Development of comprehensive service quality assessment framework for sidewalks considering desired and actual conditions

References

• Aghaabbasi, M., M. Moeinaddini, Z. Asadi-Shekari, and M. Z. Shah. 2019. “The Equitable Use Concept in Sidewalk Design.” Cities 88: 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Azzawi, M., and R. Raeside. 2007. “Modeling Pedestrian Walking Speeds on Sidewalks.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 133 (3): 211–219. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi-Shekari, Z., M. Moeinaddini, and M. Z. Shah. 2014. “A Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Walking Facilities on Campus Streets.” Land Use Policy 38: 175–193. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. 2010. “Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities: State and Issues.”. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. ISSN: 2071-9450.
   Google Scholar
• Ayag, Z., and R. G. Ozdemir. 2006. “A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Machine Tool Alternatives.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17 (2): 179–190. doi:10.1007/s10845-005-6635-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayhan, M. B. 2013. “A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in A Gear Motor Company.” International Journal of Managing Value Supply Chains 4 (3): 11–23. doi:10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302.
   Google Scholar
• Bivina, G. R., and M. Parida. 2019. “Prioritizing Pedestrian Needs Using a Multi-criteria Decision Approach for a Sustainable Built Environment in the Indian Context.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10668-019-00381-w.
   Google Scholar
• Bivina, G. R., P. Parida, M. Advani, and M. Parida. 2018. “Pedestrian Level of Service Model for Evaluating and Improving Sidewalks from Various Land Uses.” EUROPEAN TRANSPORT-TRASPORTI EUROPEI 67 (2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324219681
   Google Scholar
• Chang, D. Y. 1996. “Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP.” European Journal of Operational Research 95 (3): 649–655. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. M. 1996. “Evaluating Weapon Systems Using Fuzzy Arithmetic Operations.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 77 (3): 265–276. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(95)00096-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W., and H. Li. 2002. “Construction Partnering Process and Associated Critical Success Factors: Quantitative Investigation.” Journal of Management in Engineering 18 (4): 194–202. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulou, P., and M. Pitsiava-Latinopoulou. 2012. “Development of a Model for the Estimation of Pedestrian Level of Service in Greek Urban Areas.” Procedia-social and Behavioural Sciences 48: 1691–1701. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1144.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Scientific and Industrialist Research-Central Road Research Institute. 2017. “Indian Highway Capacity Manual.”. New Delhi. India: Central Road Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dağdeviren, M., İ. Yüksel, and M. Kurt. 2008. “A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP) Model to Identify Faulty Behavior Risk (FBR) in Work System.” Safety Science 46 (5): 771–783. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaf, M., A. Sabri, M. Abou-Zeid, and I. Kaysi. 2020. “Pedestrian–vehicular Interactions in a Mixed Street Environment.” Transportation Letters 12 (2): 87–99. doi:10.1080/19427867.2018.1525821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandan, T. A. N., W. A. N. G. Wei, L. U. Jian, and B. I. A. N. Yang. 2007. “Research on Methods of Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service for Sidewalk.” Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 7 (5): 74–79. doi:10.1016/S1570-6672(07)60041-5.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, B. D., M. Nor, S. Naquiyah, M. M. Rohani, J. Prasetijo, M. Y. Aman, and K. Ambak, 2016. “Pedestrian Footpath Level of Service (FOOT-LOS) Model for Johor Bahru.” In MATEC Web of Conferences. Malaysia. (Vol. 47). doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20164703006.
   Google Scholar
• Das, P., 2011. “Selection of Business Strategies for Quality Improvement Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process.” In 5th International Quality Conference, May 20th, 2011. Center for Quality, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. Kragujevac, Serbia, University of Kragujevac. http://www.cqm.rs/2011/cd/5iqc/pdf/094.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Transport: Western Australia, 2011. “Walkability Audit Tool.” http://www.beactive.wa.gov.au/assets/files/Guidelines/Walkability%20Audit%20Tool%20July%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, L. B. 1996. “Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems.” Transportation Research Record 1538 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1177/0361198196153800101.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., S. Handy, R. C. Brownson, O. Clemente, and E. Winston. 2006. “Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3 (s1): S223–S240. doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florez, J., J. Muniz, and L. Portugal. 2014. “Pedestrian Quality of Service: Lessons from Maracanã Stadium.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 160: 130–139. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.124.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, F., and M. Kumar. 2000. “INTSERVQUAL-an Internal Adaptation of the GAP Model in a Large Service Organisation.” Journal of Services Marketing 14 (5): 358–377. doi:10.1108/08876040010340991.
   Google Scholar
• Fruin, J. J. 1971. “Pedestrian Planning and Design.” In Metropolitan Associations of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners. New York: Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Galanis, A., and N. Eliou. 2011. “Evaluation of the Pedestrian Infrastructure Using Walkability Indicators.” WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 7 (12): 385–394. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/environment/2011/54-653.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, A., A. Skoufas, and S. Basbas. 2021. “Perceived Pedestrian Level of Service in an Urban Central Network: The Case of a Medium Size Greek City.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 9 (2): 889–905. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulc, A. 2017. “Models and Methods of Measuring the Quality of Logistic Service.” Procedia Engineering 182: 255–264. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.187.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, D., and P. Tadikamalla. 1996. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process in an Uncertain Environment: A Simulation Approach.” European Journal of Operational Research 91 (1): 27–37. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00002-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highway Capacity Manual. 2000. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1207. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• The Indian Roads Congress. 2012. IRC:103-2012. Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities. New Delhi. India: IRC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, F. 2000. “Pedestrian Level of Service Based on Trip Quality.” In TRB Circular E-C019:Urban Street Symposium, G1–G14. Dallas, Texas: Transportation Research Board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec019/Ec019_g1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. U. 2007. “Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments.” Transportation Research Record 2031 (1): 43–51. doi:10.3141/2031-06.
   Google Scholar
• Juremalani, D., and K. Chauhan. 2017. “Study of Correlation between Urban Physical Environment and Walkability for Cities of “Y” Category in Indian Context Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Simple Additive Weighing Methods of Multi Criteria Decision Making.” Indian Journal of Science and Technology 10 (17): 1–6. http://52.172.159.94/index.php/indjst/article/view/114379/79938
   Google Scholar
• Kadali, B. R., and P. Vedagiri. 2015. “Evaluation of Pedestrian Crosswalk Level of Service (LOS) in Perspective of Type of Land-use.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 73: 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas, P., and H. Tuydes-Yaman. 2018. “Variability in Sidewalk Pedestrian Level of Service Measures and Rating.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 144 (4): 04018042(1–12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khisty, C. J. 1994. “Evaluation of Pedestrian Facilities: Beyond the Level-of-Service Concept.” Transportation Research Record 1438: 45–50. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1438/1438-006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., J. Choi, and S. Kim. 2013. “Roadside Walking Environments and Major Factors Affecting Pedestrian Level of Service.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 17 (3): 304–315. doi:10.1080/12265934.2013.825422.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, P. P., and Y. D. Wong. 2013. “Comparing Pedestrians’ Needs and Behaviours in Different Land Use Environments.” Journal of Transport Geography 26: 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krambeck, H. V., 2006. “The global walkability index (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).”. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34409
   Google Scholar
• Landis, B. W., V. R. Vattikuti, R. M. Ottenberg, D. S. McLeod, and M. Guttenplan. 2001. “Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service.” Transportation Research Record 1773 (1): 82–88. doi:10.3141/1773-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, E., N. Szibbo, W. Eisenstein, and L. Mozingo. 2017. “Quality-of-service: Toward a Standardized Rating Tool for Pedestrian Quality of Urban Streets.” Journal of Urban Design 23 (1): 71–93. doi:10.1080/13574809.2017.1340092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, B. B., and S. Mitra. 2018. “Development of Level of Service Criteria for Evaluation of Bicycle Suitability.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 144 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marisamynathan, S., and S. Lakshmi. 2016. “Method to Determine Pedestrian Level of Service for Sidewalks in Indian Context.” Transportation Letters 10 (5): 294–301. doi:10.1080/19427867.2016.1264668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mōri, M., and H. Tsukaguchi. 1987. “A New Method for Evaluation of Level of Service in Pedestrian Facilities.” Transportation Research Part A: General 21 (3): 223–234. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(87)90016-1.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, F., P. Cambra, and A. B. Gonçalves. 2017. “Measuring Walkability for Distinct Pedestrian Groups with A Participatory Assessment Method: A Case Study in Lisbon.” Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 282–296. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabipour, M., S. H. Nasseri, and E. Tavakoli Saber. 2021. “Comparison and Evaluation of Built Environment Factors for Developing Pedestrian Urban Travels.” Fuzzy Information and Engineering 1–17. doi:10.1080/16168658.2021.2002664.
   Google Scholar
• Nag, D., A. K. Goswami, A. Gupta, and J. Sen. 2020. “Assessing Urban Sidewalk Networks Based on Three Constructs: A Synthesis of Pedestrian Level of Service Literature.” Transport Reviews 40 (2): 204–240. doi:10.1080/01441647.2019.1703841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nukala, S., and S. M. Gupta, 2005. “A Fuzzy AHP Based Approach for Selecting Potential Recovery Facilities in A Closed-loop Supply Chain.” In Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing V. Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5997: 58–63. doi: 10.1117/12.631251.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1985. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.” Journal of Marketing 49 (4): 41–50. doi:10.1177/002224298504900403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parida, P. N., and M. Parida. 2007. “Development of Qualitative Evaluation Methodology for Sidewalks in Delhi.” ITPI Journal 4 (3): 27–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267856517.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rani, K., A. Boora, G. R. Bivina, and M. Parida, 2017. “Which Factors Affect “Walkability” of Pedestrians in Indian Cities?” 12th International Conference on Eastern Asian Society of Transportation Studies (EASTS-2017): Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnum. 11–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325464843
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi, R., S. Chandra, and M. Mohan. January 2014. “Development of Level of Service Criteria for Pedestrians.” Journal of the Indian Roads Congress. 75 (1): 61–70. https://trid.trb.org/view/1312718
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process McGraw Hill, New York.” Agricultural Economics Review 70.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1981. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sahani, R., A. Ojha, and P. K. Bhuyan. 2017. “Service Levels of Sidewalks for Pedestrians under Mixed Traffic Environment Using Genetic Programming Clustering.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 21 (7): 2879–2887. doi:10.1007/s12205-017-0042-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezhian, M. V., C. Muralidharan, T. Nambirajan, and S. G. Deshmukh. 2011. “Performance Measurement in a Public Sector Passenger Bus Transport Company Using Fuzzy TOPSIS, Fuzzy AHP and ANOVA–a Case Study.” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST) 3 (2): 1046–1059. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50392343.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M. Z., and A. N. R. D. Silva. 2010. “Pedestrian Infrastructures and Sustainable Mobility in Developing Countries: The Cases of Brazil and Malaysia.” In XVI PANAM. Lisbon, Portugal: Panam Conference Proceedings. http://redpgv.coppe.ufrj.br/index.php/pt-BR/producao-da-rede/artigos-cientificos/2010-1/460
   Google Scholar
• Sisiopiku, V. P., and J. E. Byrd 2006. “Comparison of Level-of-service Methodologies for Pedestrian Sidewalks.” 85th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board 6-0898). https://trid.trb.org/view/776584
   Google Scholar
• Sutikno, F. R., and E. B. Kurniawan. 2013. “Walkability and Pedestrian Perceptions in Malang City Emerging Business Corridor.” Procedia Environmental Sciences 17: 424–433. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.056.
   Google Scholar
• Ujjwal, J., and R. Bandyopadhyaya. 2021a. “Development of Pedestrian Level of Service Assessment Guidelines for Mixed Land Use Areas considering Quality of Service Parameters.” Transportation in Developing Economies 7 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s40890-021-00113-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ujjwal, J., and R. Bandyopadhyaya. 2021b. “Development of Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS) Model and Satisfaction Perception Rating Models for Pedestrian Infrastructure for Mixed Land-use Urban Areas.” Transportation. doi:10.1007/s11116-021-10247-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ujjwal, J., V. Bandyopadhyaya, and R. Bandyopadhyaya. 2021. “Identifying Key Determinants for Parking Management to Reduce Road Traffic Congestion for Congested cities-A Structural Equation Modelling Approach.” Advances in Transportation Studies 54: 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Borda, J. A., V. Cantillo, and A. Rodriguez-Valencia. 2020. “A Perception-based Cognitive Map of the Pedestrian Perceived Quality of Service on Urban Sidewalks.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 73: 107–118. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and L. D. Han. 2002. “Pavement Distress Deduct-value Determination: A New Approach.” Road & Transport Research 11 (1): 22. https://www.academia.edu/1038461/Pavement_distress_deduct_value_determination_A_new_approach
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. K., and H. Li. 2008. “Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi-criteria Analysis of the Selection of Intelligent Building Systems.” Building and Environment 43 (1): 108–125. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., X. Wang, G. Sun, and Y. Li. 2019. “Modeling the Perception of Walking Environmental Quality in a Traffic-free Tourist Destination.” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 1–16. doi:10.1080/10548408.2019.1598534.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8 (3): 338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
   Google Scholar