Measuring results in development: the role of impact evaluation in agency-wide performance measurement systems

References

• ADB. 2012. ADB Results Framework Indicators Definition. Manila: Asian Development Bank. http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/ADB%20Results%20Framwork%20Indicators%20Definition_updated%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Briceno, B., L. Cuesta, and O. Attanasio. 2011. “Behind the Scenes: Experience Managing and Conducting Large Impact Evaluations in Colombia.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 3: 470–501. doi:10.1080/19439342.2011.636485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. B., A. Mishra, and A. N. Brown. 2014. How Much Have We Learned? The Growth of Impact Evaluation for International Development. Mimeo. Washington, DC: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, A., M. Raza, A. Jenkins, and M. M. Nandita. 2014. “Measuring the Effects of Interventions in BRAC, and How This Has Driven ‘Development’.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, M. A., and G. Demombynes. 2011. “When Does Rigorous Impact Evaluation Make a Difference? The Case of the Millennium Villages.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 3: 305–339. doi:10.1080/19439342.2011.587017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, V., and I. Lindkvist. 2014. “To Feel Good or to Do Good? Why We Need Strong Institutions to Ensure a Results Focus in (Norwegian) Development Assistance.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 350–360.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder, M. 2014. “Who Cares About Development Outcomes? Market Failures and the Role of the Evaluation Function.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 361–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaarder, M. M., and B. Briceño. 2010. “Institutionalisation of Government Evaluation: Balancing Trade-Offs.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 2: 289–309. doi:10.1080/19439342.2010.505027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAO. 2001. Observations on the US Agency for International Development’s Fiscal Year 1999 Performance Report and Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001 Performance Plans. Washington, DC: GAO.
   Google Scholar
• Garbero, A. 2014. “Global Poverty and Economic Mobility Estimates Using IFAD’s RIMS Surveys.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 490–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2014. “Finding Out What Works: Tracking Results in the Inter-American Development Bank.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 480–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, K., and C. Hutchings. 2011. Can We Obtain the Required Rigour without Randomisation? 3ie Working Paper 13. Accessed June 3, 2014. http://www.3ieimpact.org/en/evaluation/working-papers/working-paper-13/
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, C. 2014. “Balancing Accountability and Learning: A review of Oxfam GB’s Global Performance Framework.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 425–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IADB. 2014. Development Effectiveness Overview. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• IEG. 2008. The Welfare Impact of Rural Electrification: A Reassessment of the Costs and Benefits. Washington, DC: IEG, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• IEG. 2012. Impact Evaluation. Washington, DC: IEG, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• IFAD. 2011. IFAD Strategic Framework, 2011-2015. Rome: IFAD.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R., D. Poate, and E. Villanger. 2014. “Results Measurement and Evaluability: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masset, E., A. Acharya, C. Barnett, and T. Dogbe. 2013. “An Impact Evaluation Design for the Millennium Villages Project in Northern Ghana.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 5: 137–157. doi:10.1080/19439342.2013.790914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natsios, A. 2010. The Clash of the Counter-bureaucracy and Development, CGD Essay. Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Norad. 2014. Can We Demonstrate the Differences that Norwegian Aid Makes? Evaluation of Results Measurement and How This Can Be Improved. Evaluation Department Evaluation Report 1/2014. Oslo: Norad.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S., I. Goldman, N. Gasa, I. Akhalwaya, B. Leon, and H. Mohammed. 2014. “A Focus on M&E of Results – An Example from the Presidency, South Africa.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 392–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixto, A., J. Molyneaux, and J. Sturdy. 2014. “Learning from Evaluation at MCC.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 436–450.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbæk, S., and H. Nøhr. 2014. “Evaluation of Development Aid - What Is the Contribution of Denmark?” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 451–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USAID. 2000. FY 2000 Performance Review. Washington, DC: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Villanger, E. 2014. “Assessing Aid Impacts Revisited: Results measurement in Norwegian Aid.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 6: 461–479.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 2004. “Challenges in Evaluating Development Effectiveness.” In Evaluating Development Effectiveness, edited by Pitman et al. Somerset: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 2010. “A Contribution to Current Debates in Impact Evaluation.” Evaluation 16: 153–164. doi:10.1177/1356389010361562.
   Google Scholar