Policy equipoise and interventional superiority

References

• Abramowicz, M., and S. Ariane. 2020. “Ethics of RCTs: Should Economists Care About Equipoise?” In Randomized Control Trials in the Field of Development: A Critical Perspective, edited by F. Bédécarrats, I. Guérin, and F. Roubaud, 280–292. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, M. D. 2019. Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asiedu, E., D. Karlan, M. P. Lambon-Quayefio, and C. R. Udry. 2021. “A Call for Structured Ethics Appendices in Social Science Papers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (29): e2024570118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024570118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baele, S. J. 2013. “The Ethics of New Development Economics: Is the Experimental Approach to Development Economics Morally Wrong?” The Journal of Philosophical Economics 7 (1): 2–42. https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.10653.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R., H. Mason, N. McHugh, and C. Donaldson. 2021. “Public Values and Plurality in Health Priority Setting: What to Do When People Disagree and Why We Should Care About Reasons as Well as Choices.” Social Science & Medicine 277 (May): 113892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113892.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chard, J. A., and R. J. Lilford. 1998. “The Use of Equipoise in Clinical Trials.” Social Science and Medicine 47 (7): 891–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00153-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, B. 1987. “Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical Research.” New England Journal of Medicine 317 (3): 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198707163170304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, C. 1974. Medical Experimentation: Personal Integrity and Social Policy. New York: American Elsevier Publishing CO. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, F. 2000. “Freedman’s ‘Clinical Equipoise’ and ‘Sliding-Scale All-Dimensions-Considered Equipoise’.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4): 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310(200008)25:4;1-A;FT399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handa, S., D. Seidenfeld, B. Davis, G. Tembo, and Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Team. 2016. “The Social and Productive Impacts of Zambia’s Child Grant.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 35 (2): 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilford, R. J., and J. Jackson. 1995. “Equipoise and the Ethics of Randomization.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 88 (10): 552–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, A. J. 2022. For the Common Good: Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• London, A. J. 2024. “Equipoise: Integrating Social Value and Equal Respect in Research with Humans.” In The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics, edited by A. Iltis and D. MacKay, 216–235. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. 2015. “Standard of Care, Institutional Obligations, and Distributive Justice.” Bioethics 29 (4): 262–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. 2018. “The Ethics of Public Policy RCTs: The Principle of Policy Equipoise.” Bioethics 32 (1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. 2020. “Government Policy Experiments and the Ethics of Randomization.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 48 (1): 319–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12174.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. 2024. “The Ethics of Public Policy Research: Lessons from Clinical Research Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics, edited by A. S. Iltis and D. MacKay, 445–472. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D., and A. Chakrabarti. 2019. “Government Policy Experiments and Informed Consent.” Public Health Ethics 12 (2): 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phy015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D., and E. Cohn. 2023. “Public Policy Experiments without Equipoise: When Is Randomization Fair?” Ethics & Human Research 45 (1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petticrew, M., M. McKee, K. Lock, J. Green, and G. Phillips. 2013. “In Search of Social Equipoise.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 346 (jul04 1): f4016–f4016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4016.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, L., and J. Millum. 2018. “Health Research Priority Setting: The Duties of Individual Funders.” The American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11): 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1523490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 20 November 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations, Treaty Series 1577:3.
   Google Scholar
• Ziliak, S. T., and E. R. Teather-Posadas. 2016. “The Unprincipled Randomization Principle in Economics and Medicine.” In The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, edited by G. F. DeMartino and D. McCloskey, 423–454. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar