The Obsolescence of Formocresol

REFERENCES

• Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, et al, Do we still need formocresol in pediatric dentistry?. J Can Dent Assoc 71(10):749–51. November 2005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milnes AR, Is formocresol obsolete? A fresh look at the evidence concerning safety issues. J Endod 34(7 suppl):S40–6, July 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan C, Stanfill SB, et al, Automated determination of seven phenolic compounds in mainstream tobacco smoke. Nicotine Tob Res 10(7):1261–8, July 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Qu M, et al, Genotoxicity study of phenol and o-cresol using the micronucleus test and the comet assay. Toxicologic Environmental Chem 87(3):365–72, July–September 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis BB, Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review of mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. J Am Dent Assoc 103(3):429–34, September 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis B, Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review for the millennium. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22(2):167–77, Winter 1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, The formaldehyde debate. J Am Dent Assoc 104(6):816, 818, June 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, Formaldehyde in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 124(9):14, 16, September 1993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, Safety of formocresol in dentistry. J Okla Dent Assoc 99(7):8, April–May 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, Safety of formocresol contested. J Calif Dent Assoc 36(5):323, May 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, Formocresol use unwarranted. NY State Dent J 74(3):10, April 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, Safety of formocresol. J Ir Dent Assoc 54(3):108, June–July 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis BB, Formocresol in dentistry. Br Dent J 10;204(9):477, May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fuks AB, Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and Treatment perspectives. Pediatr Dent 30(3):211–9, May–June 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon RK, Chussid S, et al, Preferred treatment methods for primary tooth vital pulpotomies. A survey. NY State Dent J 74(2):47–9, March 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunston B, Coll JA, A survey of primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in U.S. dental schools and practiced by diplomates of the American Board Of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent 30(1):42–8, January–February 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seale NS, Glickman GN, Contemporary perspectives on vital pulp therapy: views from the endodontists and pediatric dentists. Pediatr Dent 30(3):261–7, May–June 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coll JA, Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date. Pediatr Dent 30(3):230–6, May–June 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milnes AR, Is formocresol obsolete? A fresh look at the evidence concerning safety issues. J Endod 34(7 suppl):S44, July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby JD, Personal communication via email. University of Alabama, Birmingham, Department of Pediatric Dentistry. Oct. 10, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dhareshwar SS, Stella VJ, Your prodrug releases formaldehyde: should you be concerned? No. J Pharm Sci 97(10):4184–93, October 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belpomme D, Irigaray P, et al, The multitude and diversity of environmental carcinogens. Environ Res 105(3):414–29, November 2007. E-pub Aug 9, 2007. Comment in: Environ Res 107(2):288; discussion 289–90, June 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cogliano V, Grosse Y, et al, Meeting report: summary of IARC Monographs on formaldehyde, 2-utoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol. Environmental Health Perspectives, September 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Steinmaus C, et al, Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia: a new meta-analysis and potential mechanisms. Elsevier B.V., July 15, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro DA, Do endodontic compounds induce genetic damage? A comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105(2):251–6, February 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeiro DA, Scolastici C, , Genotoxicity of antimicrobial endodontic compounds by single cell gel (comet) assay in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99(5):637–40, May 2005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeiro DA, Marques ME, Salvadori DM, Lack of genotoxicity of formocresol, paramonochlorophenol, and calcium hydroxide on mammalian cells by comet assay. J Endod 30(8):593–6, August 2004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milnes AR, Persuasive evidence that formocresol use in pediatric dentistry is safe. J Can Dent Assoc 72(3):247–8, April 2006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagiwara M, Watanabe E, et al, Assessment of genotoxicity of 14 chemical agents used in dental practice: ability to induce chromosome aberrations in Syrian hamster embryo cells. Mutat Res 28;603(2):111–20, February2006. E-pub Jan. 6, 2006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nishimura H, Higo Y, et al, Ability of root canal antiseptics used in dental practice to induce chromosome aberrations in human dental pulp cells. Mutat Res 8;649(1–2):45–53, January 2008. E-pub Aug. 3, 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hikiba H, Watanabe E, et al, Ability of 14 chemical agents used in dental practice to induce chromosome aberrations in Syrian hamster embryo cells. J Pharmacol Sci 97(1):146–52, January 2005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortés O, Fernández J, et al, Effect of formaldehyde on rat liver in doses used in pulpotomies J Clin Pediatr Dent 31(3):179–82, Spring 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamaguchi F, Tsutsui T, Assessment of genotoxicity of dental antiseptics: ability of phenol, guaiacol, p-phenolsulfonic acid, sodium hypochlorite, p-chlorophenol, m-cresol or formaldehyde to induce unscheduled dna synthesis in cultured syrian hamster embryo cells. Jpn Pharmacol 83(3):273–6, July 2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Speit G, Merk O, Evaluation of mutagenic effects of formaldehaCaioaitro:Cetectionofuruutlinks and mutations in mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 17(3):183–7, May 2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z-S, Yan Y, et al, Studies on genotoxicity of gaseous formaldehyde on human buccal cells. China Environ Sci 23(6):566–9, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• PA Zarzar, A Rosenblatt, et al, Formocresol mutagenicity following primary tooth pulp therapy: an in vivo study. J Dent 31(7): 479, 2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavoue J, Vincent R, Gerin M, Formaldehyde exposure in U.S. industries from OSHA air sampling data. J Occup Environ Hyg 5(9):575–87, September 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chédid JC, Pilipili C, A 24-month evaluation of zinc oxide pulpotomy on primary canines. Rev Beige Med Dent 63(2):69–76, 2008 (French).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caceda JH, The use of resin-based composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic) 74(2):147–50, May–August 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vargas KG, Kaaren B, Lowman D, Preliminary evaluation of sodium hypochlorite for pulptomies in primary molars. Pediatric Dent 28(6):511–7, November–December 2006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calderon, L, et al, Abstract of presentation at the 2007 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Gao HY, Li WY, et al, Histopathology research of cinnamaldehyde as pulp-cap of pulpotomy in rats. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 25(5):429–31, October 2007. (Chinese.)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng L, Ye L, et al, Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 40(10):751–7, October 2007. E-pub Aug. 22, 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonmez D, Sari S, Cetinbaş T, A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. J Endod 34(8):950–5, August 2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng FK, Messer LB, Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: an evidence-based assessment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9(2):58–73, June 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moretti AB, Sakai VT, et al, The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Int Endod J 41(7):547–55, July 2008. E-pub May 12, 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zurn D, Seale NS, Light-cured calcium hydroxide versus formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 30(1):34–41, January–February 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noorollahian H, Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Br Dent J 204(11):E20, June 14, 2008. E-pub April 18, 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shayegan A, Petein M, Abbeele AV, Beta-tricalcium phosphate, white mineral trioxide aggregate, white Portland cement, ferric sulfate, and formocresol used as pulpotomy agents in primary pig teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105(4):536–42, April 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabbarini J, Mohamed A, et al, Comparison of enamel matrix derivative versus formocresol as pulpotomy agents in the primary dentition. J Endod 34(3):284–7, March 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng FK, Messer LB, Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: a narrative review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9(1):4–11, March 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haney KL, Current trends in primary tooth pulp therapy. J Okla Dent Assoc 99(2):28–37; quiz 38, October 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Innes N, Better outcomes in pulpotomies on primary molars with MTA. Comment on. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 0ral Radiol Endod 102(6):e40–4, December 2006. Evid Based Dent 8(1):11–2, 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aeinehchi M, Dadvand S, et al, Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Evid Based Dent 8(4):107, 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahrololoomi Z, Moeintaghavi A, et al, Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res 19(3):219–23, July–September 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toomarian L, Fekrazad R, et al, Histopathological evaluation of pulpotomy with Er,Cr:YSGG laser versus formocresol. Lasers Med Sci 23(4):443–50, October 2008. E-pub Oct. 24, 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odabaş ME, Bodur H, et al, Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth. J Endod 33(4):415–21, April 2007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rennard BO, Ertl RF, et al, Chicken soup inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro. Chest 118:1150–7, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuks AB, Papagiannoulis L, Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 7(2):64–71; discussion 72, June 2006. Comment in Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 7(3):124, September 2006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuks AB, Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. J Endod 34(7 Suppl):S18–24, July 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar