636
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Creating possibility spaces for the development of circular bioeconomy initiatives

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 209-225 | Received 29 Oct 2021, Accepted 03 Oct 2022, Published online: 25 Oct 2022

References

  • Albrecht M. 2019. (Re-)producing bioassemblages: positionalities of regional bioeconomy development in Finland. Local Environ. 24(4):342–357. doi:10.1080/13549839.2019.1567482.
  • Allen J, Cochrane A. 2010. Assemblages of state power: topological shifts in the organisation of government and politics. Antipode. 42(5):1071–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x.
  • Anderson B, McFarlane C. 2011. Assemblage and geography. Area. 43(2):124–127. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x.
  • Baker T, McGuirk P. 2017. Assemblage thinking as methodology: commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territ Politic Gov. 5(4):425–442. doi:10.1080/21622671.2016.1231631.
  • Banu JR, Kavitha S, Kannah RY, Kumar MD, Atabani AE, Kumar G. 2020. Biorefinery of spent coffee grounds waste: viable pathway towards circular bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol. 302.
  • Brandão AS, Goncalves A, Santos JMRCA. 2021. Circular bioeconomy strategies: from scientific research to commercially viable products. J Clean Prod. 295:126407. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126407.
  • Carus M, Dammer L. 2018. The “Circular bioeconomy”-Concepts, opportunities and limitations. Hürth. www.bio-based.eu/nova-papers.
  • Cumming T. 2015. Challenges of ‘thinking differently’ with rhizoanalytic approaches: a reflexive account. Int J Res Method Educ. 38(2):137–148. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.896892.
  • D’Amado I, Falcone PM, Huisingh D, Morone P. 2021. A circular economy model based on biomethane: what are the opportunities for the municipality of Rome and beyond? Renew Energy. 163:1660–1672. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.072.
  • D’Amato D, Korhonen J. 2021. Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecol Econ. 188:107143. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143.
  • D’Amato D, Veijonaho S, Toppinen A. 2020. Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in finnish SMEs. For Pol Econ. 110. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.004101848
  • DeLanda M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
  • Dittmer J. 2014. Geopolitical assemblages and complexity. Prog Hum Geogr. 38(3):385–401. doi:10.1177/0309132513501405.
  • European Commission. 2018. A new Bioeconomy strategy for a sustainable Europe Accessed January 2019. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6067_en.htm
  • European Energy Agency (EAA). 2018. The circular economy and the bioeconomy: partners in sustainability. EEA Report
  • Foodhills. 2018. Our vision. [Accessed Dec 2018]. https://foodhills.se/var-vision/.
  • Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ. 2017. The circular economy: a new sustainability paradigm? J Clean Prod. 143:757–768. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
  • Giampietro M. 2019. On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: implications for sustainable growth. Ecol Econ. 162:143–156. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001.
  • Gottinger A, Ladu L, Quitzow R. 2020. Studying the transition towards a circular bioeconomy – A systematic literature review on transition studies and existing barriers. Sustainability. 12(21):8990. doi:10.3390/su12218990.
  • Grandin J, Haarstad H. 2020. Transformation as relational mobilisation: the networked geography of Addis Ababa’s sustainable transport interventions. Society Space. 39(2):289–308.
  • Hammersley M, Atkinson P. 1995. Ethnography: principles in practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Hedeler B, Lettner M, Stern T, Schwarzbauer P, Hesser F. 2020. Strategic decisions on knowledge development and diffusion at pilot and demonstration projects: an empirical mapping of actors, projects and strategies in the case of circular forest bioeconomy. For Policy Econ. 110.
  • Hernández AS, Esteban E, Garrido P. 2019. Transition to a bioeconomy: perspectives from social sciences. J Clean Prod. 224:107–119. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168.
  • Hinderer S, Brändle L, Kuckertz A. 2021. Transition to a sustainable bioeconomy. Sustainability. 13(15):8232. doi:10.3390/su13158232.
  • Hobson K. 2016. Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy. Prog Hum Geogr. 40(1):88–104. doi:10.1177/0309132514566342.
  • Holden NM, Neill AM, Stout JC, Morris MA. 2022. Biocircularity: a framework to define sustainable, circular bioeconomy. Circ Econ Sustain. doi:10.1007/s43615-022-00180-y
  • Kardung M, Drabik D. 2021. Full speed ahead or floating around? Dynamics of selected circular bioeconomies in Europe. Ecological Economics. 188:107146. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107146.
  • Law J. 2004. After method: mess in social science research. UK: Routledge.
  • Longhurst PJ, Tompkins D, Pollard SJT, Hough RL, Chambers B, Gale P, Tyrrel S, Villa R, Taylor M, Wu S, et al. 2019. Risk assessment for quality-assured, source-segregated composts and anaerobic digestates for a circular bioeconomy in the UK. Environ Int. 127:253–266. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.044.
  • Mak TMW, Xiong X, Tsang DCW, Yu IKM, Poon CS. 2020. Sustainable food waste management towards circular bioeconomy: policy review, limitations and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 297.
  • McCann E, Ward K. 2015. Thinking through dualisms in urban policy mobilities. Int J Urban Reg Res. 39(4):828–830. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12254.
  • McCormick K, Kautto N. 2013. The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustain. 5(6):2589–2608. doi:10.3390/su5062589.
  • Merli R, Preziosi M, Acampora A. 2018. How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod. 178:703–722. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112.
  • Miles BM, Huberman AM. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. London (UK): Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Muscat A, de Olde E, Ripoll-Bosch R, Van Zanten HHE, Metze TAP, Termeer CJAM, van Ittersum MK, de Boer IJM. 2021. Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy. Nature Food: Perspective. 2(8):561–566. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7.
  • Näyhä A. 2020. Finnish forest-based companies in transition to the circular bioeconomy – drivers, organisational resources and innovations. For Policy Econ. 110.
  • O’Neill K, Gibbs D. 2016. Rethinking green entrepreneurship – fluid narratives of the green economy. Environ Plan A. 48:1727–1749.
  • Prince CP. 2010. Policy transfer as policy assemblage: making policy for the creative industries in New Zeeland. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 42:1(1):169–186. doi:10.1068/a4224.
  • Skåne Regional Council. 2018. Food Valley of Sweden: steg 1 – etablering av food valley of Bjuv. Skåne, Sweden.
  • Stegmann P, Londo M, Junginger M. 2020. The circular bioeconomy: its elements and role in the European bioeconomy. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X. 6:100029. doi:10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029.
  • Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth. 2019. Exempel på lyckad omställning. Accessed May 2020. https://tillvaxtverket.se/amnesomraden/regional-kapacitet/omstallningsguide/exempel-pa-omstallningsarbeten.html
  • Ubando AT, Felix CB, Chen WH. 2020. Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: a comprehensive review. Bioresour Technol. 299.
  • Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S. 1999. The Innovation Journey. Oxford (New York): Oxford University Press Inc.
  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (Wbcsd). 2020. Circular bioeconomy: the business opportunity contributing to a sustainable world. WBCSD, [Accesssed Nov 2020.] file://storage.slu.se/Home$/pehl0003/Downloads/circular_bioeconomy%20report_final.pdf