Transdisciplinarity in practice: aims, collaboration and integration in a Swedish research programme

References

• BradshawRHW. 2010. Start-up review of Mistra Future Forests. Stockholm: MISTRA.
   Google Scholar
• BrewerGD. 1999a. The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Pol Sci. 32:327–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrewerGD. 1999b. Reflections. Pol Sci. 32:421–429.
   Google Scholar
• BrotoVC, GislasonM, EhlersMH. 2009. Practicing interdisciplinarity in the interplay between disciplines: experiences of established researchers. Environ Sci Pol. 12:922–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuanesA, JentoftS. 2009. Building bridges: institutional perspectives on interdisciplinarity. Futures. 41:446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CornellS, BerkhoutF, TuinstraW, TàbaraD, JägerJ, ChabayI, de WitB, LanglaisR, MillsD, MollP, et al. 2013. Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environ Sci Pol. 28:60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de BoerY, de GierA, VershuurM, de WitB. 2006. Building bridges: Researchers on their experiences with interdisciplinary research in the Netherlands. The Hague: RMNO, KNAW, NWO, COS.
   Google Scholar
• ElzingaA. 2008. Participation. In: Hirsch HadornG, Hoffman-RiemH, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, DominiqueJ, PohlC, WiesmanU, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 345–359.
   Google Scholar
• FrodemanR, Thompson KleinJ, MitchamC, editors. 2010. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Future Forests. 2009. Future Forests: sustainable strategies under uncertainty and risk: program plan 2009. Umeå: Future Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Future Forests. 2011. About Future Forests. Available from: http://www.futureforests.se/program/futureforests/home/aboutfutureforests.4.6b38234911d6cedb125800028097.html (accessed 18 November).
   Google Scholar
• GierynT. 1983. Boundary work in professional ideology of scientists. Am Sociol Rev. 48:781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisF, LyonF. 2013. Transdisciplinary environmental research: building trust across professional cultures. Environ Sci Pol. 31:109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HastrupK. 1987. Fieldwork among friends: ethnographic exchange within the Northern civilisation. In: JacksonA, editor. Anthropology at home. ASA Monographs 25. London: Tavistock Publications; p. 94–109.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard JakobsenC, HelsT, McLaughlinWJ. 2004. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. Forest Pol Econ. 6:15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch HadornG, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, Hoffman-RiemH, DominiqueJ, PohlC, WiesmanU, ZempE. 2008. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In: Hirsch HadornG, Hoffman-RiemH, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, DominiqueJ, PohlC, WiesmanU, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 19–39.
   Google Scholar
• HöchtlF, LehringenS, KanoldW. 2006. Pure theory or useful tool? Experiences with transdisciplinarity in the Piedmont Alps. Environ Sci Pol. 9:322–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KloetR, HesselsL, ZweekhorstM, BroerseJ, De Cock BuningT. 2013. Understanding constraints in the dynamics of a research programme intended as a niche innovation. Sci Public Pol. 40(2):206–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LöwyI. 1992. The strength of loose concepts – boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: the case of immunology. Hist Sci.30:371–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaasenS, LengwilerM, GuggenheimM. 2006. Introduction: practices of transdisciplinary research: close(r) encounters of science and society. Sci Public Pol. 33:393–476.
   Google Scholar
• MesserliB, MesserliP. 2008. From local projects in the Alps to global change programmes in the mountains of the world: milestones in transdisciplinary research. In: Hirsch HadornG, Hoffman-RiemH, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, DominiqueJ, PohlC, WiesmanU, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• [MISTRA] Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research. 2012. Evaluation of the research program ‘Future Forests – sustainable strategies under uncertainty and risk’: final report.Stockholm: MISTRA.
   Google Scholar
• Mobjörk M. 2004. En Kluven tid: en studie av idéer och förställningar om vetenskap och kunskap i Stiftelsen för miljöstrategisk forskning, Mistra [doctoral thesis]. [Linköping]: Linköping University. Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences No. 299.
   Google Scholar
• MobjörkM. 2009. Crossing boundaries: the framing of transdisciplinarity. Örebro and Västerås: Örebro and Mälardalen Universities. Centre for Housing and Urban Research Series, Report No. 64.
   Google Scholar
• MobjörkM. 2010. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures. 42:866–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen J, Nordin A, Larsson S. 2012. Future Forests Scenarios 2050: possible futures, future possibilities. European Foresight Platform, Brief No. 209.
   Google Scholar
• MollingaPP. 2010. Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Sci. 50:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MusacchioL, Ozdenerol, BryantM, EvansT. 2005. Changing landscapes, changing disciplines: seeking to understand interdisciplinarity in landscape ecological change research. Landsc Urban Plann. 73:326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewellB, CrumleyCL, HassanN, LambinEF, Pahl-WostlC, UnderdalA, WassonR. 2005. A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research. Global Environ Change. 15:299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PodestáGP, NatenzonCE, HidalgoC, ToranzoFR. 2013. Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: a case study of collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas. Environ Sci Pol. 26:40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PohlC. 2005. Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures. 37:1159–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PohlC. 2008. From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environ Sci Pol. 11:46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PohlC, Hirsch HadornG. 2007. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research: proposed by the swiss academies of art and sciences. Munich: Oekomverlag.
   Google Scholar
• PohlC, van KerkhoffL, Hirsch HadornG, BammerG. 2008. Integration. In: Hirsch HadornG, Hoffman-RiemH, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, DominiqueJ, PohlC, WiesmanU, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 411–424.
   Google Scholar
• PregernigM. 2006. Transdisciplinarity viewed from afar: science-policy assessments as forums for the creation of transdisciplinary knowledge. Sci Pol. 33:445–455.
   Google Scholar
• RoelofsenA, BoonWPC, KloetRR, BroerseJEW. 2011. Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what?Res Pol. 40:341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RouxDJ, StirzakerJR, BreenCM, LefroyEC, CresswellHP. 2010. Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programme. Environ Sci Pol. 13:733–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchildI, SörlinS. 2002. The policy and practice of interdisciplinarity in the Swedish University Research System. Working Paper 2002:18. Stockholm: SISTER.
   Google Scholar
• ScoonesI, LeachM, SmithA, StaglS, StirlingA, ThompsonJ. 2007. Dynamic systems and the challenge of sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 1.Brighton: STEPS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• SmelserNJ. 2004. Interdisciplinarity in theory and practice. In: CamicC, JoasH, editors. The dialogical turn: new roles for sociology in the postdisciplinary age. Lanham (MD), Boulder (CO), New York (NY): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.; p. 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• StarS, GriesmerJ. 1989. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Soc Stud Sci. 19:387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KleinJ. 1996. Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottsville and London: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson KleinJ. 2004. Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures. 36:515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KleinJ. 2010. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: FrodemanR, Thompson KleinJ, MitchamC, editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• TressB, TressG, FryG. 2003. Conclusions: potentials and limitations of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinary landscape studies. In: TressB, TressG, van der ValkA, GryG, editors. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: potentials and limitations. Wageningen: DELTA Series 2; p. 182–192.
   Google Scholar
• WeingartP. 2010. A short history of knowledge formations. In: FrodemanR, Thompson KleinJ, MitchamC, editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• WiesmannU, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, Hirsch HadornG, Hoffmann-RiemH, DominiqueJ, PohlC, ZempE. 2008. Enhancing transdisciplinarity research: a synthesis in fifteen propositions. In: Hirsch HadornG, Hoffman-RiemH, Biber-KlemmS, Grossenbacher-MansuyW, DominiqueJ, PohlC, WiesmanU, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 19–39.
   Google Scholar