Women perception of shoe cushioning as a function of mechanical properties of footwear using a sensory trained panel method^†

References

• Association Française de Normalisation. (2007). Sensory characterisation of materials — Practical recommendations for use situation perception tests. BP X10-044. La Plaine Saint Denis, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM F1976–13. (2013). Standard test method for impact attenuation of athletic shoe cushioning systems and materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Baltich, J., Maurer, C., & Nigg, B.M. (2015). Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes. PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, B., De Clercq, D., & Lenoir, M. (1995). The effect of varying midsole hardness on impact forces and foot motion during foot contact in running. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 11(4), 395–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delattre, N., Chambon, N., Berton, E., Gueguen, N., & Rao, G. (2013). Effect of time during a running session with minimal footwear. Footwear Science, 5(Suppl. 1), S113–S114.
   Google Scholar
• Divert, C., Baur, H., Mornieux, G., Mayer, F., & Belli, A. (2005). Stiffness adaptations in shod running. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 21(4), 311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, E.C. (2013). Quantifying the physical and functional characteristics of footwear. Footwear Science, 5(Suppl. 1), S11–S12.
   Google Scholar
• Goonetilleke, R.S. (1999). Footwear cushioning: Relating objective and subjective measurements. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(2), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, A., Edwards, W., & Miller, R. (2016, August). Characteristics of the extracted impact component distinguish between prospective running injury development and controls. Paper presented at the 40th American Society of Biomechanics Annual Meeting, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, H., Yamauchi, T., & Kraemer, W. (2007). Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21(3), 888–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig, E.M., & Schulz, J. (2011). Subjective evaluation of biomechanical shoe properties during blinded and non-blinded running. Footwear Science, 3(Suppl. 1), S75–S76.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, E.M., Valiant, G.A., & Liu, Q. (1996). Biomechanical variables and the perception of cushioning for running in various types of footwear. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 12(2), 143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, H.T., & Heymann, H. (1999). Sensory evaluation of food — Principles and practices, New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lê, S., & Worch, T. (2015). Analyzing sensory data with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, N.M., Collins, P.K., Bonacci, J., Piland, S.G., Rawlins, J.W., & Gould, T.E. (2017). Mechanical ageing performance of minimalist and traditional footwear foams. Footwear Science, 9(1), 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malisoux, L., Delattre, N., Urhausen, A., & Theisen, D. (2017). Shoe cushioning, body mass and running biomechanics as risk factors for running injury: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 7(8), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T.L., Hennig, E.M., & Lafortune, M.A. (1997). Perceptual and biomechanical variables for running in identical shoe constructions with varying midsole hardness. Clinical Biomechanics, 12(5), 294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg, B.M., Bahlsen, H.A., Leuthi, S.M., & Stokes, S. (1988). Effect of midsole hardness and running velocity. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 4(4), 393.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, K., Vorpahl, K.A., & Heiderscheit, B. (2008). Effect of cushioned insoles on impact forces during running. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 98(1), 36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagès, J., Bertrand, C., Ali, R., Husson, F., & Lê, S. (2007). Sensory analysis comparison of eight biscuits by French and Pakistani panels. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22(6), 665–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisciotta, E.J., & Shorten, M. (2013). Perception of running shoe cushioning: Wear test vs controlled experiment. Footwear Science, 5(Suppl. 1), S136–S138.
   Google Scholar
• Running USA. (2016). State of the sport – U.S. road race trends report. Retrieved from www.runningusa.org/state-of-sport-us-trends-2015
   Google Scholar
• Shorten, M., & Mientjes, M.I.V. (2011). The “heel impact” force peak during running is neither “heel” nor “impact” and does not quantify shoe cushioning effects. Footwear Science, 3(1), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolowsky, M., & Fischer, U. (2012). Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta, 732, 46–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzing, T., Schweiger, V., Ding, R., Cheung, J.T.-M., & Brauner, T. (2013). Influence of rearfoot and forefoot midsole hardness on biomechanical and perception variables during heel-toe running. Footwear Science, 5(2), 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Theisen, D., Malisoux, L., Delattre, N., Seil, R., & Urhausen, A. (2014). Does running shoe midsole hardness influence running-related injuries? Results from a double blind randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(7), 664.
   Google Scholar
• van der Worp, H., Vrielink, J.W., & Bredeweg, S.W. (2016). Do runners who suffer injuries have higher vertical ground reaction forces than those who remain injury-free? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(8), 450–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verriele, M., Plaisance, H., Vandenbilcke, V., Locoge, N., Jaubert, J.N., & Meunier, G. (2012). Odor evaluation and discrimination of car cabin and its components: Application of the “field of odors” approach in a sensory descriptive analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies, 27(2), 102–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withnall, R., Eastaugh, J., & Freemantle, N. (2006). Do shock absorbing insoles in recruits undertaking high levels of physical activity reduce lower limb injury? A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(1), 32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar