Advanced stop boxes and their effect on traffic conflict rates between cyclists and turning vehicles

References

• Agerholm, N., Caspersen, S., & Lahrmann, H. (2008). Traffic safety on bicycle paths: Results from a new large scale Danish study. Paper presented at International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety (ICTCT), Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., Bygrave, S., & Harper, H. (2005). Behaviour at cycle advanced stop lines. Report No. PPR240. Wokingham: TRLS.
   Google Scholar
• Bahnsen, C. H., Madsen, T. K. O., Jensen, M. B., Lahrmann, H., & Moeslund, T. B. (2018). RUBA — Road user behaviour analysis. Aalborg University. Video analysis software, user manual and documentation. Retrieved from https://bitbucket.org/aauvap/ruba.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. doi:10.1002/jrsm.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch, T. S., & Jensen, S. U. (2017). Incidents between straight-ahead cyclists and right-turning motor-vehicles at signalised junctions. Accident, Analysis and Prevention, 105, 44–51. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, H., & Warneke, M. (2018). Risiko i trafikken 2007–2016 [Risk in traffic 2007–2016]. Transport DTU. Retrieved from https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/146185353/Risiko_i_trafikken_2007_16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino, J. B., McCarthy, M. L., Newgard, C. D., Wall, S. P., DiMaggio, C. J., Kulie, P. E., Arnold, B. N., & Zuby, D. S. (2020). Not all protected bike lanes are the same: Infrastructure and risk of cyclist collisions and falls leading to emergency department visits in three U.S. cities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 141, 105490. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Copenhagen. (2017). Copenhagen city of cyclists — The bicycle account 2016. City of Copenhagen. Retrieved from https://bicycleinfrastructuremanuals.com/manuals4/CPH%20bicycle-account-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, M., Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., & McClure, R. (2015). Assessing the 'system' in safe systems-based road designs: Using cognitive work analysis to evaluate intersection designs. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 74, 324–338. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish National Police, Danish Transport Authority & Danish Road Directorate. (2014). Strategy to prevent accidents between straight going cyclists and right turning lorries — Excerpts from the Danish strategy. Retrieved from https://www.trm.dk/media/3803/engelsk-hojresvingsstrategi-endelig-version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Danish National Travel Survey. (2018). The Danish national travel survey — Main results. Retrieved from https://www.cta.man.dtu.dk/english/tvu/hovedresultater.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Road Directorate. (2018). Cykelbokse [bike boxes]. Retrieved from http://www.vejdirektoratet.dk/DA/viden_og_data/temaer/trafiksikkerhed/Sider/Cykelbokse.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Road Directorate. (2019). Mastra database — Traffic counts. Retrieved from https://mastra.vd.dk/mastra/nytui/main/mastra.html.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Road Directorate. (2020). Accident data from the Danish national accident database VIS/vejman.dk. Retrieved from www.vejman.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2019). The highway code — Rules for cyclists (59 to 82). London: Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., Monsere, C. M., & McNeil, N. (2012). Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 44(1), 126–134. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvik, R. (2002). The importance of confounding in observational before-and-after studies of road safety measures. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 34(5), 631–635. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00062-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvik, R., Høye, A., Vaa, T., & Sørensen, M. (2009). The handbook of road safety measures (2nd ed.). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Fyhri, A., Sundfør, H. B., Bjørnskau, T., & Laureshyn, A. (2017). Safety in numbers for cyclists-conclusions from a multidisciplinary study of seasonal change in interplay and conflicts. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 105, 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gårder, P., Leden, L., & Thedéen, T. (1994). Safety implications of bicycle paths at signalized intersections. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 26(4), 429–439. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90034-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrstedt, L. (1979). Sikkerhed for cyklister og knallertkørere på hovedfaerdselsårer i Københavnsområdet [The safety of cyclists and moped riders on main roads in the Greater Copenhagen area]. Notat 5/1979. Copenhagen: Rådet for trafiksikkerhedsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Herrstedt, L., Nielsen, M. A., Agústsson, L., Lei, K. M., Jørgensen, E., & Jørgensen, N. O. (1994). Cyklisters sikkerhed i byer [Cyclist safety in urban areas]. Report 10. Copenhagen: Vejdirektoratet.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. W. (2000). Evaluation of an innovative application of the bike box. No. FHWA-RD-00-141.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. U. (2008). Safety effects of blue cycle crossings: A before-after study. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 742–750. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, C., Laureshyn, A., & De Ceunynck, T. (2018). In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: A review of surrogate safety indicators. Transport Reviews, 38(6), 765–785. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1442888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koorey, G., & Mangundu, E. (2010). Effects on motor vehicle behavior of color and width of bicycle facilities at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record. Retrieved from https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3891.
   Google Scholar
• Kraay, J. H. (1982). Proceedings of the third international workshop on traffic conflicts technique. SWOV R-82-27. Leidschendam, The Netherlands: SWOV.
   Google Scholar
• Laureshyn, A. (2010). Application of automated video analysis to road user behaviour [Doctoral Thesis]. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Laureshyn, A. (2015). T-analyst. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Laureshyn, A., De Ceunynck, T., Karlsson, C., Svensson, Å., & Daniels, S. (2017). In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: Extended delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 98, 46–56. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, L. (1992). Traffic safety evaluation of engineering measures — Development of a method and its application to how physical lay-outs influence bicyclists at signalized intersections. Lund: Lunds Institute of Technology. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Loskorn, J., Mills, A. F., Brady, J. F., Duthie, J. C., & Machemehl, R. B. (2013). Effects of bicycle boxes on bicyclist and motorist behavior at intersections in Austin, Texas. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(10), 1039–1046. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000584
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, T. K. O., & Lahrmann, H. S. (2017). Comparison of five bicycle facility designs in signalized intersections using traffic conflict studies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46(Part B), 438–450. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Nabavi-Niaki, M. S., Saunier, N., & Miranda-Moreno, L. F. (2019). Is that move safe? Case study of cyclist movements at intersections with cycling discontinuities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 131, 239–247. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlms, P. B., & Kweon, Y. (2018). Facilitating bicycle travel using innovative intersection pavement markings. Journal of Safety Research, 67, 173–182. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryley, T. J. (1996). Advanced stop lines for cyclists: The role of central cycle lane approaches and signal timings. TRL report 181. Workingham, UK: Transport Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sakshaug, L., Laureshyn, A., Svensson, Å., & Hydén, C. (2010). Cyclists in roundabouts — Different design solutions. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 42(4), 1338–1351. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers, P., Twisk, D., Fishman, E., Fyhri, A., & Jensen, A. (2017). The Dutch road to a high level of cycling safety. Safety Science, 92, 264–273. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SKL. (2009). Åtgärdskatalog för säker trafik i tätort [Solution catalogue for traffic safety in urban areas]. Sveriges Kommuner & Landsting. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Denmark. (2018). Population 1. January by urban, rural areas, age and sex. Retrieved from http://statbank.dk/by1
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, B., & DeRobertis, M. (2013). The safety of urban cycle tracks: A review of the literature. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 52, 219–227. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies — Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525–1536. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, G. T., Davies, D. G., & Crabtree, M. (2003). Capacity implications of advanced stop lines for cyclists. TRL 585. Workingham, UK: Transport Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Sayed, T., & Mannering, F. (2021). Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review of analytic methods and furture directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research , 29, 100142. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2020.100142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar