A novel hybrid approach based on CREAM and fuzzy ANP to evaluate human resource reliability in the urban railway

References

• Aragón-Correa, J. A., Martín-Tapia, I., & Hurtado-Torres, N. E. (2013). Proactive environmental strategies and employee inclusion: The positive effects of information sharing and promoting collaboration and the influence of uncertainty. Organization & Environment, 26(2), 139–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613489034
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, T., Bayley, C., & Revie, M. (2013). Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of Human Reliability Analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 115, 100–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Cappelli, P. H. (2015). Skill gaps, skill shortages, and skill mismatches: Evidence and arguments for the United States. ILR Review, 68(2), 251–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793914564961
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S.-H., Lee, A. H., & Pearn, W. (2005). Product mix optimization for semiconductor manufacturing based on AHP and ANP analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(11-12), 1144–1156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1956-8
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. E., Ramey-Smith, A., Wreathall, J., & Parry, G. (1996). A technique for human error analysis (ATHEANA). Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, B. S. (2009). Human reliability, error, and human factors in engineering maintenance: With reference to aviation and power generation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enjalbert, S., Vanderhaegen, F., Pichon, M., Ouedraogo, K. A., & Millot, P. (2011). Assessment of transportation system resilience. Human modelling in assisted transportation (pp. 335–341). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. W. (2011). Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: 1980–2009. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(1), 391–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, K. (1975). AIPA risk assessment methodology. HTGR Accident Initiation Progression Analysis Status Report, General Atomics GA-AI
   Google Scholar
• Gertman, D. I. (1993). Representing cognitive activities and errors in HRA trees. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 39(1), 25–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(93)90145-O
   Google Scholar
• Hannanman, G., Spurgin, A., & Lukic, Y. (1984). Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis (Draft report NUS-4531). San Diego, CA: NUS Corporation
   Google Scholar
• He, X., Wang, Y., Shen, Z., & Huang, X. (2008). A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(2), 298–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E. (1998). Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational theory, design, and change: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I.-S. (2000). Applicability of HRA to support advanced MMI design review. Nuclear Engineering Technology, 32(1), 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan, B. (1992). Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1: Overview of approaches. Applied Ergonomics, 23(5), 299–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(92)90292-4
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan, B. (1994). A guide to practical human reliability assessment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Konstandinidou, M., Nivolianitou, Z., Kiranoudis, C., & Markatos, N. (2006). A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(6), 706–716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R., Kiyokawa, K., Arazoe, M., Ito, H., Iijima, Y., Matsushima, H., & Shimokawa, H. (2001). Analysis of organisation-committed human error by extended CREAM. Cognition, Technology & Work, 3(2), 67–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011525
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. M., Rajakarunakaran, S., & Prabu, V. A. (2015). Human reliability analysis by cognitive approach for unloading process in an ALDS (Auto LPG Dispensing Station). Indian Journal of Science Technology, 8(26)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M., Ha, J. S., & Seong, P. H. (2011). CREAM-based communication error analysis method (CEAM) for nuclear power plant operators’ communication. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(1), 90–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Macwan, A., & Mosleh, A. (1994). A methodology for modeling operator errors of commission in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 45(1-2), 139–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(94)90082-5
   Google Scholar
• Moller, S., Engelbrecht, K.-P., Kuhnel, C., Wechsung, I., & Weiss, B. (2009). A taxonomy of quality of service and quality of experience of multimodal human-machine interaction. Paper presented at the 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.
   Google Scholar
• Panesar-Walawege, R. K., Sabetzadeh, M., & Briand, L. (2013). Supporting the verification of compliance to safety standards via model-driven engineering: Approach, tool-support and empirical validation. Information and Software Technology, 55(5), 836–864. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Percin, S. (2008). Using the ANP approach in selecting and benchmarking ERP systems. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(5), 630–649.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x
   Google Scholar
• Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (2007). Human-system integration in the system development process: A new look. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. O., & Sagberg, F. (2014). What did you expect? CREAM analysis of hazardous incidents occurring on approach to rail signals. Safety Science, 66, 92–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Reer, B. (2008). Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission—Part 2: EOC quantification. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(8), 1105–1122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, 2, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schemeleva, K., Nguyen, C., Durieux, S., & Caux, C. (2012). Human error probabilities computation for manufacturing system simulation using CREAM. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Modeling, Optimization & SIMulation.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (2008). Risk, human error, and system resilience: Fundamental ideas. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 418–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250773
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, W. T. (1974). Man-machine systems. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, A. D., & Guttman, H. (1984). The Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction. NUREG/CR-1278. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Tamvakis, P., & Xenidis, Y. (2012). Resilience in transportation systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 3441–3450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1308
   Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2006). Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 21(1), 35–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9
   Google Scholar
• Tudor-Locke, C., Schuna, J., Jr, Frensham, L. J., & Proenca, M. (2014). Changing the way we work: Elevating energy expenditure with workstation alternatives. International Journal of Obesity, 38(6), 755–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.223
   Google Scholar
• Wan, C., Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Yan, X., & Fan, S. (2018). Resilience in transportation systems: A systematic review and future directions. Transport Reviews, 38(4), 479–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., & Hua, Z. (2008). On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 735–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050.
   Google Scholar
• Whittingham, R. (2004). The blame machine: Why human error causes accidents. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wikstrand, G. (1999). Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis-Applying CREAM to” Kollision Eksjö-Nässjö, 1996-10-08.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, H., Sun, H., Peng, S., Wu, J., Ge, Y.-e., & Chen, Y. (2018). Designing a safe and fair network for hazmat road transportation. Journal of Transportation Safety Security, 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2018.1497745
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, K., Takemoto, T., Murata, S., & Mitomo, N. (2014). A Study for Adapting a Human Reliability Analysis Technique to Marine Accidents. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 12th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Wang, J. (2018). Critical Link Analysis for Urban Transportation Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(2), 402–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2700080
   Google Scholar