Segmented midsole hardness in the midfoot to forefoot region of running shoes alters subjective perception and biomechanics during heel-toe running revealing potential to enhance footwear

References

• Arndt, A., Wolf, P., Liu, C., Nester, C., Stacoff, A., Jones, R., … Lundberg, A. (2007). Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in vivo during the stance phase of slow running. Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 2672–2678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. B., & Bishop, C. (2013). Quantifying foot kinematics inside athletic footwear: A review. Footwear Science, 5, 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2240-05 international (reapproved 2010). Standard test method for rubber property – durometer hardness.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C., Arnold, J. B., Fraysse, F., & Thewlis, D. (2014). Does size matter? The influence of shoe-hole sizes on foot-mounted marker motion during walking gait. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 7(Suppl. 1), A7.
   Google Scholar
• Brauner, T., Sterzing, T., Gras, N., & Milani, T. L. (2009). Small changes in the varus alignment of running shoes allow gradual pronation control. Footwear Science, 1, 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Breine, B., Malcolm, P., Frederick, E. C., & de Clercq, D. (2014). Relationship between running speed and initial foot contact patterns. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 46, 1595–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. J., Davis, I. S., & Hamill, J. (2006). Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34, 1998–2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, T. E., Frederick, E. C., & Cooper, L. B. (1983). Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 4(4), 247–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, T. E., Frederick, E. C., & Hamill, C. L. (1983). The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 15(5), 376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Custoza, G. (2014). Innovative Methode zur nicht-invasiven Erfassung der Kinematik des Fußes im Schuh [Innovative method for non-invasive measurement of foot kinematics inside the shoe] (MSc Thesis). Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2011). Statistics without maths for psychology. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Divert, C., Mornieux, G., Baur, H., Mayer, F., & Belli, A. (2005). Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 26, 593–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, M., & Hennig, E. M. (2009). Effects of different shoe-lacing patterns on the biomechanics of running shoes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, E. C., van den Bogert, & A. J., Hamill, J. (2004). Kinematic adaptations during running: Effects of footwear, surface, and duration. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, H., Yamauchi, T., & Kraemer, W. (2007). Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21, 888–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenfelder, J., Sterzing, T., & Milani, T. L. (2010). Crash-pad thickness systematically reduces impact shock in running shoes. Footwear Science, 2, 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, E., & Sterzing, T. (2009). Sensitivity mapping of the human foot: Thresholds at 30 skin locations. Foot and Ankle International, 30, 986–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, P. W., Lim, C. Y., Ding, R., & Sterzing, T. (in press). Running shoe perception depends on country and assessment method: A bi-national study.
   Google Scholar
• Kunde, S., Sterzing, T., & Milani, T. L. (2008). Gender differences of 2-point touch sensitivity thresholds of the human foot. Ann Arbor, MI: NACOB.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. K., Sterzing, T., & Cheung, J. T.-M. (2013). Influence of protocol complexity on fit perception of basketball footwear. Footwear Science, 5, 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, P., Higgins, E., Kaminski, J., Decker, T., Preble, J., Lyons, D., … Normile, A. (2011). Foot strike patterns of recreational and sub-elite runners in a long-distance road race. Journal of Sport Sciences, 29, 1665–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leardini, A., Benedetti, M. G., Berti, L., Bettinelli, D., Nativo, R., & Giannini, S. (2007). Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait & Posture, 25, 453–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinger, P., Murley, G. S., Barton, C. J., Cotchett, M. P., McSweeny, S. R., & Menz, H. B. (2010). A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford foot model. Gait & Posture, 32, 519–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, P., Nester, C., Liu, A., Arndt, A., Jones, R., Stacoff, A., … Lundberg, A. (2008). Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. Gait & Posture, 28, 93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T. L., Hennig, E. M., & Lafortune, M. A. (1997). Perceptual and biomechanical variables for running in identical shoe constructions with varying midsole hardness. Clinical Biomechanics, 12, 294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K., Blanch, P., & Vicenzino, B. (2010). Identifying clinically meaningful tools for measuring comfort perception of footwear. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 42, 1966–1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morio, C., Lake, M. J., Gueguen, N., Rao, G., & Baly, L. (2009). The influence of footwear on foot motion during walking and running. Journal of Biomechanics, 42, 2081–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mündermann, A., Nigg, B., Stefanyshyn, D., & Humble, R. (2002). Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running. Gait & Posture, 16, 38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nester, C., Jones, R. K., Liu, A., Howard, D., Lundberg, A., Arndt, A., … Wolf, P. (2007). Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 3412–3423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg, B. M. (2001). The role of impact forces and foot pronation: A new paradigm. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine: Official Journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, 11(1), 2–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg, B. M. (2010). Biomechanics of sport shoes. Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary, Topline Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Nigg, B. M., & Bahlsen, H. A. (1988). Influence of heel flare and midsole construction on pronation, supination, and impact forces for heel-toe running. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 4, 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg, B. M., Bahlsen, A. H., Denoth, J., Lüthi, S., & Stacoff, A. (1986). Factors influencing kinetic and kinematic variables in running. In: B. M. Nigg (Ed.), Biomechanics of running shoes (pp. 139–160). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Nigg, B. M., Bahlsen, H. A., Luethi, S. M., & Stokes, S. (1987). The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 951–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg, B. M., Stergiou, P., Cole, G., Stefanyshyn, D., Mündermann, A., & Humble, N. (2003). Effect of shoe inserts on kinematics, center of pressure, and leg joint moments during running. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, 314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriwol, D., Sterzing, T., & Milani, T. L. (2011). The position of medial dual density in running shoes does not influence biomechanical variables. Footwear Science, 3, 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Reinschmidt, C., van den Bogert, A. J., Murphy, N., Lundberg, A., & Nigg, B. (1997). Tibiocalcaneal motion during running, measured with external and bone markers. Clinical Biomechanics, 12, 8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2009). Effect sizes; why, when and how to use them. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 217(1), 6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, R., & Jenkyn, T. (2012). Determining the maximum diameter for holes in the shoe without compromising shoe integrity when using a multi-segment foot model. Medical Engineering & Physics, 34, 118–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzing, T., Lam, W. K., & Cheung, J. T.-M. (2012). Athletic footwear research by industry and academia. In: R. S. Goonetilleke (Ed.), The science of footwear (pp. 605–622). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sterzing, T., Schweiger, V., Ding, R., Cheung, J. T.-M., & Brauner, T. (2013). Influence of rearfoot and forefoot midsole hardness on biomechanical and perception variables during heel-toe running. Footwear Science, 5, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tay, C. S., Sterzing, T., Lim, C. Y., Ding, R., & Kong, P. W. (2014). Multiple regression of running footwear perception factors on overall preference. Chinese Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 10(S1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. J., Arnold, B. L., Coffey, T. G., & Pidcoe, P. E. (2011). Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults. Gait & Posture, 33, 108–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar