Who cares about development outcomes? Market failures and the role of the evaluation function

References

• Akerlof, G. A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500. doi:10.2307/1879431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch, U. 1998. Financial Risks and Rewards in LNG Projects: Qatar, Oman, and Yemen. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, U., and B. Müller. 2000. Fossil Fuels in a Changing Climate. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N., and W. Savedoff. 2010. Cash on Delivery: A New Approach to Foreign Aid. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• CGD. 2006. When Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives through Impact Evaluation. Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group, May. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• CGD. 2010. Nancy Birdsall on Cash on Delivery Aid. Accessed September 9, 2014. http://international.cgdev.org/blog/nancy-birdsall-cash-delivery-aid
   Google Scholar
• DFID. 2011. Writing a Business Case, How to Note. A DFID Practice Paper, August. London: Department for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• DFID. 2014. Review of Embedding Evaluation in the Department for International Development. Final Report, February. London: Department for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder, M. M., and B. Briceño. 2010. “Institutionalisation of Government Evaluation: Balancing Trade-Offs.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 2 (3). doi:10.1080/19439342.2010.505027.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder, M. M., and H. White. 2009. “The International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie): An Introduction.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 1 (3). doi:10.1080/19439340903147685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2014. “Finding Out What Works: Tracking Results in the Inter-American Development Bank.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (4): 480–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. 1979. “Moral Hazard and Observability.” The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74–91. doi:10.2307/3003320.
   Google Scholar
• IDB. 2010. Report on the Ninth General Increase in the Resources of the Inter-American Development Bank. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• IEG. 2013a. World Bank Group Assistance to Low-Income Fragile and Conflict-Affected States. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• IEG. 2013b. Improving Institutional Capability and Financial Viability to Sustain Transport. An Evaluation of World Bank Group Support Since 2002. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• IEG. 2013c. Managing Forest Resources for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• IEG. 2014. Learning and Results in World Bank Operations. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lindkvist, I., and V. Dixon. 2014. “To Feel Good or to Do Good? Why We Need Strong Institutions to Ensure a Results Focus in (Norwegian) Development Assistance.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (4): 350–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R., D. Poate, and E. Villanger. 2014. “Results Measurement and Evaluability: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6 (4): 378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B., U. Mummert, P. Murrell, and P. Seabright. 2001. The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirrlees, J. 1999. “The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behaviour: Part I.” The Review of Economic Studies 66 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norad. 2012a. Evaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation with Afghanistan 2001–2011, 2012/3. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Norad. 2012b. Evaluation of the Norway India Partnership Initiative for Maternal and Child Health, 2013/3. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Norad. 2012c. Mainstreaming Disability in the New Development Paradigm Evaluation of Norwegian Support to Promote the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2012/1. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Norad. 2012d. Real-Time Evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative: Lessons Learned from Support to Civil Society Organisations, 2012/5. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Norad. 2013. Real-Time Evaluation of Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative Contribution to Measurement, Reporting and Verification, 2013/5. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Norad. 2014. Can We Demonstrate the Difference that Norwegian Aid Makes?, 2014/1. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• OVE. 2010. Ten Years of Evaluability at the IDB, Presentation at the OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OVE. 2013. Mid-Term Evaluation of IDB-9 Commitments. The Development Effectiveness Framework and the Development Effectiveness Overview. Background Paper. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, R. 1985a. “The Theory of Principal and Agent—Part I.” Bulletin of Economic Research 37 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.1985.tb00179.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, R. 1985b. “The Theory of Principal and Agent –Part II.” Bulletin of Economic Research 37 (2): 75–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.1985.tb00185.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rothengatter, W. 1994. “Do External Benefits Compensate for External Costs of Transport.” Transportation Research 28 (4): 321–328.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387–389. doi:10.2307/1925895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavell, S. 1979. “Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship.” The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 55–73. doi:10.2307/3003319.
   Google Scholar
• Slovik, P. 2010. Market Uncertainty and Market Instability. IFC Bulletin No. 34. Basel: Bank for International Settlement.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, A. M. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A. M., and R. Zeckhauser. 1971. “Insurance, Information, and Individual Action, Am.” Economics Reviews 61: 380–387.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 1974. “Incentives and Risk Sharing in Sharecropping.” The Review of Economic Studies 41: 219–255. doi:10.2307/2296714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 1976. “The Efficiency Wage Hypothesis, Surplus Labour, and the Distribution of Income in L.D.C.s.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 28 (2), 185–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 1987. “Principal and agent.” The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics 3: 966–971.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 2009. “Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 1 (3). doi:10.1080/19439340903114628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2014. World Bank Scorecard. Accessed April, 3. http://www.worldbank.org/results/CSC/2014_WBG_corporate_scorecard_e-version.pdf
   Google Scholar