Constructing a new tool for assessing environmental worldviews of individuals and organizations – case environmental worldview analysis of seven political parties in Finland

References

• Anderson MW. 2012. New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale. The Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability. Available from: www.berkshirepublishing.com
   Google Scholar
• Baskin J. (2015). Paradigm dressed as epoch: the ideology of the anthropocene. Environ Value. 24:9–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeve-de Pauw J, Van Petegem P. 2013. A cross-cultural study of environmental values and their effect on the environmental behavior of children. Environ Behav. 45:551–583. 10.1177/0013916511429819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner FX, Wiseman M. 1999. Toward measuring adolescent environmental perception. Euro Psychol. 4:139–151.10.1027//1016-9040.4.3.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner FX, Wiseman M. 2006. Adolescents’ attitudes towards nature and environment: quantifying the 2-MEV model. Environmentalist. 26:247–254.10.1007/s10669-006-8660-9
   Google Scholar
• Borick CP, Rabe BG. 2010. A reason to believe: examining the factors that determine individual views on global warming. Soc Sci Quart. 91:777–800.10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttel F. 1996. Environmental and resource sociology: theoretical issues and opportunities for synthesis. Rural Soc. 61:56–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp J, Dauvergne, P. 2011. Paths to a green world: the political economy of the global environment. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; p.354, ISBN 978-0-262-51582-5.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap R, Jones R. 2002. Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. In: Dunlap RE, Michelson W, editors. The handbook of environmental sociology. Westport (CT): Greenwood Press; p. 482–524. ISBN 0313268088.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap RE, Jones RE. 2003. Environmental attitudes and values. In: Ferna′ndez-Ballesteros R, editor. Encyclopedia of psychological assessment. Vol. 1 . London: Sage; p. 364–369.
   Google Scholar
• Durnova A. 2013. A tale of ‘Fat Cats’ and ‘Stupid Activists’: contested values, governance and reflexivity in the Brno railway station controversy. J Environ Policy Plan. 1–17. 10.1080/1523908X.2013.829749
   Google Scholar
• ECLAC. 2000. Role of environmental awareness in achieving sustainable development. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Distr. Restricted. LC/R.1961.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding KS, et al. 2012. Australian politicians’ beliefs about climate change: political partisanship and political ideology. Environ Polit. 21:712–733.10.1080/09644016.2012.698887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Election Study Portal. 2014. Available from: http://www.vaalitutkimus.fi/en/
   Google Scholar
• Fransson N, Gärling T. 1999. Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J Environ Psychol. 19:369–382.10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddings B, Hopwood B, O’Brien G. 2002. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev. 10:187–196.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund K, Westinen J. 2012. Puoluevalinta, in the publication Muutosvaalit 2011 by Oikeusministeriö. Available from: http://www.oikeusministerio.fi/fi/index/julkaisut/julkaisuarkisto/162012muutosvaalit2011/Files/OMSO_16_2012_Muutosvaalit_2011_352_s.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harju-Autti P. 2012. A free online survey for measuring & illustrating individual environmental world views. Available from: http://player.zef.fi/zef2011/ajax/?q=3981-6ebdcd6z
   Google Scholar
• Harju-Autti P, Kokkinen E. 2014. A novel Environmental Awareness Index, measured cross-nationally for 57 countries. Univ J Environ Res Technol. 3:544–554.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä T. 2004. Tilastollinen tutkimus [Statistical research]. 5th ed. Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy. ISBN 951-37-4135-4.
   Google Scholar
• Janoušková S, Hák T. 2013. Values and sustainable development: reflection on selected Czech policy documents 1988–2010. J Environ Policy Plan. 15:371–386. 10.1080/1523908X.2013.766577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner BE, Payne D. 2002. Evolution and implementation: a study of values, business ethics, and corporate social responsibility. J Business Ethics. 41:297–311.10.1023/A:1021237420663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöckner C. 2013. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—a meta-analysis. Global Environ Change. 23:1028–1038.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöckner C, Blöbaum A. 2010. A comprehensive action determination model: toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. J Environ Psychol. 30:574–586.10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelock J. 2006. The revenge of Gaia: why the earth is fighting back – and how we can still save humanity. Santa Barbara (CA): Allen Lane. ISBN 0-7139-9914-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mainieri T et al. 1997. Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behaviour. J Soc Psychol. 137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney MP, Ward MP, Braucht GN. 1975. A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. Am Psychol. 30:787–790. 10.1037/h008439410.1037/h0084394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Duckitt J. 2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: a valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. J Environ Psychol. 30:80–94.10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paloheimo H, Raunio T. 2008. Puolueiden rooli ja tehtävät demokratiassa [Roles and duties of political parties in a democracy]. In: Paloheimo H, Raunio T, editors. Suomen puolueet ja puoluejärjestelmä. 1st ed. Helsinki: WSOY Oppimateriaalit Oy; p. 7–25. ISBN 978-951-0-33188-0.
   Google Scholar
• Partanen-Hertell M, Harju-Autti P, Kreft-Burman K, Pemberton D. 1999. Raising environmental awareness in the Baltic Sea area. Finnish Environment Institute, FE327, ISBN 952-11-1734-6 (pdf), Available as a pdf from: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/36461/browse?value=Partanen-Hertell%2C+Marjut&type=author
   Google Scholar
• Sartori G. 1976. Parties and party systems: a framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz P. 2011. Littering in context: personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environ Behav. 1–25. 10.1177/0013916511412179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz S. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings Psychol Cult. 2. 10.9707/2307-0919.1116
   Google Scholar
• Steg, et al. 2014. An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals. J Environ Psychol. 38:104–115.10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PC. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues. 56:407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Liere K, Dunlap R. 1981. Environmental concern: does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environ Behav.
   Google Scholar
• Weigel R, Weigel J. 1978. Environmental concern: the development of a measure. Environ Behav. 10:3–15. 10.1177/0013916578101001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiidegren O. 1998. The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environ Behav. 30:75–100.10.1177/0013916598301004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman M, Bogner FX. 2003. A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Pers Indiv Differ. 34:783–794.10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00071-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar