722
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

More isn’t always better

Pages 75-77 | Received 04 Dec 2019, Accepted 26 Dec 2019, Published online: 10 Jan 2020

References

  • Baltich, J., Maurer, C., & Nigg, B. M. (2015). Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes. PLoS One, 10, e0125196. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125196
  • Burns, G. T., & Tam, N. (2019). Is it the shoes? A simple proposal for regulating footwear in road running. British Journal of Sports Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-100480
  • Clarke, T. E., Frederick, E. C., & Hamill, C. L. (1983). The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 15, 376–381.
  • Frederick, E. C. (2019). No evidence of a performance advantage attributable to midsole thickness. Footwear Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19424280.2019.1690327
  • Frederick, E. C., Daniels, J. T., & Hayes, J. W. (1984). The effect of shoe weight on the aerobic demands of running. In N. Bachl, L. Prokop, & R. Suckert (Eds), Current topics in sports medicine, Proceedings of the World Congress of Sports Medicine (pp. 616–625). Vienna: Urban and Schwarzenberg.
  • Frederick, E. C., Howley, E. T., & Powers, S. K. (1986). Lower oxygen cost while running in soft soled shoes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 174–177. doi:10.1080/02701367.1986.10762196
  • Hannigan, J. J., & Pollard, C. D. (2019). A 6-week transition to maximal running shoes does not change running biomechanics. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 47, 968–973. doi:10.1177/0363546519826086
  • Hannigan, J. J., & Pollard, C. D. (2020). Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe. Journal of Science in Medicine in Sport, 23(1), 15–19. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.008
  • Hoogkamer, W., Kipp, S., Frank, J. H., Farina, E. M., Luo, G., & Kram, R. (2018). A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes. Sports Medicine, 48(4), 1009–1019. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2
  • Hoogkamer, W., Kipp, S., & Kram, R. (2019). The biomechanics of competitive male runners in three marathon racing shoes: A randomized crossover study. Sports Medicine, 49(1), 133–143. doi:10.1007/s40279-018-1024-z
  • Hoogkamer, W., Kipp, S., Spiering, B. A., & Kram, R. (2016). Altered running economy directly translates to altered distance-running performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48, 2175–2180. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001012
  • Mercer, M. A., Stone, T. M., Young, J. C., & Mercer, J. A. (2018). Running economy while running in shoes categorized as maximal cushioning. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 11, 1031–1040. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000485031.67140.17
  • Tung, K. D., Franz, J. R., & Kram, R. (2014). A test of the metabolic cost of cushioning hypothesis during unshod and shod running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 46, 324–329. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a63b81
  • Worobets, J., Wannop, J. W., Tomaras, E., & Stefanyshyn, D. (2014). Softer and more resilient running shoe cushioning properties enhance running economy. Footwear Science, 6, 147–153. doi:10.1080/19424280.2014.918184

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.