3,299
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing

, &
Pages 1-16 | Received 26 Sep 2012, Accepted 13 Dec 2012, Published online: 28 Jan 2013

References

  • Barrett , S. 2008 . The incredible economics of geoengineering . Environ Resour Econ. , 39 : 29 – 44 .
  • Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM. 2012. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Clim Change. 3:597–615
  • Boyd , PW. 2008 . Ranking geo-engineering schemes . Nat Geosci. , 1 : 722 – 724 .
  • Boyd , PW. 2009 . Geopolitics of geoengineering . Nat Geosci. , 2 : 812
  • Boykoff , MT and Boykoff , JM. 2007 . Climate change and journalistic norms: a case-study of US mass-media coverage . Geoforum. , 38 ( 6 ) : 1190 – 1204 .
  • Buck , H. forthcoming . “ Climate engineering: spectacle, tragedy, or solution? A content analysis of news media framing ” . In (De-)constructing the greenhouse: interpretive approaches to global climate governance , Edited by: Methmann , C , Rothe , D, and Stephan , M . Routledge : London .
  • Bunzl , M. 2009 . Researching geoengineering: should not or could not? . Environ Res Lett. , 4 ( 045104 ) doi:10.1088/1748-9326/1084/1084/045104
  • Corbett , JB and Durfee , JL. 2004 . Testing public (un)certainty of science: media representation of global warming . Sci Commun. , 26 ( 2 ) : 129 – 151 .
  • Corner , A and Pidgeon , N . 2010 . Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications . Environ Sci Policy Sus Dev Psychol. , 52 ( 1 ) : 24 – 37 .
  • Corner , A , Pidgeon , N and Parkhill , K. 2012 . Perceptions of geoengineering: public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of “upstream” engagement . WIREs Clim Change , 3(5):451–466
  • Crawley , CE. 2007 . Localized debates of agricultural biotechnology in community newspapers: a quantitative content analysis of media frames and sources . Sci Commun. , 28 ( 3 ) : 314 – 346 .
  • Cressey , D. 2012 . Geoengineering experiment cancelled amid patent row . Nature , doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10645
  • Davies , G. 2011 . Framing the social, political, and environmental risks and benefits of geoengineering: balancing the hard-to-imagine against the hard-to-measure . Tulsa Law Rev. , 46 : 261 – 282 .
  • de Vreese , CH. 2005 . News framing: theory and typology . Inf Des J. , 13 : 51 – 62 .
  • Gamson , W and Modigliani , A. 1989 . Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach . Am J Sociol. , 95 : 1 – 37 .
  • Höijer , B , Lidskog , R and Thornberg , L. 2006 . News media and food scares: the case of contaminated salmon . Environ Sci. , 3 ( 4 ) : 273 – 288 .
  • Hulme , M. 2009 . Why we disagree about climate change. Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Kiehl , JT. 2006 . Geoengineering climate change: treating the symptom over the cause? . Climatic Change. , 77 : 227 – 228 .
  • Krütli , P , Flüeler , T , Stauffacher , M , Wiek , A and Scholz , RW. 2010 . Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland) . J Integr Environ Sci , 7 ( 3 ) : 229 – 244 .
  • Latham , J , Rasch , P , Chen , CC , Kettles , L , Gadian , A , Gettelman , A , Morrison , H , Bower , K and Choularton , T. 2008 . Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds . Philos Trans R Soc. , 366 : 3969 – 3987 .
  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N, Dawson E. 2010. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1633932 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=1633932)
  • Levitt , SD and Dubner , S. 2009 . SuperFreakonomics: global cooling, patriotic prostitutes, and why suicide bombers should buy life insurance , Chicago : University of Chicago .
  • Linsky , M. 1986 . Impact: how the press affects federal policymaking , New York : W.W. Norton .
  • Lyytimäki , JM. 2007 . Temporalities and environmental reporting: press news on eutrophication in Finland . Environ Sci. , 4 ( 1 ) : 41 – 51 .
  • Maibach , E , Leiserowitz , A , Cobb , S , Shank , M , Cobb , KM and Gulledge , J. 2012 . The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy? . Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. , 3 ( 3 ) : 289 – 295 .
  • Matthes , J and Kohring , M. 2008 . The content analysis of media frames: toward improving reliability and validity . J Commun. , 58 : 258 – 279 .
  • Nerlich , B and Jaspal , R. 2012 . Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors and the argument from catastrophy . Metaphor Sym. , 27 : 131 – 147 .
  • Nisbet , MC. 2009 . “ Framing science: a new paradigm in public engagement ” . In Understanding science: new agendas in science communication , Edited by: Kahlor , L and Stout , PA, . 40 – 67 . New York : Taylor & Francis .
  • Nisbet , MC , Brossard , D and Kroepsch , A. 2003 . Framing science: the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics . Press/Politics. , 8 : 36 – 70 .
  • Nisbet , MC and Lewenstein , BV. 2002 . Biotechnology and the American media: the policy press and the elite press, 1970 to 1999 . Sci Commun. , 23 : 359 – 391 .
  • Olausson , U. 2009 . Global warming – global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty . Public Underst Sci. , 18 : 421 – 436 .
  • Peters , H , Brossard , D , de Cheveigne , S , Dunwoody , S , Kallfass , M , Miller , S and Tsjuchida , S. 2008 . Science – media interface: it's time to reconsider . Sci Commun. , 30 : 266 – 276 .
  • Preston , CJ. 2011 . Re-thinking the unthinkable: environmental ethics and the presumptive argument against geoengineering . Environ Values. , 20 : 457 – 479 .
  • Robock , A. 2008 . 20 reasons why geoengineering might be a bad idea . Bull Atom Sci. , 64 : 14 – 18 .
  • Robock , A , Bunzl , M , Kravitz , B and Stenchikov , GL. 2010 . A test for geoengineering? . Science , 327 : 530 – 531 .
  • Scheufele , D . 1999 . Framing as theory of media effects . J Commun. , 49 : 103 – 122 .
  • Scheufele , D and Lewenstein , B. 2005 . The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies . J Nanoparticle Res. , 7 : 659 – 667 .
  • Shepherd , J , Caldeira , K , Haigh , J , Keith , D , Launder , B , Mace , G , MacKerron , G , Pyle , J , Rayner , S Redgwell , C . 2009 . Geoengineering the climate – science, governance and uncertainty London: The Royal Society
  • Stirling , A. 2007 . A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society . J R Soc Interface. , 4 : 707 – 719 .
  • Stirling , A. 2008 . “Opening up” and “closing down”: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology . Sci, Technol Hum Values. , 33 ( 2 ) : 262 – 294 .
  • Strauss , H. 2010 . Involving the Finnish public in nuclear facility licensing: participatory democracy and industrial bias . J Integr Environ Sci , 7 ( 3 ) : 211 – 228 .
  • Trumbo , C. 1996 . Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue . Public Underst Sci. , 5 : 269 – 283 .
  • Vasileiadou , E , Heimeriks , G and Petersen , AC. 2011 . Exploring the impact of IPCC assessment reports on science . Environ Sci Policy. , 14 ( 8 ) : 1052 – 1061 .
  • Virgoe , J. 2009 . International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change . Climatic Change. , 95 : 103 – 119 .
  • Weingart , P. 1998 . Science and the media . Res Policy. , 27 : 869 – 879 .