwear Science, 5 (2), 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, A.M., et al., 2005. Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52 (3), 486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, A. and Wickström, N., 2010. A symbol-based approach to gait analysis from acceleration signals: identification and detection of gait events and a new measure of gait symmetry. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14 (5), 1180–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selles, R., et al., 2005. Automated estimation of initial and terminal contact timing using accelerometers; development and validation in transtibial amputees and controls. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 13 (1), 81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroyer, J.F. and Weimar, W.H., 2010. Comparative analysis of human gait while wearing thong-style flip-flops versus sneakers. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 100 (4), 251–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., et al., 2011. Evaluation of kinematic methods of identifying gait events during running. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 5 (3), 188–192.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B.T., et al., 2002. Evaluation of force-sensing resistors for gait event detection to trigger electrical stimulation to improve walking in the child with cerebral palsy. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10 (1), 22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokic, D.S., et al., 2009. Agreement between temporospatial gait parameters of an electronic walkway and a motion capture system in healthy and chronic stroke populations. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88 (6), 437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TenBroek, T.M., et al., 2013. Effects of unknown footwear midsole thickness on running kinematics within the initial six minutes of running. Footwear Science, 5 (1), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, K.E., Wittwer, J.E., and Feller, J.A., 2005. Validity of the GAITRite® walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait. Gait and Posture, 22 (4), 317–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, R. and Andrews, B., 2000. Sensor systems for lower limb functional electrical stimulation (FES) control. Medical Engineering and Physics, 22, 313–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeni Jr, J.A., Richards, J.G., and Higginson, J.S., 2008. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait and Posture, 27 (4), 710–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., et al., 2012. An unstable rocker-bottom shoe alters lower extremity biomechanics during level walking. Footwear Science, 4 (3), 243–253.
   Google Scholar