A framework development to evaluate the needs of SMEs in order to adopt a sustainability-balanced scorecard

REFERENCES

• Angel de BrioJ, JunqueraB. 2003. A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies. Technovation. 23:939–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AzzoneG, BertelèU, NociG. 1997. At last we are creating environmental strategies which work. Long Range Plan.30(4):478–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AzzoneG, BianichiR, MauriR, NociG. 1997. Deining operating environmental strategies: programmes and plans within Italian industries. Environ Manage Health.8(1):4–19.
   Google Scholar
• BernroiderE. 2002. Factors in SWOT analysis applied to micro, small-to-medium, and large sofware entreprises: an Austrian study. Eur Manage J.20(5):562–573.
   Google Scholar
• BiekerT. 2003. Sustainability management with the balanced scorecard. International Summer Academy on Technology Studies – Corporate Sustainability; Institute for Economy and the Environment at the University of St. Gallen.
   Google Scholar
• BraamGJM, NijssenEJ. 2004. Performance effects of using the balanced scorecard: a note on the Dutch experience. Long Range Plan.37(4):335–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurkeS, GaughranWF. 2007. Developing a framework for sustainability management in engineering SMEs. Robot Comput Integr Manuf.23(6):696–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CastkaP, BalzarovaMA, BamberCJ, SharpJM. 2004. How can SMEs, effectively implement the CSR agenda? A UK case study perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage.11:140–149.
   Google Scholar
• CoşkunA, TurkerO. 2011. Analysis of environmental impact assessment (EIA) system in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess.175(1):213–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del BríoJÁ, JunqueraB. 2003. A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies. Technovation.23(12):939–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias-SardinhaI, ReijndersL. 2005. Evaluating environmental and social performance of large Portuguese companies: a balanced scorecard approach. Bus Strat Environ.14(2):73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Dias-SardinhaI, ReijndersL, AntunesP. 2002. From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards. Environ Qual Manage.12(2):51–64.
   Google Scholar
• EpsteinMJ, WisnerPS. 2001. Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environ Qual Manage.11(2):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• FiggeF, HahnT, SchalteggerS, WagnerM. 2002. The sustainability balanced scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus Strat Environ.11(5):269–284.
   Google Scholar
• GenelettiD, BagliS, NapolitanoP, PistocchiA. 2007. Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans. A case study in southern Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev.27(5):408–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HelmsMM, NixonJ. 2010. Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. J Strat Manage.3(3):215–251.
   Google Scholar
• HillaryR.2004. Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod.12(6):561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockerts K. 2001. Sustainability at the millenium: globalization, competitiveness and the public trust. Proceedings of Greening of Industry Network, Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• HsuY-L, LiuC-C. 2010. Environmental performance evaluation and strategy management using balanced scorecard. Environ Monit Assess.170(1):599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubbardG. 2009. Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Bus Strat Environ.18(3):177–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IpYK, KooLC. 2004. BSQ strategic formulation framework: a hybrid of balanced scorecard, SWOT analysis and quality function deployment. Manage Auditing J.19(4):533–543.
   Google Scholar
• JohnsonSD. 1998. Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators: application of the balanced scorecard approach. Corp Environ Strat. 5(4):34–41.
   Google Scholar
• KaplanRS, NortonDP. 1992. The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev. Jan–Feb:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaplanRS, NortonDP. 1996. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• KooLC, KooH, LukL. 2008. A pragmatic and holistic approach to strategic formulation through adopting balanced scorecard, SWOT analysis and blue ocean strategy andndash – a case study of a consumer product manufacturer in China. Int J Manage Financ Account.1(2):127–146.
   Google Scholar
• LänsiluotoA, JärvenpääM. 2008. Environmental and performance management forces: integrating greenness into balanced scorecard. Qual Res Account Manage.5(3):184–206.
   Google Scholar
• LänsiluotoA, JärvenpääM. 2010. Greening the balanced scorecard. Bus Horiz.53(4):385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaurinkevičiūtėA, KinderytėL, StasiškienėŽ. 2008. Corporate decision-making in furniture industry: weight of EMA and sustainability balanced scorecard. Environ Res Eng Manage.43(1):69–79.
   Google Scholar
• LeeS-Y, KlassenRD. 2008. Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small-and-medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Prod Oper Manage.17(6):573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeSF, LoKK, LeungRF, Sai On KoA. 2000. Strategy formulation framework for vocational education: integrating SWOT analysis, balanced scorecard, QFD methodology and MBNQA education criteria. Manage Auditing J. 15(8):407–423.
   Google Scholar
• LeeSF, Sai On KoA. 2000. Building balanced scorecard with SWOT analysis, and implementing “Sun Tzu's The Art of Business Management Strategies” on QFD methodology. Account Finance.15(1/2):68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Leon-SorianoR, Muñoz-TorresMJ, Chalmeta-RosaleñR. 2010. Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management. Ind Manage Data Syst.110(2):249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LovePED, IraniZ. 2004. An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry. Inf Manage.42:227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LozanoM, VallésJ. 2007. An analysis of the implementation of an environmental management system in a local public administration. J Environ Manage.82(4):495–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManteghiN, ZohrabiA. 2011. A proposed comprehensive framework for formulating strategy: a hybrid of balanced scorecard, SWOT analysis, porter's generic strategies and fuzzy quality function deployment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci.15:2068–2073.
   Google Scholar
• MarkovskaN, TaseskaV, Pop-JordanovJ. 2009. SWOT analyses of the national energy sector for sustainable energy development. Energy. 34(6):752–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeiverC, GadenneD. 2005. Environmental management systems in small and medium businesses. Int Small Bus J.23(5):513–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MöllerA, SchalteggerS. 2005. The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis. J Ind Ecol.9(4):73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NikolaouIE, EvangelinosKI. 2010. A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek mining and mineral industry. Res Pol.35(3):226–234.
   Google Scholar
• NikolaouIE, IerapetritisD, TsagarakisKP. 2011. An evaluation of the prospects of green entrepreneurship development using a SWOT analysis. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 18(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NikolaouIE, TsalisTA. 2013. Development of a sustainable balanced scorecard framework. Ecol Indic.34:76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanayiotouN, AravossisK, MoschouP. 2009. A new methodology approach for measuring corporate social responsibility performance. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus.9(1):129–138.
   Google Scholar
• PapalexandrisA, IoannouG, PrastacosGP. 2004. Implementing the balanced scorecard in Greece: a software firm's experience. Long Range Plan.37(4):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-SanchezD, BartonJR, BowerD. 2003. Implementing environmental management in SMEs. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage.10(2):67–77.
   Google Scholar
• PetersM, TurnerRK. 2004. SME environmental attitudes and participation in local-scale voluntary initiatives: some practical applications. J Environ Plan Manage.47(3):449–473.
   Google Scholar
• PorterEM, van der LindeC. 1995. Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect.9(4):97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuaziHA. 1999. Implementation of an environmental management system: the experience of companies operating in Singapore. Ind Manage Data Syst.99(7):302–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaltegger S, Wagner M. 2006. Managing sustainability performance measurement and reporting in an integrated manner. In: Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Burritt R, editors. Sustainability accounting as the link between the sustainability balanced scorecard and sustainability reporting sustainability accounting and reporting. Netherlands: Springer. p. 681–697.
   Google Scholar
• SeidelM, SeidelR, EdfordD, CrossR, WaitL, HammerleE. 2009. Overcoming barriers to implementing environmentally benign manufacturing practices: strategic tools for SMEs. Environ Qual Manage. 18(3):37–55.
   Google Scholar
• ShawS, GrantBD, MonganJ. 2010. Developing environmental supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking Inter J.17(3):320–339.
   Google Scholar
• ShiH, PengSZ, LiuY, ZhongP. 2008. Barriers to the implementation of cleaner production in Chinese SMEs: government, industry and expert stakeholders perspectives. J Clean Prod.16(7):842–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SidiropoulosM, MouzakitisY, AdamidesE, GoutsosS. 2004. Applying sustainable indicators to corporate strategy: the eco-balanced scorecard. Environ Res Eng Manage.1(27):28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Sigma Project. 2003. The Sigma Sustainability Scorecard. The Sigma Guideline -Toolkit. London: Sigma Project.
   Google Scholar
• SrivastavaPK, KulshreshthaK, MohantyCS, PushpangadanP, SinghA. 2005. Stakeholder-based SWOT analysis for successful municipal solid waste management in Lucknow, India. Waste Manage.25(5):531–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TerradosJ, AlmonacidG, HontoriaL. 2007. Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools: impact on renewables development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.11:1275–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ToksoyD, YenigümM, SenG. 2009. Assessment of agricultural development cooperatives in forest villages by using SWOT analysis (a case study of Maçka), Kastamonu University. J Fac For.9(1):12–18.
   Google Scholar
• TsaiW-H, ChouW-C. 2009. Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Exp Syst Appl.36(2, Part 1):1444–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der WoerdF, van den BrinkT. 2004. Feasibility of a responsive business scorecard – a pilot study. J Bus Ethics.55(2):173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van HemelC, CramerJ. 2002. Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. J Clean Prod.10(5):439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsSJ. 2006. Managing and developing suppliers: can SCM be adopted by SMES?Int J Prod Res.44(18–19):3831–3846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YongvanichK, GuthrieJ. 2006. An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting. Bus Strat Environ.15(5):309–321.
   Google Scholar