Climate change mitigation and SDGs: modelling the regional potential of promising mitigation measures and assessing their impact on other SDGs

References

• Abanades JC, Arias, B, Lyngfelt, A, Mattisson, T, Wiley, D. E., Li, H, Ho, M.T, Mangano, E, Brandani, S. 2015. Emerging CO2 capture systems. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 40:126–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbass RA, Kumar P, El-Gendy A. 2018. An overview of monitoring and reduction strategies for health and climate change related emissions in the Middle East and North Africa region. Atmos Environ. 175:33–43. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aditya L, Mahlia TMI, Rismanchi B, Ng HM, Hasan MH, Metselaar HSC, Muraza O, Aditiya HB. 2017. A review on insulation materials for energy conservation in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 73:1352–1365. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam MS, Hyde B, Duffy P, McNabola A. 2018. Analysing the co-benefits of transport fleet and fuel policies in reducing PM2.5 and CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod. 172:623–634. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hamamre Z, Saidan M, Hararah M, Rawajfeh K, Alkhasawneh HE, Al-Shannag M. 2017. Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 67:295–314. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allouhi A, El Fouih Y, Kousksou T, Jamil A, Zeraouli Y, Mourad Y. 2015. Energy consumption and efficiency in buildings: current status and future trends. J Clean Prod. 109:118–130. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner RJ. 2019. Sustainable development goals and the forest sector—a complex relationship. Forests. 10(2):152. doi:10.3390/f10020152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrak M, Marafa L, Ten years of REDD+: a critical review of the impact of REDD+ on forest-dependent communities. Sustainability, 2016. 8(7).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand C, Anable, J, Ketsopoulou, I, Watson, J. 2020. Road to zero or road to nowhere? Disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world. Energy Policy:139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui M, Adjiman, C.S, Bardow, A, Anthony, E.J, Boston, A, Brown, S, Fennell, P.S, Fuss, S, Galindo, A, Hackett, L.A, Hallett, J.P, Herzog, H.J, Jackson, G, Kemper, J, Krevor, S, Maitland, G.C, Matuszewski, M, Metcalfe, I.S, Petit, C, Puxty, G, Reimer, J, et al. 2018. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ Sci. 11(5):1062–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calel R, Mahdavi P. 2020. Opinion: the unintended consequences of antiflaring policies-and measures for mitigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117(23):12503–12507. doi:10.1073/pnas.2006774117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin KV, Beach R, Gurgel A, Labriet M, Loboguerrero Rodriguez AM. 2016. Agriculture, forestry, and other land-use emissions in Latin America. Energy Econ. 56:615–624. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagnolo L, Davide M. 2019. Can the Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assessment of climate mitigation co-benefits or side-effects on poverty and inequality. World Dev. 122:96–109. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasso A, Capodaglio P, Simonetto F, Sethi R. 2019. Environmental and economic benefits from the phase-out of residential oil heating: a study from the Aosta Valley Region (Italy). Sustainability. 11(13):3633. doi:10.3390/su11133633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagnachew A.G, Hof, A, van Soest, H, van Vuuren, D, et al. 2021. Climate change measures and sustainable development goals: mapping synergies and trade-offs to guide multi-level decision-making. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; p. 55.
   Google Scholar
• Daioglou V, van Ruijven BJ, van Vuuren DP. 2012. Model projections for household energy use in developing countries. Energy. 37(1):601–615. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HS, van Vuuren D. 2017. Representation of variable renewable energy sources in TIMER, an aggregated energy system simulation model. Energy Econ. 64:600–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetman S, de Boer, H.S, Van Engelenburg, M, van der Voet, E, van Vuuren, D.P , et al. 2021. Projected material requirements for the global electricity infrastructure – generation, transmission and storage. Resources. Conserv Recyling:164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105200
   Google Scholar
• de Jong W, Pokorny B, Katila P, Galloway G, Pacheco P. 2018. Community forestry and the sustainable development goals: a two way street. Forests. 9(6):331. doi:10.3390/f9060331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNooyer TA, Peschel JM, Zhang Z, Stillwell AS. 2016. Integrating water resources and power generation: the energy–water nexus in Illinois. Appl Energy. 162:363–371. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelman JC, Stehfest E, Tabeau A, van Meijl H, Lassaletta L, Gernaat DEHJ, Hermans K, Harmsen M, Daioglou V, Biemans H. 2018. Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. Glob Environ Change. 48:119–135. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelman JC, Stehfest E, Vuuren DP, Tabeau A, Hof AF, Braakhekke MC, Gernaat DEHJ, Berg M, Zeist W-J, Daioglou V, et al. 2020. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: potentials, risks and trade-offs. Glob Chang Biol. 26(3):1576–1591. doi:10.1111/gcb.14887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Ouyang M, Chen J. 2017. Prospects for Chinese electric vehicle technologies in 2016–2020: ambition and rationality. Energy. 120:584–596. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECE. 2020. Draft Industrial Energy Efficiency Action Plan, and assessment of the role of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe in delivering on it. Geneva: Economic Commission for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. 2020. Time to revise the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature. 583:331–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards MR, Cui R, Bindl M, Hultman N, Mathur K, McJeon H, Iyer G, Song J, Zhao A. 2022. Quantifying the regional stranded asset risks from new coal plants under 1.5 °C. Environ Res Lett. 17(2):024029. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac4ec2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emam A. 2015. Gas flaring in industry: an overview. Petroleum Coal. 57(7):23.
   Google Scholar
• Fader M, Cranmer, C, Lawford, R, Engel-Cox, J, et al. 2018. Toward an understanding of synergies and trade-offs between water, energy, and food SDG targets. Front Environ Sci:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00112
   Google Scholar
• Fekete H, Roelfsema, M, Höhne, N, den Elzen, M, Forsell, N, Becerra, S, et al. 2015. Impacts of good practice policies on regional and global greenhouse gas emissions. Cologne, Germany: PBL/NewClimate Institute/IIASA.
   Google Scholar
• Flederbach B, Winch J, Adipic acid production issue paper. 2019, ClimeCo Corporation: Boyertown (Pennsylvania).
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann CJ, Mehra, M, Allard, R, Bayuk, K, Gouveia, JP, Gorman, MR, et al. 2020. Drawdown’s “system of solutions” helps to achieve the SDGs. Partnerships for the Goals:1–25 .https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_100-1
   Google Scholar
• Fujimori S, Hasegawa T, Krey V, Riahi K, Bertram C, Bodirsky BL, Bosetti V, Callen J, Després J, Doelman J, et al. 2019. A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation. Nat Sustain. 2(5):386–396. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0286-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuso Nerini F, Tomei J, To LS, Bisaga I, Parikh P, Black M, Borrion A, Spataru C, Castán Broto V, Anandarajah G. 2018. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Energy. 3(1):10–15. doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambhir A, Napp, T, Hawkes, A, Höglund-Isaksson, L, Winiwarter, W, Purohit, P, Wagner, F, Bernie, D, Lowe, J, et al. 2017. The contribution of non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation to achieving long-term temperature goals. Vol. 10 5, . doi:10.3390/en10050602.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparatos A, Doll, CNH, Esteban, M, Ahmed, A, Olang, TA, et al. 2017. Renewable energy and biodiversity: implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 70:161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, McMeekin A, Mylan J, Southerton D. 2015. A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: the reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Glob Environ Change. 34:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giwa SO, Nwaokocha CN, Kuye SI, Adama KO. 2019. Gas flaring attendant impacts of criteria and particulate pollutants: a case of Niger Delta region of Nigeria. JKSUES. 31(3):209–217. doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2017.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Sanabria A, Kiesewetter G, Klimont Z, Schoepp W, Haberl H. 2022. Potential for future reductions of global GHG and air pollutants from circular waste management systems. Nat Commun. 13(1):106. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27624-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta KK, Aneja KR, Rana D. 2016. Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresour Bioprocess. 3(1).
   Google Scholar
• Haines A, Amann M, Borgford-Parnell N, Leonard S, Kuylenstierna J, Shindell D. 2017. Short-lived climate pollutant mitigation and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Clim Chang. 7(12):863–869. doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero M, Thornton PK, Mason-D’Croz D, Palmer J, Bodirsky BL, Pradhan P, Barrett CB, Benton TG, Hall A, Pikaar I. 2021. Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Planet Health. 5(1):e50–e62. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30277-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffacker MK, Allen MF, Hernandez RR. 2017. Land-sparing opportunities for solar energy development in agricultural landscapes: a case study of the Great Central Valley, CA, United States. Environ Sci Technol. 51(24):14472–14482. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton RA, Nassikas AA. 2017. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 31(3):456–472. doi:10.1002/2016GB005546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobuţă GI, Höhne, N, van Soest, HL, Leemans, R, et al., Transitioning to low-carbon economies under the 2030 agenda: minimizing trade-offs and enhancing co-benefits of climate-change action for the SDGs. Sustainability, 2021. 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910774
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2020. Energy technology perspectives 2020. France: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2021. Global Energy Review 2021: assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO2 emissions in 2021. France: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, Climate Change 2014: synthesis report, in Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2015, IPCC: Geneva (Switzerland). p. 151.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty , et al, Editors. 2018 Global Warming of 1.5°C. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2016. Renewable energy market analysis: Latin America. Abu Dhabi:IRENA.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson MT, Thollander P. 2018. A review of barriers to and driving forces for improved energy efficiency in Swedish industry–recommendations for successful in-house energy management. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 82:618–628. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karner K, Dißauer C, Enigl M, Strasser C, Schmid E. 2017. Environmental trade-offs between residential oil-fired and wood pellet heating systems: forecast scenarios for Austria until 2030. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 80:868–879. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kester J, Noel L, Zarazua de Rubens G, Sovacool BK. 2018. Policy mechanisms to accelerate electric vehicle adoption: a qualitative review from the Nordic region. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 94:719–731. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevisan B, Duan, N, Tsapekos, P, Awasthi, MK, Liu, Z, Mohammadi, A, Angelidaki, I, Tsang, DCW, Zhang, Z, Pan, J, Ma, L, Aghbashlo, M, Tabatabaei, M, Liu, H, et al. 2021. A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev:135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegler E, Bertram C, Kuramochi T, Jakob M, Pehl M, Stevanović M, Höhne N, Luderer G, Minx JC, Fekete H. 2018. Short term policies to keep the door open for Paris climate goals. Environ Res Lett. 13(7):074022. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aac4f1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lah O. 2015. The barriers to low-carbon land-transport and policies to overcome them. Eur Trans Res Rev. 7(1). doi:10.1007/s12544-014-0151-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M-J, Tao W-Q. 2017. Review of methodologies and policies for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry. Appl Energy. 187:203–215. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yang, Q, Zhang, Y, Sun, W, Xu, Y, et al. 2019. Analysis of CO2 emissions in China’s manufacturing industry based on extended logarithmic mean division index decomposition. Sustainability. 11(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, P. L., Hilderink, H. B. M., Janssen, P. H. M., Kc, S., van Vuuren, D. P., & Niessen, L. (2019). Future impacts of environmental factors on achieving the SDG target on child mortality—A synergistic assessment. Global Environmental Change, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Lu C, Zhao T, Shi X, Cao S. 2018. Ecological restoration by afforestation may increase groundwater depth and create potentially large ecological and water opportunity costs in arid and semiarid China. J Clean Prod. 176:1213–1222. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv C, Xu J, Xie H, Zeng Z, Wu Y. 2016. Equilibrium strategy based coal blending method for combined carbon and PM10 emissions reductions. Appl Energy. 183:1035–1052. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinauskaite J, Jouhara H, Ahmad L, Milani M, Montorsi L, Venturelli M. 2019. Energy efficiency in industry: EU and national policies in Italy and the UK. Energy. 172:255–269. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum DL, Echeverri LG, Busch S, Pachauri S, Parkinson S, Rogelj J, Krey V, Minx JC, Nilsson M, Stevance A-S, et al. 2018. Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environ Res Lett. 13(3):033006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh L. 2017. World energy needs: a role for coal in the energy mix. In: Hester RE, Harrison RM, editors. Coal in the 21st century: energy needs, chemicals and environmental controls. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 1–29. doi:10.1039/9781788010115.
   Google Scholar
• Mehetre SA, Panwar NL, Sharma D, Kumar H. 2017. Improved biomass cookstoves for sustainable development: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 73:672–687. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messagie M. 2014. Life cycle analysis of the climate impact of electric vehicles (Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel). Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Research Group MOBI.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet A, Teillard F, Boettcher P, De’ Besi G, Besbes B. 2018. Review: domestic herbivores and food security: current contribution, trends and challenges for a sustainable development. Animal. 12(s2):s188–s198. doi:10.1017/S1751731118002215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson M, Chisholm E, Griggs D, Howden-Chapman P, McCollum D, Messerli P, Neumann B, Stevance A-S, Visbeck M, Stafford-Smith M, et al. 2018. Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustain Sci. 13(6):1489–1503. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nižetić S, Djilali, N, Papadopoulos, A, Rodrigues, JJPC, et al. 2019. Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. J Clean Prod. 231:565–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre CA, Sampaio G, Borma LS, Castilla-Rubio JC, Silva JS, Cardoso M. 2016. Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113(39):10759–10768. doi:10.1073/pnas.1605516113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivier JGJ, Peters JAHW, Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 report. 2020, The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill BC, Kriegler, E, Ebi, KL, Kemp-Benedict, E, Riahi, K, Rothman, DS, van Ruijven, BJ, van Vuuren, DP, Birkmann, J, Kok, K, Levy, M, Solecki, W, et al. 2015. The roads ahead: narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob Environ Change.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patra PK, Canadell JG, Houghton RA, Piao SL, Oh N-H, Ciais P, Manjunath KR, Chhabra A, Wang T, Bhattacharya T. 2013. The carbon budget of South Asia. Biogeosciences. 10(1):513–527. doi:10.5194/bg-10-513-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP. 2017. A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future. 5(11):1169–1179. doi:10.1002/2017EF000632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujara Y, Pathak P, Sharma A, Govani J. 2019. Review on Indian Municipal Solid Waste Management practices for reduction of environmental impacts to achieve sustainable development goals. J Environ Manage. 248:109238. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quader MA, Ahmed S, Raja Ghazilla RA, Ahmed S, Dahari M. 2016. Evaluation of criteria for CO2 capture and storage in the iron and steel industry using the 2-tuple DEMATEL technique. J Clean Prod. 120:207–220. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaj P, Kiesewetter, G, Krey, V, Schöpp, W, Bertram, C, Drouet, L, Fricko, O, Shinichiro, F, Harmsen, M, Hilaire, J, Huppmann, D, Klimont, Z, Kolp, P, Aleluia Reis, L, van Vuuren, DP, et al. 2021. Air quality and health implications of 1.5–2°C climate pathways under considerations of ageing population: a multi-model scenario analysis. Environ Res Lett. 16(4):e045005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman FA, Aziz MMA, Saidur R, Bakar WAWA, Hainin MR, Putrajaya R, Hassan NA. 2017. Pollution to solution: capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 71:112–126. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelfsema M, Fekete H, Höhne N, den Elzen M, Forsell N, Kuramochi T, de Coninck H, van Vuuren DP. 2018. Reducing global GHG emissions by replicating successful sector examples: the ‘good practice policies’ scenario. Climate Policy. 18(9):1103–1113. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1481356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwerhoff G, Sy M. 2017. Financing renewable energy in Africa – key challenge of the sustainable development goals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 75:393–401. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma T, Balachandra P. 2015. Benchmarking sustainability of Indian electricity system: an indicator approach. Appl Energy. 142:206–220. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharmina M, Edelenbosch, OY, Wilson, C, Freeman, R, Gernaat, DEHJ, Gilbert, P, Larkin, A, Littleton, EW, Traut, M, van Vuuren, DP, Vaughan, NE, Wood, FR, Le Quéré, C, et al. 2020. Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5–2°C. Climate Policy:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons RA, Shaver GM, Tyner WE, Garimella SV. 2015. A benefit-cost assessment of new vehicle technologies and fuel economy in the U.S. market. Appl Energy. 157:940–952. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh GG, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Swartz W, Cheung W, Guy JA, Kenny T-A, McOwen CJ, Asch R, Geffert JL, Wabnitz CCC. 2018. A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals. Marine Policy. 93:223–231. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh V, Sharma SK. 2016. Analyzing the moderating effects of respondent type and experience on the fuel efficiency improvement in air transport using structural equation modeling. Eur Trans Res Rev. 8(2). doi:10.1007/s12544-016-0199-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J, Sharma SK, Srivastava R. 2019. AHP-Entropy based priority assessment of factors to reduce aviation fuel consumption. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 10(2):212–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith P, Adams J, Beerling DJ, Beringer T, Calvin KV, Fuss S, Griscom B, Hagemann N, Kammann C, Kraxner F. 2019. Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal and their impacts on ecosystem services and the sustainable development goals. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 44(1):255–286. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P, Davis SJ, Creutzig F, Fuss S, Minx J, Gabrielle B, Kato E, Jackson RB, Cowie A, Kriegler E. 2016. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang. 6(1):42–50. doi:10.1038/nclimate2870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soergel B, Kriegler E, Weindl I, Rauner S, Dirnaichner A, Ruhe C, Hofmann M, Bauer N, Bertram C, Bodirsky BL, et al. 2021. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda. Nat Clim Chang. 11(8):656–664. doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltanieh M, Zohrabian A, Gholipour MJ, Kalnay E. 2016. A review of global gas flaring and venting and impact on the environment: case study of Iran. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 49:488–509. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehfest E, van Vuuren, DP, Kram, T, Bouwman, L, et al. 2014. Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0: model description and policy applications. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sy VD, Herold M, Achard F, Beuchle R, Clevers JGPW, Lindquist E, Verchot L. 2015. Land use patterns and related carbon losses following deforestation in South America. Environ Res Lett. 10(12):124004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait-Burkard C, Doeschl-Wilson A, McGrew MJ, Archibald AL, Sang HM, Houston RD, Whitelaw CB, Watson M. 2018. Livestock 2.0 – genome editing for fitter, healthier, and more productive farmed animals. Genome Biol. 19(1):204. doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1583-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson RL, Lassaletta L, Patra PK, Wilson C, Wells KC, Gressent A, Koffi EN, Chipperfield MP, Winiwarter W, Davidson EA. 2019. Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion. Nat Clim Chang. 9(12):993–998. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0613-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly 21 October . 2015 Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
   Google Scholar
• van Ruijven BJ, van Vuuren DP, Boskaljon W, Neelis ML, Saygin D, Patel MK. 2016. Long-termmodel-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries. Resources. Resour Conserv Recyling. 112:15–36. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Sluisveld MAE, Martínez SH, Daioglou V, van Vuuren DP. 2016. Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2 °C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 102:309–319. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Soest HL, Aleluia Reis L, Baptista LB, Bertram C, Després J, Drouet L, den Elzen M, Fragkos P, Fricko O, Fujimori S, et al. 2021. Global roll-out of comprehensive policy measures may aid in bridging emissions gap. Nat Commun. 12(1):6419. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26595-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vuuren DP, van Ruijven, B, Hoogwijk, MM, Isaac, M, De Vries, HJM, et al. 2006. TIMER 2: model description and application. In: Bouwman AF, Kram T, Goldewijk KK, editors. Integrated modelling of global environmental change: an overview of IMAGE 2.4. Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP); p. 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Von Stechow C, Minx, JC, Riahi, K, Jewell, J, McCollum, DL, Callaghan, MW, Bertram, C, Luderer, G, Baiocchi, G, et al. 2016. 2°C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? Environ Res Lett:11(3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilberforce T, Baroutaji A, Soudan B, Al-Alami AH, Olabi AG. 2019. Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges. Sci Total Environ. 657:56–72. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyborn C, Datta A, Montana J, Ryan M, Leith P, Chaffin B, Miller C, van Kerkhoff L. 2019. Co-producing sustainability: reordering the governance of science, policy, and practice. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 44(1):319–346. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ren J, Solgaard HS, Xu D, Nguyen TT. 2018. Using multi‐criteria analysis to prioritize renewable energy home heating technologies. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 29:36–43. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2018.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P, Shen Y. 2015b. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature. 528(7580):51–59. doi:10.1038/nature15743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Worrell E, Crijns-Graus W. 2015a. Mapping and modeling multiple benefits of energy efficiency and emission mitigation in China’s cement industry at the provincial level. Appl Energy. 155:35–58. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar