Comparison and analysis of road tunnel traffic accident frequencies and rates using random-parameter models

References

• Amemiya, T. (1973). Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal. Econometrica 41(6), 997–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P. C., & Mannering, F. L. (2009). A note on modelling vehicle accidents frequencies with random-parameters count models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P. C., & Mannering, F. L. (2011). An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit modes using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1140–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P. C., Mannering, F. L., Shankar, V. N., & Haddock, J. E. (2012a). A multivariate tobit analysis of highway accident-injury-severity rates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 110–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P. C., Mannering, F. L., Shankar, V. N., & Haddock, J. E. (2012b). A study of factors affecting highway accident rates using the random-parameters tobit model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 628–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P. C., Tarko, A. P., & Mannering F. L. (2008). Tobit analysis of vehicle accident rates on interstate highways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 768–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, C., & De Guglielmo, M. L. (2012). Accident rates in road tunnels and social costs evaluation. SIIV- 5th International Congress-Sustainability of Road Infrastructures. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 166–177. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812043327
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, C., De Guglielmo, M.L., & Guida, M. (2013). A crash-prediction model for road tunnels. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 55, 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, C., & Guida, M. (2014). A new bivariate regression model for the simultaneous analysis of total and severe crashes occurrence. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security. 6(1),78–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, C., Guida, M., & Parisi, A. (2007). A crash-prediction model for multilane roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 657–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., & Tarko, A. P. (2014). Modeling safety of highway work zones with random parameters and random effects models. Analytic Methods in Accident Research. 1, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, H. C., & Quddus, M. A. (2003). Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 253—259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Basyouny, K., & Sayed, T. (2009). Accident prediction models with random corridor parameters. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(5), 1118–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fair, R. C. (1978). A theory of extramarital affairs. Journal of Political Economy, 86(1), 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnowski, M., & Manner, H. (2011). On factors related to car accidents on German Autobahn connectors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(5), 1864–1871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2007). LIMDEP, Version 9.0. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, G. (1996). Negative multinomial regression models for clustered events counts. Sociological Methodology, 26, 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halton, J. (1960). On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numerische Mathematik, 2, 84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer, E., & Bamfo, J. (1997). Two tools for finding what function links the dependent variable to the explanatory variables. In Proceedings of the International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Conference. Retrieved from: http://www.oocities.org/[email protected]/Pubs/ICTCT97TwoTools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hauer, E. (2004, January 11–15). Statistical road safety modeling. Paper presented at 83rd TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1897-11
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), 909–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. (2007). Negative binomial regression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from www.cambridge.org
   Google Scholar
• Lord, D., & Mannering, F. (2010). The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation Research Part A, 44, 291–305.
   Google Scholar
• Manner, H., & Wunsch-Ziegler, L. (2013). Analyzing the severity of accidents on the German Autobahn. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 57, 40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering, F. L., & Bhat C. R. (2014). Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research. 1, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. F., & Moffitt, R. A. (1980). The uses of tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), 318–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, J., Shankar, V., & Mannering, F. (2008). Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(1), 260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, F. (1977). Censored regression models with unobserved, stochastic censoring thresholds. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 309–327.
   Google Scholar
• Roncek, D. W. (1992). Learning more from tobit coefficients: Extending a comparative analysis of political protest. American Social Review, 57(4), 503–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, P. T., Mannering, F. L., Lord, D., & Quddus, M. A. (2011). The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43, 1666–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, V. N., Albin, R. B., Milton, J. C., & Mannering, F. L. (1998). Evaluating median crossover likelihoods with clustered accident counts: an empirical inquiry using the random effects negative binomial model. Transportation Research Record, 1635, 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, V. N., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003). Accident count model based on multiyear cross-sectional roadway data with serial correlation. Transportation Research Record, 1840, 193–197.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. A., & Brame, R. (2003). Tobit models in social science research: some limitations and a more general alternative Social Methods & Research, 31(3), 364–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), —36.
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, N., Ulfarsson, G. F., & Shankar, V. N. (2013). Random parameters models of interstate crash frequencies by severity, number of vehicles involved, collision and location type. Accident Analysis and Prevention 59, 309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2006). Temporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(6), 1137–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., & Mannering, F. L. (2011). Statistical and econometric methods of transportation data analysis. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, F., & Lord, D. (2014). Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: multinomial logit, ordered probit, and mixed logit. Analytic Methods in Accident Research. 1, 72–85.
   Google Scholar