4,245
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Towards a biomechanical understanding of performance improvement with advanced running shoes

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alger, K. (2019, May 15). Sole sensations: The bottom bits of the latest running shoes, explained. Runner’s World. https://www.runnersworld.com/uk/gear/shoes/a27476498/running-shoes-sole-explained/
  • Barnes, K. R., & Kilding, A. E. (2019). A randomized crossover study investigating the running economy of highly-trained male and female distance runners in marathon racing shoes versus track spikes. Sports Medicine, 49(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-1012-3
  • Bruening, D. A., Cooney, K. M., & Buczek, F. L. (2012). Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model part II: Kinetics and clinical implications. Gait & Posture, 35(4), 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2011.11.012
  • Burns, G. T., & Tam, N. (2020). Is it the shoes? A simple proposal for regulating footwear in road running. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(8), 439–440. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100480
  • Chambon, N., Delattre, N., Guéguen, N., Berton, E., & Rao, G. (2015). Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 115(5), 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00421-014-3072-X
  • D’Lima, D. D., Fregly, B. J., Patil, S., Steklov, N., & Colwell, C. W., Jr (2012). Knee joint forces: Prediction, measurement, and significance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 226(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411911433372
  • García-Pérez, J. A., Pérez-Soriano, P., Llana, S., Martínez-Nova, A., & Sánchez-Zuriaga, D. (2013). Effect of overground vs treadmill running on plantar pressure: Influence of fatigue. Gait & Posture, 38(4), 929–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2013.04.026
  • Healey, L., & Hoogkamer, W. (2021). Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly shoes. SportRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.07.002
  • Hébert-Losier, K., Finlayson, S. J., Driller, M. W., Dubois, B., Esculier, J. F., & Beaven, C. M. (2022). Metabolic and performance responses of male runners wearing 3 types of footwear: Nike Vaporfly 4%, Saucony Endorphin racing flats, and their own shoes. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 11(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.012
  • Hoogkamer, W., Kipp, S., Frank, J. H., Farina, E. M., Luo, G., & Kram, R. (2018). A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes. Sports Medicine, 48, 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2
  • Hoogkamer, W., Kipp, S., & Kram, R. (2019). The biomechanics of competitive male runners in three marathon racing shoes: A randomized crossover study. Sports Medicine, 49(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-1024-z
  • Kipp, S., Kram, R., & Hoogkamer, W. (2019). Extrapolating metabolic savings in running: Implications for performance predictions. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00079
  • McDonald, K. A., Honert, E. C., Cook, O. S., & Zelik, K. E. (2019). Unholey shoes: Experimental considerations when estimating ankle joint complex power during walking and running. Journal of Biomechanics, 92, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2019.05.031
  • Morgan, D. W., Martin, P. E., & Krahenbuhl, G. S. (1989). Factors affecting running economy. Sports Medicine, 7(5), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198907050-00003
  • Neogi, T. (2013). The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 21(9), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOCA.2013.03.018
  • Nigg, B. M., Cigoja, S., & Nigg, S. R. (2020). Effects of running shoe construction on performance in long distance running. Footwear Science, 12(3), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2020.1778799
  • Nigg, B. M., Cigoja, S., & Nigg, S. R. (2021). Teeter-totter effect: A new mechanism to understand shoe-related improvements in long-distance running. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(9), 462–463. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102550
  • Patoz, A., Lussiana, T., Breine, B., & Gindre, C. (2022). The Nike Vaporfly 4%: A game changer to improve performance without biomechanical explanation yet. Footwear Science, 14, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2022.2077844
  • Ramsey, C. A., Lamb, P., Kaur, M., David Baxter, G., Cury, D., & Cury Ribeiro, D. (2019). How are running shoes assessed? A systematic review of characteristics and measurement tools used to describe running footwear. Journal of Sports Sciences. 37(14), 1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1578449
  • Subramanium, A., & Nigg, B. (2021). Exploring the teeter-totter effect in shoes with curved carbon fibre plates. Footwear Science, 13(sup1), S74–S75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2021.1917689
  • Van Caekenberghe, I., Segers, V., Willems, P., Gosseye, T., Aerts, P., & De Clercq, D. (2013). Mechanics of overground accelerated running vs. running on an accelerated treadmill. Gait & Posture, 38(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2012.10.022
  • Van Hooren, B., Fuller, J. T., Buckley, J. D., Miller, J. R., Sewell, K., Rao, G., Barton, C., Bishop, C., & Willy, R. W. (2020). Is motorized treadmill running biomechanically comparable to overground running? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-over studies. Sports Medicine, 50(4), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z