The synergy of topoi and socio-cognition in ideology construction and identity reformation: war on terror discourse

References

• Abdel Ghafar, A. (2018). A stable Egypt for a stable region: Socio-economic challenges and prospects. European Parliament’s Online Database, ‘Think Tank’. doi: 10.2861/262760
   Google Scholar
• Blaxter, L., Tight, M., & Hughes, C. (2010). How to research (1st ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw- Hill International (UK) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bogain, A. (2017). Security in the name of human rights: The discursive legitimation strategies of the war on terror in France. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(3), 476–500. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2017.1311093
   Google Scholar
• Bogain, A. (2019). Terrorism and the discursive construction of national identity in France. National Identities, 21(3), 241–265. doi: 10.1080/14608944.2018.1431877
   Google Scholar
• Chin-Kuei, T. S. U. I. (2014, March). Rethinking the discursive construction of terrorism and counterterrorism: What we can (and cannot) learn from discourse. Presented at International Studies Association (ISA) 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, 2014, Canada: ISA.
   Google Scholar
• Dunmire, P. (2007). ‘Emerging threats’ and ‘coming dangers’: Claiming the future for preventive. In A. Hodges & C. Nilep (Eds.), Discourse, war and terrorism (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Egypt police disperse anti-military secular protest in Cairo. (2014, August 31). Middle East Monitor. Retrieved from https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20140831-egypt-police-disperse-anti-military-secular-protest-in-cairo/
   Google Scholar
• Egyptian Ministry of Defence. (2018). Sinai counterterrorism comprehensive operation statements. (Arabic version accessed starting 9th February, 2018, 10:00 pm and English version accessed: 11th November, 2018, 8:00 am). Retrieved from http://www.mod.gov.eg/ModWebSite /
   Google Scholar
• Elhadad, E. (2012). The Egyptian military’s role in the 25 January revolution, and the post-revolution impacts on Egypt’s foreign relations and Middle East stability (Unpublished master’s thesis). U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS. Retrieved from https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a569347.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2004). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis e-Library).
   Google Scholar
• Fog, A. (2002). Why terrorism doesn’t work (Draft Article). Retrieved from https://www.agner.org/cultsel/terror.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002). Truth and power (R. Hurely, Trans.). In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault ( Vol. 3, pp. 111–133). London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. (2008). The science of fear: How the culture of fear manipulates your brain. New York: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harb, I. (2003). The Egyptian military in politics: Disengagement or accommodation? Middle East Journal, 57(2), 269–290.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, A. (2011). The ‘war on terror’ narrative: Discourse and intertextuality in the construction and contestation of sociopolitical reality. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, A., & Nilep, C. (2007). Discourse, war and terrorism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, A. (2009). Cultural relativism. EBSCO Research Starters: Academic Topic Overviews, 1(5), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, Y. (2019, April 24). Egypt seeks a new role in the greater Middle East. International Policy Digest. Retrieved from https://intpolicydigest.org/2019/04/24/egypt-seeks-a-new-role-in-the-greater-middle-east/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2005a). Writing the war on terrorism. Oxford: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2005b). Security, democracy, and the rhetoric of counter-terrorism. Democracy and Security, 1(2), 147–171. doi: 10.1080/17419160500322517
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., Smyth, M. B., Gunning, J., & Jarvis, L. (2011). Terrorism: A critical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. (2009). Times of terror: Discourse, temporality and the war on terror. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kienpointner, M. (1992). Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentations-mustern. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, A., & Lazar, M. M. (2004). The discourse of the new world order:’Out-casting’the double face of threat. Discourse & Society, 15(2-3), 223–242. doi: 10.1177/0957926504041018
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, R. L. (2018, February 15). How to think about terrorism: An act of desperation rather than real power. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/anxiety-files/201802/
   Google Scholar
• Marr, P. ( Ed.). (1999). Egypt at the crossroads: Domestic stability and regional role. Washington, DC: National Defense University. (253 pages).
   Google Scholar
• Nimmer, L. (2011). De-contextualization in the terrorism discourse: A social constructionist view. ENDC Proceedings, 14, 223–240. Retrieved from http://www.ksk.edu.ee/toimedised
   Google Scholar
• Noor, F. A. (2010). Terror and the politics of containment: Analysing the discourse of the ‘war on terror’ and its workings of power. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 8(2), Article 7.
   Google Scholar
• Nordquist, R. (2018, March 17). Definition and examples of the topoi in rhetoric. Thoughtco. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/topoi-rhetoric-1692553
   Google Scholar
• Pallardy, R. ( Ed). (2016, June 1). List of presidents of Egypt. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-presidents-of-Egypt-2067026
   Google Scholar
• Philips, S. (2004). Language and social inequality. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 474–495). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Population Council. (2010, December). Survey of young people in Egypt. Egypt: Population Council Media Centre. Retrieved from http//:www.Popcouncil.org/projects/234surveyyoungpeopleegypt.asp
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach. A methodological framework. In C. Hart & C. Piotr (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M. (2017). The discourse-historical approach. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Abingdon: Routledge. Retrieved from Routledge Handbooks Online.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. Rhetoric of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. E. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). ( Introducing Qualitative Methods). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rybina, A. (2014). A critical discourse analysis of the representation of migrants in Russian press (Master’s thesis). Örebro University, Field of Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S. (2018, June 3). Egypt inaugurates new counter-terrorism command center in Sinai. Israel Defense. Retrieved from https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/33307
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M. H. (1991). Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, A. (2012). The social construction of terrorism: Media, metaphors and policy implications. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15(3), 393–419. doi: 10.1057/jird.2012.4
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (2002). Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), 215–244. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.7.2.04stu
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trckova, D. (2016). Representations of nature in ecotourism advertisements. Discourse and Interaction, 9, 79–94. doi: 10.5817/DI2016-1-79
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Cognitive situation models in discourse production: The expression of ethnic situations in prejudiced discourse. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 61–79). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary introduction. New York: Sage Books. Retrieved from http://www.discourses.org/OldBooks/Teun
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse (2nd ed.). Barcelona: PompeuFabra University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures of Aznar’s legitimization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 65–92. doi:10.1075/bct.3.05dij doi: 10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse-cognition-society: Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary studies in critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–146). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001005
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. (2008). Military terminology and the English language. p.5. Retrieved from http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cpercy/courses/6362-WilsonAdele.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179–190. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059566
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and discourse analysis. In J. Zienkowski, J. O. Ostman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Discursive pragmatics (pp. 50–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2015). Argumentation, political. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), International encyclopedia of political communication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi: 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc080
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Chilton, P. (2005). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. S.L.: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2008). Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences. S.L.: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2016a). Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory, methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 1–22, Introducing Qualitative Methods). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. ( Eds.). (2016b). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Žagar, I. Ž. (2010). Topoi in critical discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27. doi: 10.2478/v10016-010-0002-1
   Google Scholar
• Zelditch, M. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 33–53). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar