1,077
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Moving on from logical frameworks to find the ‘missing middle’ in international development programmes

, &
Pages 89-103 | Received 17 Mar 2018, Accepted 29 Sep 2018, Published online: 30 Nov 2018

References

  • Astbury, B., and F. L. Leeuw. 2010. “Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation.” American Journal of Evaluation 31 (3): 363–381. doi:10.1177/1098214010371972.
  • Berk, R. A., and P.H. Rossi. 1999. Thinking about Program Evaluation. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Blamey, A., and M. Mackenzie. 2007. “Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation: Peas in a Pod or Apples and Oranges?” Evaluation 13 (4): 439–456. doi:10.1177/1356389007082129.
  • Breuer, E., L. Lee, M. De Silva, and C. Lund. 2016. “Using Theory of Change to Design and Evaluate Public Health Interventions: A Systematic Review.” Implementation Science 11 (63). doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0422-6.
  • Chen, H.-T. 1990. Theory-Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage Publications.
  • Coryn, C. L. S., L. A. Noakes, C. D. Westine, and D. C. Schröter. 2011. “A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice from 1990 to 2009.” American Journal of Evaluation 32 (2): 199–226. doi:10.1177/1098214010389321.
  • De Silva, M. J., E. Breuer, L. Lee, L. Asher, N. Chowdhary, C. Lund, and V. Patel. 2014. “Theory of Change: A Theory-Driven Approach to Enhance the Medical Research Council’s Framework for Complex Interventions.” Trials 15: 267. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-267.
  • Donaldson, S. I. 2007. Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science: Strategies and Applications. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Funnell, S. C., and P. J. Rogers. 2011. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic models/Sue C. Funnell and Patricia J. Rogers. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gasper, D. 1997. ‘Logical Frameworks’: A Critical Assessment: Institute of Social Studies (Working Paper no.278).
  • Greenhalgh, T., C. Humphrey, J. Hughes, F. Macfarlane, C. Butler, and R. Pawson. 2009. “How Do You Modernize a Health Service? A Realist Evaluation of Whole Scale Transformation in London.” Milbank Quarterly 87 (2): 391–416. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00562.x.
  • Greenhalgh, T., G. Wong, J. Jagosh, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, G. Westhorp, and R. Pawson. 2015. “Protocol—The RAMESES II Study: Developing Guidance and Reporting Standards for Realist Evaluation.” BMJ Open 5: 8. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567.
  • Hoksbergen, R. G. 1986. “Approaches to Evaluation of Development Interventions the Importance of World and Life Views.” World Development: The Multi-Disciplinary International Journal Devoted to the Study and Promotion of World Development 14 (2): 283–300. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(86)90060-4.
  • Jagosh, J., N. Tilley, and E. Stern. 2016. “Realist Evaluation at 25: Cumulating Knowledge, Advancing Debates and Innovating Methods.” Evaluation 22 (3): 267–269. doi:10.1177/1356389016656502.
  • Jagosh, J., P. L. Bush, S. Jon, A. C. Macaulay, T. Greenhalgh, G. Wong, M. Cargo, L. W. Green, C. P. Herbert, and P. Pluye. 2015. “A Realist Evaluation of Community-Based Participatory Research: Partnership Synergy, Trust Building and Related Ripple Effects.” BMC Public Health 15 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
  • James, C. 2013. Theory of Change Review (A report commissioned by Comic Relief. 2).
  • Leeuw, F. L., and S. I. Donaldson. 2015. “Theory in Evaluation: Reducing Confusion and Encouraging Debate.” Evaluation 21 (4): 467–480. doi:10.1177/1356389015607712.
  • Leroy, J., M. Ruel, and E. Verhofstadt. 2009. “The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes on Child Nutrition: A Review of Evidence Using a Programme Theory Framework.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 1 (2): 103–129. doi:10.1080/19439340902924043.
  • Marchal, B., S. van Belle, J. van Olmen, T. Hoerée, and G. Kegels. 2012. “Is Realist Evaluation Keeping Its Promise? A Review of Published Empirical Studies in the Field of Health Systems Research.” Evaluation 18 (2): 192–212. doi:10.1177/1356389012442444.
  • Nancholas, S. 1998. “How to Do (Or Not to Do) … A Logical Framework.” Health Policy and Planning 13 (2): 189–193. doi:10.1093/heapol/13.2.189.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Pawson, R. 2005. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE.
  • Pawson, R. 2013. The Science of Evaluation a Realist Manifesto. London: SAGE.
  • Pawson, R., and A. Manzano-Santaella. 2012. “A Realist Diagnostic Workshop.” Evaluation 18 (2): 176–191.
  • Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage.
  • Prinsen, G., and S. Nijhof. 2015. “Between Logframes and Theory of Change: Reviewing Debates and a Practical Experience.” Development in Practice 25 (2): 234–246. doi:10.1080/09614524.2015.1003532.
  • Proudlock, K., B. Ramalingam, and P. Sandison. 2009. “Improving Humanitarian Impact Assessment: Bridging Theory and Practice.” In 8th Review of Humanitarian Action: Performance, Impact and Innovation. London: ALNAP/ODI.
  • Rogers, P. J., and C. H. Weiss. 2007a. “Theory-Based Evaluation: Reflections Ten Years on: Theory-Based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future.” New Directions for Evaluation 2007 (114): 63–81. doi:10.1002/ev.225.
  • Rogers, P. J., and C. H. Weiss. 2007b. “Theory Based Evaluation: Reflections Ten Years on: Theory-Based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future.” New Directions for Evaluation 2007 (114): 63–81. doi:10.1002/ev.225.
  • Rossi, P. H., M. W. Lipsey, and H. E. Freeman. 2004. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Vol. 7th. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Taplin, D. H., H. Clark, E. Collins, and D. C. Colby. 2013. Theory of Change.Act Knowledge: Technical Papers, pp. 1–22.
  • Trites, P. M. 2003. Workshop on Logical Framework Analysis for Overseas International Assistance Projects. Montreal: Concordia University.
  • Trochim, W. 1985. “Pattern Matching, Validity, and Conceptualization in Program Evaluation.” Evaluation Review 9 (5): 575. doi:10.1177/0193841X8500900503.
  • Vogel, I. 2012. Review of the Use of ‘Theory of Change’ in International Development, 1–86. UK: Department for International Development (DFID).
  • Vogel, I., and M. Punton. 2017. Building Capacity to Use Research Evidence (BCURE) Realist Evaluation: Stage 2 Synthesis Report.
  • Weiss, C. H. 1997. “Theory Based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future.” New Directions for Evaluation 1997 (76): 41–55. doi:10.1002/ev.1086.
  • Weiss, C.H. 1972. Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness. Prentice-Hall Methods of Social Science Series. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Westhorp, G. 2012. “Using Complexity-Consistent Theory for Evaluating Complex Systems.” Evaluation 18 (4): 405–420. doi:10.1177/1356389012460963.
  • Westhorp, G. 2014. Realist Impact Evaluation: An Introduction (Methods Lab). London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • White, H. 2009. “Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 1 (3): 271–284. doi:10.1080/19439340903114628.
  • Wholey, J.S. 1979. Evaluation: Promise and Performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  • Wholey, J.S. 1983. Evaluation and effective public management. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Wong, G., T. Greenhalgh, G. Westhorp, J. Buckingham, and R. Pawson. 2013. “RAMESES Publication Standards: Realist Syntheses.” BMC Medicine 11 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-21.
  • Woolcock, M. 2018. “Enhancing Public Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: From Good Policies and Best Practices to Better Implementation.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 46 (22_suppl): 10–18. doi:10.1177/1403494818765690.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.