Crowd model calibration at strategic, tactical, and operational levels: Full-spectrum sensitivity analyses show bottleneck parameters are most critical, followed by exit-choice-changing parameters

References

• Abdelghany, A., K. Abdelghany, H. Mahmassani, and W. Alhalabi. 2014. “Modeling Framework for Optimal Evacuation of Large-Scale Crowded Pedestrian Facilities.” European Journal of Operational Research 237 (3): 1105–1118. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonini, G., M. Bierlaire, and M. Weber. 2006. “Discrete Choice Models of Pedestrian Walking Behavior.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40 (8): 40. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano, M., T. Iryo, and M. Kuwahara. 2010. “Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model Combined with a Tactical Model for Route Choice Behaviour.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18 (6): 842–855. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandini, S., F. Rubagotti, G. Vizzari, and K. Shimura. 2011. “A Cellular Automata Based Model for Pedestrian and Group Dynamics: Motivations and First Experiments.” In Parallel Computing Technologies, edited by V. Malyshkin, 125–139. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berrou, J. L., J. Beecham, P. Quaglia, M. A. Kagarlis, and A. Gerodimos. 2007. “Calibration and validation of the Legion simulation model using empirical data.” In Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2005, 167–181. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, N. W. F., and E. A. Codling. 2013. “Human Exit Route Choice in Virtual Crowd Evacuations.” Animal Behaviour 86 (2): 347–358. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltes, M., and A. Seyfried. 2013. “Collecting Pedestrian Trajectories.” Neurocomputing 100: 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2012.01.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstedde, C., K. Klauck, A. Schadschneider, and J. Zittartz. 2001. “Simulation of Pedestrian Dynamics Using a Two-Dimensional Cellular Automaton.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 295 (3–4): 507–525. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00141-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepolina, E. M. 2009. “Phased Evacuation: An Optimisation Model Which Takes into Account the Capacity Drop Phenomenon in Pedestrian Flows.” Fire Safety Journal 44 (4): 532–544. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepolina, E. M., and A. Farina (2010). A Pedestrian Movement Model That Takes into Account the Capacity Drop Phenomenon in the Motion of Crowd. In Cellular Automata: 9th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry, ACRI 2010, Ascoli Piceno, Italy September 21-24. Cellular Automata: 9th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry, ACRI 2010 (pp. 446–454). Springer Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Chraibi, M., M. Freialdenhoven, A. Schadschneider, and A. Seyfried. 2013. “Modeling the Desired Direction in a Force-Based Model for Pedestrian Dynamics.” In Traffic and Granular Flow ’11, edited by V. V. Kozlov, A. P. Buslaev, A. S. Bugaev, M. V. Yashina, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, 263–275. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chraibi, M., U. Kemloh, A. Schadschneider, and A. Seyfried. 2011. “Force-Based Models of Pedestrian Dynamics.” Networks & Heterogeneous Media 6 (3): 425. doi:10.3934/nhm.2011.6.425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chraibi, M., A. Seyfried, and A. Schadschneider. 2010. “Generalized Centrifugal Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics.” Physical Review E 82 (4). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.046111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, A., A. Muntean, and K. Vafayi. 2015. “Parameter Estimation of Social Forces in Pedestrian Dynamics Models via a Probabilistic Method.” Mathematical Biosciences and engineering 12 (2): 337–356. doi:10.3934/mbe.2015.12.337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crociani, L., Y. Zeng, G. Vizzari, and S. Bandini. 2018. “Shape Matters: Modelling, Calibrating and Validating Pedestrian Movement Considering Groups.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 87: 73–91. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2018.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., and H. Shi. 2011. “A*-Based Pathfinding in Modern Computer Games.” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 11: 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Daamen, W., and S. Hoogendoorn. 2012a. “Calibration of Pedestrian Simulation Model for Emergency Doors by Pedestrian Type.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2316 (1): 69–75. doi:10.3141/2316-08.
   Google Scholar
• Daamen, W., and S. Hoogendoorn. 2012b. “Emergency Door Capacity: Influence of Door Width, Population Composition and Stress Level.” Fire Technology 48 (1): 55–71. doi:10.1007/s10694-010-0202-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, C., M. Iryo-Asano, H. Nishiuchi, and T. Todoroki. 2018. “Calibrating a Social Force Based Model for Simulating Personal Mobility Vehicles and Pedestrian Mixed Traffic.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 87: 395–411. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, C., and R. Lovreglio. 2018. “Calibrating Cellular Automaton Models for Pedestrians Walking Through Corners.” Physics Letters A 382 (19): 1255–1261. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2018.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirk, H. 2010. “Adaptive Pedestrian Dynamics Based on Geodesics.” New Journal of Physics 12 (4): 043032. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043032.
   Google Scholar
• Ezaki, T., D. Yanagisawa, and K. Nishinari. 2012. “Pedestrian Flow Through Multiple Bottlenecks.” Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 86 (2). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.86.026118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S., E. Frejinger, and M. Ben-Akiva. 2010. “Adaptive Route Choices in Risky Traffic Networks: A Prospect Theory Approach.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18 (5): 727–740. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoerg, P., J. Schumann, M. Boltes, and M. Kinateder. 2022. “How People with Disabilities Influence Crowd Dynamics of Pedestrian Movement Through Bottlenecks.” Scientific Reports 12 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18142-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoerg, P., J. Schumann, S. Holl, M. Boltes, and A. Hofmann. 2020. “The Influence of Individual Impairments in Crowd Dynamics.” Fire and Materials 45 (4): 529–542. n/a. doi:10.1002/fam.2789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoerg, P., J. Schumann, S. Holl, and A. Hofmann. 2019. “The Influence of Wheelchair Users on Movement in a Bottleneck and a Corridor.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 2019: 1–17. doi:10.1155/2019/9717208.
   Google Scholar
• Gödel, M., R. Fischer, and G. Köster. 2020. “Sensitivity Analysis for Microscopic Crowd Simulation.” Algorithms 13 (7): 162. doi:10.3390/a13070162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. 2007. NLOGIT: Version 4.0, User Manual. Econometric Software. New York. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, J., K. Wang, and F. Chen. 2016. “A Cellular Automaton Model for Evacuation Flow Using Game Theory.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 461: 655–661. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.05.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwynne, S., E. Galea, P. Lawrence, M. Owen, and L. Filippidis. 2000. “Adaptive Decision-Making in Building EXODUS in Response to Exit Congestion.” Fire Safety Science 6: 1041–1052. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.6-1041.
   Google Scholar
• Gwynne, S., E. R. Galea, M. Owen, P. J. Lawrence, and L. Filippidis. 2005. “A Systematic Comparison of buildingExodus Predictions with Experimental Data from the Stapelfeldt Trials and the Milburn House Evacuation.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 29 (9): 818–851. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2004.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwynne, S. M. V., and A. L. E. Hunt. 2018. “Why Model Evacuee Decision-Making?” Safety Science 110: 457–466. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwynne, S. M. V., E. D. Kuligowski, J. Kratchman, and J. A. Milke. 2009. “Questioning the Linear Relationship Between Doorway Width and Achievable Flow Rate.” Fire Safety Journal 44 (1): 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M. 2020a. “Empirical Methods in Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics: Part I. Experimental Methods and Emerging Topics.” Safety Science 129: 104743. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M. 2020b. “Empirical Methods in Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics: Part II. Field Methods and Controversial Topics.” Safety Science 129: 104760. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M. 2020c. “Optimising Crowd Evacuations: Mathematical, Architectural and Behavioural Approaches.” Safety Science 128: 104745. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M. 2021. “The Notion of Validity in Experimental Crowd Dynamics.” SSRN Electronic Journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10673. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3974364.
   Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2016a. “Human Exit Choice in Crowded Built Environments: Investigating Underlying Behavioural Differences Between Normal Egress and Emergency Evacuations.” Fire Safety Journal 85: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2016b. “Pedestrian Crowd Tactical-Level Decision Making During Emergency Evacuations.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 50 (8): 1870–1895. n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/atr.1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2017. “Stated and Revealed Exit Choices of Pedestrian Crowd Evacuees.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 95: 238–259. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2018a. “Crowd Behaviour and Motion: Empirical Methods.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 107: 253–294. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2018b. “Hypothetical Bias and Decision-Rule Effect in Modelling Discrete Directional Choices.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 116: 361–388. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2019a. “Herding’ in Direction Choice-Making During Collective Escape of Crowds: How Likely is It and What Moderates It?” Safety Science 115: 362–375. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2019b. “Laboratory Experimentation and Simulation of Discrete Direction Choices: Investigating Hypothetical Bias, Decision-Rule Effect and External Validity Based on Aggregate Prediction Measures.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 130: 134–157. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2019c. “Simulating Dynamics of Adaptive Exit-Choice Changing in Crowd Evacuations: Model Implementation and Behavioural Interpretations.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 103: 56–82. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., and M. Sarvi. 2019d. “Simulating Pedestrian Flow Through Narrow Exits.” Physics Letters A 383 (2–3): 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2018.10.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., M. Sarvi, and A. Rajabifard. 2018. “Simulating Indoor Evacuation of Pedestrians: The Sensitivity of Predictions to Directional-Choice Calibration Parameters.” Transportation Research Record 2672 (1): 171–182. doi:10.1177/0361198118796351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., M. Sarvi, and Z. Shahhoseini. 2015. “Accommodating Taste Heterogeneity and Desired Substitution Pattern in Exit Choices of Pedestrian Crowd Evacuees Using a Mixed Nested Logit Model.” Journal of Choice Modelling 16: 58–68. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2015.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., M. Sarvi, and Z. Shahhoseini. 2019. “When ‘Push’ Does Not Come to ‘Shove’: Revisiting ‘Faster is slower’ in Collective Egress of Human Crowds.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 122: 51–69. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., M. Sarvi, and Z. Shahhoseini. 2020. “Evacuation Behaviour of Crowds Under High and Low Levels of Urgency: Experiments of Reaction Time, Exit Choice and Exit-Choice Adaptation.” Safety Science 126: 104679. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghani, M., M. Sarvi, Z. Shahhoseini, M. Boltes, and J. Jing. 2016. “How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans’ Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies.” Plos One 11 (11): e0166908. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbing, D., I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek. 2000. “Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic.” Nature 407 (6803): 487–490. doi:10.1038/35035023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, Y., and R. Liu. 2008. “The Principles of Calibrating Traffic Microsimulation Models.” Transportation 35 (3): 347–362. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9156-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, S. P., and W. Daamen. 2005. “Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks.” Transportation Science 39 (2): 147–159. doi:10.1287/trsc.1040.0102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, S. P., F. L. M. van Wageningen-Kessels, W. Daamen, and D. C. Duives. 2014. “Continuum Modelling of Pedestrian Flows: From Microscopic Principles to Self-Organised Macroscopic Phenomena.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 416: 684–694. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.07.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A. M., I. Venkat, and P. De Wilde. 2019. “The Impact of Potential Crowd Behaviours on Emergency Evacuation: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 22 (1). doi:10.18564/jasss.3837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinateder, M., B. Comunale, and W. H. Warren. 2018. “Exit Choice in an Emergency Evacuation Scenario is Influenced by Exit Familiarity and Neighbor Behavior.” Safety Science 106: 170–175. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinateder, M., M. Müller, M. Jost, A. Mühlberger, and P. Pauli. 2014. “Social Influence in a Virtual Tunnel Fire – Influence of Conflicting Information on Evacuation Behavior.” Applied Ergonomics 45 (6): 1649–1659. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinateder, M., E. Ronchi, D. Gromer, M. Müller, M. Jost, M. Nehfischer, A. Mühlberger, and P. Pauli. 2014. “Social Influence on Route Choice in a Virtual Reality Tunnel Fire.” Transportation Research Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 26: 116–125. Part A. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, M., T. Kim, and K. Sohn. 2013. “Calibrating a Social-Force-Based Pedestrian Walking Model Based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation.” Transportation 40 (1): 91–107. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9411-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köster, G., and M. Gödel. 2015. “Implementation Issues of Force Based Pedestrian Motion Models.” In Traffic and Granular Flow ’13, edited by M. Chraibi, M. Boltes, A. Schadschneider, and A. Seyfried, 63–71, Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kretz, T., K. Lehmann, and I. Hofsäß. 2014. “User Equilibrium Route Assignment for Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation.” Advances in Complex Systems 17 (02): 17. doi:10.1142/S0219525914500106.
   Google Scholar
• Kretz, T., J. Lohmiller, and P. Sukennik. 2018. “Some Indications on How to Calibrate the Social Force Model of Pedestrian Dynamics.” Transportation Research Record 2672 (20): 228–238. doi:10.1177/0361198118786641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, W., A. Seyfried, J. Zhang, M. Boltes, X. Zheng, and Y. Zhao. 2014. “Experimental Study on Pedestrian Flow Through Wide Bottleneck.” Transportation Research Procedia 2: 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, W., A. U. K. Wagoum, and N. W. Bode. 2017. “Route Choice in Pedestrians: Determinants for Initial Choices and Revising Decisions.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 14 (127): 20160684. doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.0684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., Y. Zhao, L. He, W. Chen, and X. Xu. 2015. “The Parameter Calibration and Optimization of Social Force Model for the Real-Life 2013 Ya’an Earthquake Evacuation in China.” Safety Science 79: 243–253. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Carmona, M. A. 2022. “System Identification for the Design of Behavioral Controllers in Crowd Evacuations.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 144: 103913. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2022.103913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Carmona, M. A., and A. P. Garcia. 2021. “CellEvac: An Adaptive Guidance System for Crowd Evacuation Through Behavioral Optimization.” Safety Science 139: 105215. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovreglio, R., D. Borri, L. Dell’olio, and A. Ibeas. 2014. “A Discrete Choice Model Based on Random Utilities for Exit Choice in Emergency Evacuations.” Safety Science 62: 418–426. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovreglio, R., E. Ronchi, and D. Borri. 2014. “The Validation of Evacuation Simulation Models Through the Analysis of Behavioural Uncertainty.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 131: 166–174. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovreglio, R., E. Ronchi, and D. Nilsson. 2015. “Calibrating Floor Field Cellular Automaton Models for Pedestrian Dynamics by Using Likelihood Function Optimization.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 438: 308–320. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2015.06.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Ibrahim, A., I. Venkat, and P. D. Wilde. 2017. “Uncertainty in a Spatial Evacuation Model.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 479: 485–497. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussaïd, M., M. Kapadia, T. Thrash, R. W. Sumner, M. Gross, D. Helbing, and C. Hölscher. 2016. “Crowd Behaviour During High-Stress Evacuations in an Immersive Virtual Environment.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 13 (122): 20160414. doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.0414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, H. C., D. M. Bottomley, and C. Marrison. 1996. “Effects of Motivation and Cabin Configuration on Emergency Aircraft Evacuation Behavior and Rates of Egress.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 6 (1): 57–77. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0601_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolas, A., S. Bouzat, and M. N. Kuperman. 2017. “Pedestrian Flows Through a Narrow Doorway: Effect of Individual Behaviours on the Global Flow and Microscopic Dynamics.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 99: 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., and J. Schneeberger. 2003. “Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation: Case Study of VISSIM Simulation Model for a Coordinated Actuated Signal System.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1856 (1): 185–192. doi:10.3141/1856-20.
   Google Scholar
• Rahn, S., M. Gödel, R. Fischer, and G. Köster. 2021. “Dynamics of a Simulated Demonstration March: An Efficient Sensitivity Analysis.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3455. doi:10.3390/su13063455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, T., G. Antonini, M. Bierlaire, and J. Cruz. 2009. “Specification, Estimation and Validation of a Pedestrian Walking Behavior Model.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 43 (1): 36–56. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, A., M. Boltes, J. Kähler, W. Klingsch, A. Portz, T. Rupprecht, A. Schadschneider, B. Steffen, and A. Winkens. 2010. “Enhanced Empirical Data for the Fundamental Diagram and the Flow Through Bottlenecks.” In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, edited by W. W. F. Klingsch, C. Rogsch, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, 145–156. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfried, A., O. Passon, B. Steffen, M. Boltes, T. Rupprecht, and W. Klingsch. 2009. “New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks.” Transportation Science 43 (3): 395–406. doi:10.1287/trsc.1090.0263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipman, A., and A. Majumdar. 2018. “Fear in Humans: A Glimpse into the Crowd-Modeling Perspective.” Transportation Research Record 2672 (1): 0361198118787343. doi:10.1177/0361198118787343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teknomo, K. 2006. “Application of Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model.” Transportation Research Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 9 (1): 15–27. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, W., W. Song, J. Ma, Z. Fang, A. Seyfried, and J. Liddle. 2012. “Experimental Study of Pedestrian Behaviors in a Corridor Based on Digital Image Processing.” Fire Safety Journal 47: 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, K., G. Anna, and S. Michael. 2006. “Experimental Study of Pedestrian Flow Through a Bottleneck.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006 (10): 10014. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/10/P10014.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Z. Fu, Y. Li, and S. Qian. 2020. “Influence of Human-Obstacle Interaction on Evacuation from Classrooms.” Automation in Construction 116: 103234. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., X. Shi, A. P. Xuan Goh, and S. Qian. 2019. “A Machine Learning Based Study on Pedestrian Movement Dynamics Under Emergency Evacuation.” Fire Safety Journal 106: 163–176. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werberich, B. R., C. O. Pretto, and H. B. B. Cybis. 2015a. “Calibration of a Pedestrian Route Choice Model with a Basis in Friction Forces.” Transportation Research Record 2519 (1): 137–145. doi:10.3141/2519-15.
   Google Scholar
• Werberich, B. R., C. O. Pretto, and H. B. B. Cybis. 2015b. “Calibration of a Pedestrian Route Choice Model with a Basis in Friction Forces.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2519 (1): 137–145. doi:10.3141/2519-15.
   Google Scholar
• Wolinski, D., J. G. S, A. H. Olivier, M. Lin, D. Manocha, and J. Pettré. 2014. “Parameter Estimation and Comparative Evaluation of Crowd Simulations.” Computer Graphics Forum 33 (2): 303–312. doi:10.1111/cgf.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., M. Chraibi, and A. Seyfried. 2021. “Prolonged Clogs in Bottleneck Simulations for Pedestrian Dynamics.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 573: 125934. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.125934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, D., A. Kimura, R. Nishi, A. Tomoeda, and K. Nishinari. 2009. Theoretical and Empirical Study of Pedestrian Outflow Through an Exit, Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 8, 227–238. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, D., and K. Nishinari. 2007. “Mean-Field Theory for Pedestrian Outflow Through an Exit.” Physical Review E 76 (6): 061117. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.061117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, W., P. Chen, H. Nakamura, and M. Iryo-Asano. 2014. “Application of Social Force Model to Pedestrian Behavior Analysis at Signalized Crosswalk.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 40: 143–159. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, W., P. Chen, G. Yu, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Specification and Calibration of a Microscopic Model for Pedestrian Dynamic Simulation at Signalized Intersections: A Hybrid Approach.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 80: 37–70. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., H. Zhu, L. Du, and S. Hostikka. 2018. “An Optimization-Based Overtaking Model for Unidirectional Pedestrian Flow.” Physics Letters A 382 (44): 3172–3180. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2018.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., H. Zhu, S. Hostikka, and S. Qiu. 2019. “Pedestrian Dynamics in a Heterogeneous Bidirectional Flow: Overtaking Behaviour and Lane Formation.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 525: 72–84. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, J., and W. Cai. 2015. “Differential Evolution with Sensitivity Analysis and the Powell’s Method for Crowd Model Calibration.” Journal of Computational Science 9: 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2015.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z. -X., W. Nakanishi, and Y. Asakura. 2021a. “Data-Driven Framework for the Adaptive Exit Selection Problem in Pedestrian Flow: Visual Information Based Heuristics Approach.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 583: 126289. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z. -X., W. Nakanishi, and Y. Asakura. 2021b. “Route Choice in the Pedestrian Evacuation: Microscopic Formulation Based on Visual Information.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 562: 125313. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.125313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar