Pathways to violence: do uncertainty and dark world perceptions increase intentions to engage in political violence?

References

• Abdeen, Z., Brunstein-Klomek, A., Nakash, O., Shibli, N., Nagar, M., Agha, H., … Qasrawi, R. (2018). The association between political violence and the connection between bullying and suicidality among Palestinian youth. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 48, 95–104. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12338
   Google Scholar
• Atran, S. (2016). The devoted actor: Unconditional commitment and intractable conflict across cultures. Current Anthropology, 57, S192–S203. doi: 10.1086/685495
   Google Scholar
• Baez, S., Herrera, E., García, A. M., Manes, F., Young, L., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Outcome-oriented moral evaluation in terrorists. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0118. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0118
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. (2014). Police and protester dialog: Safeguarding the peace or ritualistic sham? International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 38, 83–104. doi: 10.1080/01924036.2013.819024
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R. (2014). Psychological vulnerabilities and propensities for involvement in violent extremism. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32, 286–305. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2110
   Google Scholar
• Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychology, 38, 551–569. doi: 10.1111/pops.12337
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, K., & Horgan, J. (2016). Towards a guide for constructing and disseminating counternarratives to reduce support for terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39, 381–404. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1116277
   Google Scholar
• Brandstätter, H., & Opp, K. D. (2014). Personality traits (“Big Five”) and the propensity to political protest: Alternative models. Political Psychology, 35, 515–537. doi: 10.1111/pops.12043
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. doi: 10.1037/a0018933
   Google Scholar
• Carmignani, F. (2003). Political instability, uncertainty and economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17, 1–54. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00187
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Tarrow, S. (1986). Unwanted children: Political violence and the cycle of protest in Italy, 1966–1973. European Journal of Political Research, 14, 607–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1986.tb00852.x
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Loseman, A., & Van Den Bos, K. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 586–604. doi: 10.1111/josi.12030
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2013). A millennial challenge: Extremism in uncertain times. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 605–613. doi: 10.1111/josi.12031
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36, 412–427. doi: 10.2307/2093082
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, L., & Hogg, M. A. (2016). Going to extremes for one’s group: The role of prototypicality and group acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 544–553. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12382
   Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2018). The time for causal designs: Review and evaluation of empirical support for mechanisms of political radicalization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2019). Personality moderates the relationship between uncertainty and political violence: Evidence from two large US samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 338–342. doi: 10.1177/0963721414540168
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., & Brewer, M. B. (2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 570–581. doi: 10.1177/1368430217690909
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Adelman, J. (2013). Uncertainty–identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 436–454. doi: 10.1111/josi.12023
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Kruglanski, A., & Van den Bos, K. (2013). Uncertainty and the roots of extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 407–418. doi: 10.1111/josi.12021
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the xenophobic populist parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15, 443–454. doi: 10.1017/S1537592717000111
   Google Scholar
• Jasko, K., LaFree, G., & Kruglanski, A. (2017). Quest for significance and violent extremism: The case of domestic radicalization. Political Psychology, 38, 815–831. doi: 10.1111/pops.12376
   Google Scholar
• Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N. (2017). When the appeal of a dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 6734–6739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711468114
   Google Scholar
• Kalmoe, N. P. (2014). Fueling the fire: Violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Political Communication, 31, 545–563. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.852642
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, J. R., Boos, B., Kimel, S. Y., Obaidi, M., Shani, M., & Thomsen, L. (2018). Engaging in extreme activism in support of others’ political struggles: The role of politically motivated fusion with out-groups. PloS one, 13, e0190639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190639
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. X. (2016). Causes and cures VI: The political science and economics of violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 28, 103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Littman, R., & Paluck, E. L. (2015). The cycle of violence: Understanding individual participation in collective violence. Political Psychology, 36, 79–99. doi: 10.1111/pops.12239
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 529–542. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710001234
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72, 205–216. doi: 10.1037/amp0000062
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, I., Hayes, J., & Prentice, M. (2015). Motivation for aggressive religious radicalization: goal regulation theory and a personality × threat × affordance hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01325
   Google Scholar
• Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21, 239–260. doi: 10.1080/09546550902765508
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E. N. (1985). Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and political violence. American Sociological Review, 50, 47–61. doi: 10.2307/2095339
   Google Scholar
• Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2018). The mistreatment of my people: Victimization by proxy and behavioral intentions to commit violence among Muslims in Denmark. Political psychology, 39(3), 577–593. doi: 10.1111/pops.12435
   Google Scholar
• Perry, R., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(1), 116–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Partisanship and political animosity in 2016. http://www.people-press.org/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Rast, D. E. I. I. I., Hogg, M. A., & Giessner, S. R. (2013). Self-uncertainty and support for autocratic leadership. Self and Identity, 12, 635–649. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2012.718864
   Google Scholar
• Scarcella, A., Page, R., & Furtado, V. (2016). Terrorism, radicalisation, extremism, authoritarianism and fundamentalism: A systematic review of the quality and psychometric properties of assessments. PloS one, 11, e0166947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166947
   Google Scholar
• Shadmehr, M. (2014). Mobilization, repression, and revolution: Grievances and opportunities in contentious politics. The Journal of Politics, 76, 621–635. doi: 10.1017/S0022381614000267
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five-month period. Political Psychology, 28(3), 357–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00572.x
   Google Scholar
• Smits, D. J., & Kuppens, P. (2005). The relations between anger, coping with anger, and aggression, and the BIS/BAS system. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 783–793. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.023
   Google Scholar
• Stankov, L. (2018). Psychological processes common to social conservatism and terrorism. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.029
   Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., Saucier, G., & Knežević, G. (2010). Militant extremist mind-set: Proviolence, vile world, and divine power. Psychological Assessment, 22, 70–86. doi: 10.1037/a0016925
   Google Scholar
• Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C. H., & Richardson, W. K. (2004). Trust in government-related institutions and political engagement among adolescents in six countries. Acta Politica, 39, 380–406. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500080
   Google Scholar
• Wagoner, J. A., Belavadi, S., & Jung, J. (2017). Social identity uncertainty: Conceptualization, measurement, and construct validity. Self and Identity, 16, 505–530. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1275762
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. Y., Dixon, W. J., Muller, E. N., & Seligson, M. A. (1993). Inequality and political violence revisited. American Political Science Review, 87, 979–993. doi: 10.2307/2938829
   Google Scholar
• Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
   Google Scholar
• Webber, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). The social psychological makings of a terrorist. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 131–134. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.024
   Google Scholar
• Weede, E. (2004). On political violence and its avoidance. Acta Politica, 39, 152–178. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500059
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 214–239.
   Google Scholar
• Zeineddine, F. B., & Pratto, F. (2017). The need for power and the power of need: An ecological approach for political psychology. Political Psychology, 38, 3–35. doi: 10.1111/pops.12389
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 706–724. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn054
   Google Scholar